Rolling Stone posts panicked article about "QAnon", citing specific members here, due to connecting dots between Beatles, Crowley, Child Sacrifice, & the Tavistock Institute. In an effort to disprove us, they managed to do the opposite and just spread research to the normies. We Are The News Now.
(www.rollingstone.com)
WE ARE THE NEWS
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (207)
sorted by:
I did that, and I think it even got stickied, and I also got some rebuttal.
I don't want to restrict open-mindedness and debate, but I want to make clear to journalists & normies that there are some specific ideas around here that are not officially from Q.
Someone on PDW tried to cite their disillusionment with Juan O' Savin as a reason why they abandoned Q. Once again it's that type of flawed thinking, connecting some 3rd party character to what we actually espouse.
When it comes to the more debatable topics, mods here do a good job of sticky-ing alternate takes for the sake of discussion.
...truth...
Couple this with the litany of times MSM rags have used Juan O Bullshittin as an example of "everything wrong with Q phenomenon" and I think it's safe to assume at this point in the timeline that Juan O is probably another MMM pundit. Especially given his track record of being 100% wrong on all accounts and "predictions."
At best a pay to play paytriot sophist. At worst a DS tool used against the greater research community.