I know plenty when it comes to American and US history. I know many people are wrong on this. I know there are multiple sides to every story.
The confederate states' stated reason for leaving the union was to self-govern and protect their own interests, which is a reasonable and understandable desire. However, the underlying reason for their decision to secede was their desire to maintain and expand the practice of slavery, which is morally reprehensible and completely unacceptable.
However, the underlying reason for their decision to secede was their desire to maintain and expand the practice of slavery, which is morally reprehensible and completely unacceptable.
There we go, throw out the LIE, so that people think it's a Moral High Ground taken by the Aggressor....
Sounds exactly like something some Clown from ANTIFA would say, IF they were living back then....
the Truth is that Under States Rights, the STATE has the Responsibility to Allow or Make Unlawful certain things, Drugs, Murder, Property Damage, Rape, Slavery, Stealing, etc....
And the southern Slave owners had already seen that they were actually losing money because of the Ownership of Slaves, and because of the New Machines that were being invented, such as the Cotton gin, The Sewing Machine, the Vacuum Milker, so they were looking for ways to get rid of the Slaves, and move in the Machines in order to improve their Plantations and be prosperous....
Slavery was on the way OUT,and the Northern States knew it, so did the Rothschilds in Europe, so they got Busy planning and implementing the destruction of the Southern States....
Incorrect.
The 1856 Democratic Convention illustrates the deep division within the party over the issue of slavery. Both Northern and Southern Democrats supported slavery, but disagreed on how it should be addressed. The Northern Democrats favored allowing individual states to decide on the legality of slavery, while Southern Democrats believed it should be legal in all states. This division within the party, as well as the Northern Democrats' alignment with the 1956 convention, shows that the issue of slavery was not simply a geographical one, but rather a party-wide issue for Democrats. This demonstrates that the Democratic Party, as a whole, supported slavery, rather than it being solely a southern issue.
Since the Beginning of the Union, Laws that the federation Adopts, are all started at State Level, collected and organized that Federal Level, and when they reach a Majority at State Level, meaning a Mjaority of State support a Specific Law, then the U.S. Clowngress puts it to vote, and make it Law....
They haven't done that in DECADES, like 70 Years or more....
Americans did NOT want to join the War in Europe, some were aware of the War of 1812, and didn't trust the Brits to turn once again, and we still shouldn't trust them in any way....
It was a state issue, but humans are not and should never have been property of another human. Ownership of a other is not a right. Removing it as an option was the correct and moral thing to do. Should we make murder, incest, and rape state issues as well while we are at it?
I think you only read half of that. The southern democrats wanted what we have now but the opposite. Force legal slavery in all states. They weren't fighting to make it a state issue. Reread what I wrote
I read that before
I know plenty when it comes to American and US history. I know many people are wrong on this. I know there are multiple sides to every story.
The confederate states' stated reason for leaving the union was to self-govern and protect their own interests, which is a reasonable and understandable desire. However, the underlying reason for their decision to secede was their desire to maintain and expand the practice of slavery, which is morally reprehensible and completely unacceptable.
There we go, throw out the LIE, so that people think it's a Moral High Ground taken by the Aggressor....
Sounds exactly like something some Clown from ANTIFA would say, IF they were living back then....
the Truth is that Under States Rights, the STATE has the Responsibility to Allow or Make Unlawful certain things, Drugs, Murder, Property Damage, Rape, Slavery, Stealing, etc....
And the southern Slave owners had already seen that they were actually losing money because of the Ownership of Slaves, and because of the New Machines that were being invented, such as the Cotton gin, The Sewing Machine, the Vacuum Milker, so they were looking for ways to get rid of the Slaves, and move in the Machines in order to improve their Plantations and be prosperous....
Slavery was on the way OUT,and the Northern States knew it, so did the Rothschilds in Europe, so they got Busy planning and implementing the destruction of the Southern States....
Incorrect. The 1856 Democratic Convention illustrates the deep division within the party over the issue of slavery. Both Northern and Southern Democrats supported slavery, but disagreed on how it should be addressed. The Northern Democrats favored allowing individual states to decide on the legality of slavery, while Southern Democrats believed it should be legal in all states. This division within the party, as well as the Northern Democrats' alignment with the 1956 convention, shows that the issue of slavery was not simply a geographical one, but rather a party-wide issue for Democrats. This demonstrates that the Democratic Party, as a whole, supported slavery, rather than it being solely a southern issue.
Exactly, it was always a State Issue....
That is what I've been sayin this whole time....
Since the Beginning of the Union, Laws that the federation Adopts, are all started at State Level, collected and organized that Federal Level, and when they reach a Majority at State Level, meaning a Mjaority of State support a Specific Law, then the U.S. Clowngress puts it to vote, and make it Law....
They haven't done that in DECADES, like 70 Years or more....
Americans did NOT want to join the War in Europe, some were aware of the War of 1812, and didn't trust the Brits to turn once again, and we still shouldn't trust them in any way....
It was a state issue, but humans are not and should never have been property of another human. Ownership of a other is not a right. Removing it as an option was the correct and moral thing to do. Should we make murder, incest, and rape state issues as well while we are at it?
I think you only read half of that. The southern democrats wanted what we have now but the opposite. Force legal slavery in all states. They weren't fighting to make it a state issue. Reread what I wrote