That may well be "the Plan," but how does splitting up California and other States into "New California" help that cause?
There's no way Newsome, Pelosi, or th Fed Govt allow this to happen. Even "if" this group gets the required amount of votes AND a win or two in the lower Fed Courts, there's ABSOLUTELY NO WAY IN HELL that SC(r)OTUS allows it. And even "if" they say yes, there's ABSOLUTELY NO WAY this passes resolution drafts in both Congressional Chambers AND/OR States' Convention. The Uniparty just WILL NEVWR give up such a huge cask cow as California (a state with a larger GDP than 90% of the rest of the World). This is a pipe dream that everyone here (and on VOAT) has been toking on for yrs now.
The Feds and individual States can't even agree on whether to allow P.R., American Samoa, or Guam to become our next States. What makes ANYONE here think they'll agree to give up California?!
Whatever y'all are smoking, DM me so I can score some too, because I need a good hallucinogenic trip right about now.
In areas that have become so entrenched with stinky deep staters in charge on so many levels, the quickest way to freedom may be through divorce. Divorce from the state.
Exactly. And that divorce will hasten the correction of the "stinky deep staters" problem in the leftover parts as well. People are free to vote with their feet. This would be our own version of "divide and conquer".
The doomers saying this can never work are apparently too dimwitted to realize the EXACT SAME PROCESS was used to create the state of West Virginia (as one example) in the past. Obviously, that process does in fact work.
CA has the most electoral votes by far, at 55. We’re the crown jewel of election fraud where it’s just assumed the elections go Left and nobody questions it.
Their worst nightmare would be splitting up those votes between “New CA” (which would be red) and the swamp of Old CA.
Same goes for Eastern WA, Eastern OR and Half of Idaho. The half of each wanting to split is because they are conservatives who have no representation from where the state government resides and they are fed up with rigged elections that never favor them.
I think they probably know the unlikeliness of it actually happening now. I think the purpose is it advertise to the Congress and public just how unhappy they are with the leadership in California. In thr future, it could possibly be included in a deal to grant statehood to.Puerto Rico as "New California" would likely be a red state that could balance out a likely blue state (although Puerto Ricans aren't necessarily guaranteed majority blue, from what I understand). This would be the same model as the slave state/free state deals they did back then.
That may well be "the Plan," but how does splitting up California and other States into "New California" help that cause?
There's no way Newsome, Pelosi, or th Fed Govt allow this to happen. Even "if" this group gets the required amount of votes AND a win or two in the lower Fed Courts, there's ABSOLUTELY NO WAY IN HELL that SC(r)OTUS allows it. And even "if" they say yes, there's ABSOLUTELY NO WAY this passes resolution drafts in both Congressional Chambers AND/OR States' Convention. The Uniparty just WILL NEVWR give up such a huge cask cow as California (a state with a larger GDP than 90% of the rest of the World). This is a pipe dream that everyone here (and on VOAT) has been toking on for yrs now.
The Feds and individual States can't even agree on whether to allow P.R., American Samoa, or Guam to become our next States. What makes ANYONE here think they'll agree to give up California?!
Whatever y'all are smoking, DM me so I can score some too, because I need a good hallucinogenic trip right about now.
In areas that have become so entrenched with stinky deep staters in charge on so many levels, the quickest way to freedom may be through divorce. Divorce from the state.
Exactly. And that divorce will hasten the correction of the "stinky deep staters" problem in the leftover parts as well. People are free to vote with their feet. This would be our own version of "divide and conquer".
The doomers saying this can never work are apparently too dimwitted to realize the EXACT SAME PROCESS was used to create the state of West Virginia (as one example) in the past. Obviously, that process does in fact work.
CA has the most electoral votes by far, at 55. We’re the crown jewel of election fraud where it’s just assumed the elections go Left and nobody questions it.
Their worst nightmare would be splitting up those votes between “New CA” (which would be red) and the swamp of Old CA.
Same goes for Eastern WA, Eastern OR and Half of Idaho. The half of each wanting to split is because they are conservatives who have no representation from where the state government resides and they are fed up with rigged elections that never favor them.
Yeah, New California is as likely as a state seceding.
I think they probably know the unlikeliness of it actually happening now. I think the purpose is it advertise to the Congress and public just how unhappy they are with the leadership in California. In thr future, it could possibly be included in a deal to grant statehood to.Puerto Rico as "New California" would likely be a red state that could balance out a likely blue state (although Puerto Ricans aren't necessarily guaranteed majority blue, from what I understand). This would be the same model as the slave state/free state deals they did back then.
Did I F*cking hear Pelosi???? 🤣 🤣 🤣 🤣 She was fired!