They have NEVER worked for "us". Not this year. Not 10 years ago. Not 100 years ago. Last time was the 1850s prior to the coup mistakenly known as the "Civil War".
I agree. Ironically some founders were very strongly against political parties. I believe Jefferson was very heated about it. When Hamilton created one to get the federal banking institutions implemented, Jefferson started a party of his own as a counterbalance. And there you have it, even the founders couldn't avoid political parties.
That's my recollection at least. Apologies if I flubbed some details. That was my takeaway.
What would be a good place to start to learn more about this! This is fascinating stuff, Fren. The kind of stuff that actually interests me about the history. The gritty details. What should I read?
The Politically Incorrect Guide To The American Revolution
The Founding Father's Guide To The Constitution
Washington's Immortals
A Patriot's History Of The United States
Killing England
I am pretty sure the Federalist Papers discussed the Jefferson/Hamilton friction. I've read/listened to them all, some more than once, so it kind of blends together in my Patriot mind. 😉
....That Hamilton character again. Have you ever noticed American history taught in school consistently portrays Alexander Hamilton as some great political philosopher opposite of Jefferson. It is always 'Hamiltonian' versus 'Jeffersonian' thought that's presented. In reality, Jefferson predominantly prevailed, while Hamilton was sidelined. Correct me if I am wrong, but to me his role in the formation of the Constitution was used as the countering argument.
Continuing with this line of thinking, have you noticed Alexander Hamilton is never attacked like Thomas Jefferson is in the modern age. Coincidence? I think not. Jefferson is besmirched and slandered from everything to having slaves, smoking weed, to having sex and offspring with one of his slaves (which is a dubious and void of evidence despite what the MSM presents). It's intended to slander and undermine the brilliance of one of our greatest founding fathers.
Alexander was an agent for the Rothschilds. His role was to subvert the American birth of governance and shackle it through establishing a Rothschild national bank.
I often wonder if there was more to the story and reason why Aaron Burr shot and killed Alexander Hamilton.
And they don't make "Laws". They make statutes, codes, acts, mandates, decrees, orders, etc. It's all 100% deception. Humanity needs none of these. They are written to put us into servitude to the liege lords.
The universe/God has made all the "laws" we need. They are obvious and self-evident.
We have been deceived through the deceptive use of words and language. This is the "legal system" - the liege system. It's based on the realm of the non-living, the dead, the fictional. Thus, all statutes (statues = dead), codes (secreted words), acts (playing a role), etc. are for non-living men and women. They have authority only over the dead, the "Corp-Oration" (Talking corpse), an aberration in the realm of the real.
"Statutory Law" is not "Law" at all. It's a defilement of "Law". And as such, it doesn't apply to living men, women and people. And that's why no statute contains the words man/woman/people. Instead, statutes apply to their other invented fictional entities like; persons, citizens, residents, taxpayers, defendants, drivers, tenants, home-owners, etc. These are "titles of slavery", as opposed to "titles of Nobility" -> Lord, esquire, earl, duke, etc.
The trick is, they got everybody to agree to accept their "titles of slavery" with simple words on paper. And as such, they then gain control over the ignorant sheeple.
They have NEVER worked for "us". Not this year. Not 10 years ago. Not 100 years ago. Last time was the 1850s prior to the coup mistakenly known as the "Civil War".
A concise and simple history lesson every student should learn.
I agree. Ironically some founders were very strongly against political parties. I believe Jefferson was very heated about it. When Hamilton created one to get the federal banking institutions implemented, Jefferson started a party of his own as a counterbalance. And there you have it, even the founders couldn't avoid political parties.
That's my recollection at least. Apologies if I flubbed some details. That was my takeaway.
What would be a good place to start to learn more about this! This is fascinating stuff, Fren. The kind of stuff that actually interests me about the history. The gritty details. What should I read?
Hey fren! Here are some of my favorites.
I am pretty sure the Federalist Papers discussed the Jefferson/Hamilton friction. I've read/listened to them all, some more than once, so it kind of blends together in my Patriot mind. 😉
Hamilton was scum
....That Hamilton character again. Have you ever noticed American history taught in school consistently portrays Alexander Hamilton as some great political philosopher opposite of Jefferson. It is always 'Hamiltonian' versus 'Jeffersonian' thought that's presented. In reality, Jefferson predominantly prevailed, while Hamilton was sidelined. Correct me if I am wrong, but to me his role in the formation of the Constitution was used as the countering argument.
Continuing with this line of thinking, have you noticed Alexander Hamilton is never attacked like Thomas Jefferson is in the modern age. Coincidence? I think not. Jefferson is besmirched and slandered from everything to having slaves, smoking weed, to having sex and offspring with one of his slaves (which is a dubious and void of evidence despite what the MSM presents). It's intended to slander and undermine the brilliance of one of our greatest founding fathers.
Alexander was an agent for the Rothschilds. His role was to subvert the American birth of governance and shackle it through establishing a Rothschild national bank.
I often wonder if there was more to the story and reason why Aaron Burr shot and killed Alexander Hamilton.
So right... people should realize that's why our lawmakers have created laws that makes it almost impossible to remove them from office.
And they don't make "Laws". They make statutes, codes, acts, mandates, decrees, orders, etc. It's all 100% deception. Humanity needs none of these. They are written to put us into servitude to the liege lords.
The universe/God has made all the "laws" we need. They are obvious and self-evident.
We have been deceived through the deceptive use of words and language. This is the "legal system" - the liege system. It's based on the realm of the non-living, the dead, the fictional. Thus, all statutes (statues = dead), codes (secreted words), acts (playing a role), etc. are for non-living men and women. They have authority only over the dead, the "Corp-Oration" (Talking corpse), an aberration in the realm of the real.
"Statutory Law" is not "Law" at all. It's a defilement of "Law". And as such, it doesn't apply to living men, women and people. And that's why no statute contains the words man/woman/people. Instead, statutes apply to their other invented fictional entities like; persons, citizens, residents, taxpayers, defendants, drivers, tenants, home-owners, etc. These are "titles of slavery", as opposed to "titles of Nobility" -> Lord, esquire, earl, duke, etc.
The trick is, they got everybody to agree to accept their "titles of slavery" with simple words on paper. And as such, they then gain control over the ignorant sheeple.
This is the trick. Simple yet ingenious, eh?