Brunson - CERTIORARI DENIED
SEE TOP COMMENT!
https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/010923zor_p860.pdf
Page 5
22-380 BRUNSON, RALAND J. V. ADAMS, ALMA S., ET AL.
What process is that? The weed out process?
The Justices have clerks who comb through the 7,000 or so petitions brought every year for one of merit, then they summarily vote to deny the rest. Brunson was one of about 300 in the order today.
Look at the docket for the Brunson case. There was no action by the court to do anything, other than the clerk of the court refusing to accept some amicus briefs because they missed the deadline. This is the first actual action SCOTUS has taken on this case - there was no order to accept or any such thing.
Not dooming, just spitting facts.
Fren, I have a few question since you seem to know.
Is there any way to see how each justice voted on this?
a) if we can't know, would it be possible for the military to know (in case this case was a way to see which justices were not compromised)
if it was denied how much of a chance do you think the reconsideration would have?
A. No mechanism that I know of. There would likely be major Constitutional issues with this.
Thank you fren, TY very much! I prefer the hard truth to more delusions of hope. So would you say that it seems like there is no judicial way forward at this point?
Trump, Musk & Gen Flynn all seem to imply something is up soon. Do you think that's the ol' "military is the only way" Would you say that's the only way at this point?
There is no judicial way forward with this case, at least (and they’re likely never was).
Not sure about the military, either, but that’s not my area of expertise.
This guy is utterly unhinged and cannot be reasoned with. He has some kind of personal vested interest in lying to himself about how SCOTUS does business. Any argument to the contrary results in complete meltdown. No matter how many times I have told him that every single case properly filed before the Court goes to conference, he has some delusion about how there is a "secret" way they kick cases out before doing the standard operating procedure. Lost cause. Wouldn't bother trying to fix the extreme Dunning-Kruger on display here.
Lol I’m actually a lawyer (though not an appellate lawyer), just trying to help without sounding like a doomer.
It isn't dooming to point out the obvious problems with this case. That is what has been the most frustrating. Pretty damn clear that these guys have grifted off of filing a bogus lawsuit and duped a lot of people into believing in it. I wonder how much they made off of this...couple hundred grand?
This explains why the Brunson case was brought to public attention via PAYtriot streamers the likes of Juan O Bullshillin, Nino, McKay, et al...
Not everyone is a grifter like you.