Fellow anon WeekoWolf posted an interesting Tweet this morning (https://greatawakening.win/p/16ZXHKvmgi/power-and-influence-at-the-highe/c/) regarding a subject I've been chewing on for weeks now and I'm positive it's something that some of you have been chewing on as well.
The fact stated in this tweet is an example of why I believe there must be far, far more to Elon's acquisition of Twatter than what we can currently see. We've all heard rumblings that at least one intel agency owned servers within the Twatter server farm and I was able to privately confirm that to be the case.
Obviously, the world is now catching up to anons in discovering that Jim Baker and Fauci's daughter worked for Twatter, along with the obvious political and medical censorship that the platform engaged in.
But of course this is just what we know so far and perhaps more importantly, it's what the IC and Twatter leadership weren't able to hide/destroy before the purchase was finalized.
Where I'm heading with this is that it seems impossible to me that Musk was able to buy Twatter without substantial help from powerful players. Like it or not, Twatter is by far the most influential social media platform in the world. It was a major weapon of the deep state/IC for years, especially the last 3. No way in hell that they'd simply let Musk purchase the platform unless they were out maneuvered and out muscled.
(Obviously there's an alternative theory here in that the IC gave up nothing and Musk is simply a wolf in sheep's clothing. But I'm not seeing evidence of that yet)
Of course the other question is whether Musk was able to obtain data before the purchase went through of what I can only assume would be innumerable things deleted/destroyed by the IC within the Twatter server and software stack.
Curious to get some thoughts on this, anons.
Twitter IS the CIA. It came out of DARPA just like Facebook. Dorsey, Zuckerberg, Musk, Gates, Bezos, MacAfee, and on and on… didn’t invent/ found shit. They are Spooks who are selected to head up these Fascist companies.
This is the model where Corporations ARE the Government!!! The sheep see them as public companies that some genius came up with. No. This is the Deep State perpetuating its Fascism.
So to answer your question, NO FRICKIN WAY THE DEEP STATE ALLOWS A WHITE HAT TO TAKE OVER ONE OF THEIR VEHICLES!!!
In my opinion it’s a tactic the Deep Staye uses regularly called a Slap and Seal. They convict a lower down on minor charges and use the proceeding to bury evidence of darker crimes.
Elon is in the cleaning it up. Remember Resevoir Dogs??? He is the cleaner.
Great movie, but I think you mean Pulp Fiction. Harvey Keitel played the cleaner and his name was Mr Wolf
As for your point, I agree with you 100% on the origins of social media platforms.
https://searchvoat.co/v/politics/2223664
I have not figured out if Musk is a good guy or a bad guy, yet. He's doing mostly good things. Or at least they're being portrayed that way.
The sauds put up a lot of monies, other investors did too.
Ultimately tho we should all just let twitters die.
Taking over Twitter is turning out more seismic than expected. It was surely the black hat communication channel and propaganda platform as much as Google and Facebook. But more eyes were on the latter. Still, it looks like Twitter was a major objective in the info war. Wonder how far back that operation started? Perhaps there is some way to guess from past Twitter use.
During Trump, they gave Elon a lot of money. That's all I need to know.
Interesting - I have been pondering why they let it go to Musk but of course Q told us Goodbye @Jack Q495 Q525
Musk's inside informaton may have come from Jack Dorsey. I don't think Dorsey was happy with what Twitter became.
I also think Q's "when does a bird sing" may have been pointing to the whitehats taking Twiter over all along. If that is true Elon Musk is their guy.
It looks like it - but confusing if Musk is WH or BH - perhaps he was BH but has been turned!