Question to Elon: "Was [Baker] asked to explain himself first?" Elon: "His explanation was.... unconvincing."
(media.greatawakening.win)
🕊️ TWITTER STAFF CUTS 🕊️
Comments (23)
sorted by:
LET THE BODIES HIT THE FLOOR!
Also, don't miss this
NEW — From Matt Taibbi: "THREAD: Twitter Files Supplemental
On Friday, the first installment of the Twitter files was published here. We expected to publish more over the weekend. Many wondered why there was a delay.
We can now tell you part of the reason why. On Tuesday, Twitter Deputy General Counsel (and former FBI General Counsel) Jim Baker was fired. Among the reasons? Vetting the first batch of “Twitter Files” – without knowledge of new management.
I like integrity. Elon did the Trump thing; you know...'YOU'RE FIRED!'
The question is, where will corrupt James Baker end up next? Perkins, Coie law firm working with the DNC-FBI?
I hope Musk can file some sort of lawsuit against Baker (RICO-pattern behavior...)
You know what I'd like to know? Does Perkins Coie still have a back door set up in the FBI systems at their office? Why has that story disappeared?
Some advisory role to the pedo 'administration'.
Probably in the ministry of truth.
Wonder why Elon waited this long? Surely he knew Baker was "in on it", at a minimum weeks ago if not long before he even purchased Twitter, right?
Baker could have flushed all the really juicy stuff long ago anyway. Maybe Baker's suppression/deletion work has all been completed now so it's time to move on to another organization to the same...
Maybe he was waiting for him to incriminate himself in real time.
It had to happen this way, ammo expended
Receipts below that Elon knew back in April that he was dodgy. Yet he did nothing and kept him on staff way after he took over.
Question is... Why?
https://twitter.com/JOSEPH_BlDEN/status/1600281106427019265?t=vlChX4KOEOgUBKRLQxw-_w&s=19
Yep, he had to know, or at least Elon's handlers/benefactors knew. They obviously needed to keep him around up until today for some reason....
How shameful; an attorney unable to articulate his position (convincingly)
This is going to be Massive Massive. Careful what you wish for?
The Supreme Court, in regard to "Information Important to Public Dialog" [excuse me but what?] kind of Trumps a lot of stuff. IMO. I am dumb though.
I am missing something, aren't I?
Can I have more Twitter files tonight please?
Nope. Gotta ticktock them out apparently.
Sounds like Elon needs to hose out the remaining vermin in the Twitter basement.
A bunch of stuttering and stammering and "our democracy" blahblahblah.
Lawyer=liar
i've been studying. can someone fill me in on what's going on? no idea who james baker is either.
Elon: "Your explanation is...... unconvincing." pushes classic villain button to open a trap door