Rolling Stone posts panicked article about "QAnon", citing specific members here, due to connecting dots between Beatles, Crowley, Child Sacrifice, & the Tavistock Institute. In an effort to disprove us, they managed to do the opposite and just spread research to the normies. We Are The News Now.
(www.rollingstone.com)
WE ARE THE NEWS
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (207)
sorted by:
Just because you don't believe it, and even if the majority of the people on this forum don't believe it, it doesn't mean that there aren't Q followers out there that do. They find each other, draw attention to themselves, and here we are.
I've seen it suggested that they are controlled opposition, or straight-up phonies created to make the rest of the movement look bad, but I've got bad news for you, others say the same about GA (coughPDWcough)
I've long noticed a wide spread attitude here that this forum is the end all, be all community of Q supporters. This is the only Q forum I've ever been to, but even I realize there are others out there.
The JFK Jr. theory sounded so absurd to me that I dismissed it outright for years. It was only out of boredom that I looked into it. I’m not a full believer, might not even be a partial believer, but I did learn that the theory is not as completely stupid as I assumed. In some ways it even makes sense. Like at a minimum, JFK Jr. would have known that the people who assassinated JFK and RFK would also want to assassinate him, right? And he had many years to figure that out too. Why would it be so crazy to fake his death to throw them off his trail, or at least get out of their crosshairs? Does anyone have any explanation for why that would be so inconceivable as to be preposterous? Do you also think every other story of someone faking their own death is also preposterous? Do you think the witness protection program is preposterous?
I've never seen a response to this. Plenty of people willing to say it's some preposterous, ridiculous fantasy that people like to cling to, but never seen an explanation of why it's actually so "ridiculous" to begin with.
On the level of ridiculous sounding theories, I feel like JFK Jr alive ranks far under 'a satanic pedophile cabal rules the world', but we all acknowledge that truth and no one tries to flippantly dismiss it as "preposterous" or "fantasy".
Sometimes it’s the conspiracy theories that get attacked the hardest that make me wonder. 5G is an example of that. I haven’t looked too much into the 5G stuff so nobody freak out and get triggered here, but why is it that one is sooo unacceptable? Like people on the right and the left will get so angry if anyone even mentions it. Is it because it makes people feel helpless? I think that must be it because I also haven’t looked into it for the same reasons. If it’s true, it’s outside of our control, so nobody wants to believe it? Very similar to the people who took the injection refusing to look into it, because why? They can’t uninject themselves, so there’s no upside to believing in it.
On the flip side to this, there is the conspiracy theories nobody freaks out about, like aliens. The people who believe in aliens like to think the government is suppressing them, but look at these Twitter Files. Look at all these FBI agents controlling the narrative on everything, but not on aliens? They don’t seem to care about aliens at all. No one gets cancelled for tweeting about aliens. There are no “fact-check” warnings on YouTube videos about aliens. Nobody in authority seems to care about aliens! This makes me think aliens are fake.
I think maybe you replied to my post by mistake?
No, I was jumping on the idea that there actually are Q followers who also flirt with the JFK Jr. theory and they aren’t necessarily stupid/evil.
My mom and aunt are one of these followers. That think Biden is a clone, JFK is alive, and the pope is a lizard-demon.
I think there is controlled opposition pushing that info out to doup Q followers and make us look bad. Particularly non tech savy, dont know what 4-chan is, or even photoshop, Qfollowers.
The sources they cite to me totally glow. Telegram is top one.
I'm curious, how do they respond when you tell them they've gone overboard?
Mmm they just think I dont get it and assume I am the naive one. Like the info is too much for me apparently.. lol
Kinda like how flat earthers react. (Apologies if you are one. Just its similar imo)
I think overly complex blocks of information is a brainwashing tactic. Its deep and complicated and connecting dots all over the place. It triggers something in people.
Ive concisely explaind this to them. But... I let them believe what they want for the most part. I don't argue with anyone about their beliefs. I just affirm mine when they ask or push an issue. Its the best tactic I've found.
Whats sad is my mom is a wiz at civics. They aren't dumb..
I think she uses it as a cope cus the truth is dark..