I like Q-Post #970 for that, post date March 28th. Thirty days (for Brunson Bros to file a petition) brings us to early-mid February. Some time to docket and schedule then thirty days from then to bring us to mid-late March. What happens as a result if they clear that hurdle is yet to be seen. I especially like that "final stage" part. I know it's going to take awhile, probably a couple years, to hash through this cabal-ese garbage, but a lot can happen in two years time. Hopeful, one way or another.
I keep saying, Brunson case was a insurance policy against stealing the House from MAGA. Now that the house is safe, the case will be put on ice, to be resurrected as necessary, until, I predict, it will be in play at the very end, when we hit the precipice.
A lot of their perspective stems from the understanding of how SCOTUS works and what their specific actions mean, and not as much on the facts of the matter.
I do agree that we wont see any major bomb drop - atleast not until the end.
But I do not agree that this case is inconsequential - I believe it (or one of their related cases) has already played a role and will keep playing a role in guiding the Congress's actions up until the precipice.
Done in 30 anyone?!
Please God
I like Q-Post #970 for that, post date March 28th. Thirty days (for Brunson Bros to file a petition) brings us to early-mid February. Some time to docket and schedule then thirty days from then to bring us to mid-late March. What happens as a result if they clear that hurdle is yet to be seen. I especially like that "final stage" part. I know it's going to take awhile, probably a couple years, to hash through this cabal-ese garbage, but a lot can happen in two years time. Hopeful, one way or another.
.
"... Done in 30.
House cleaning.
WH secured.
Final stage.
Q "
.
https://qalerts.app/?q=%23970
Everything happening all at once would be amazing.
Things improving gradually instead of swirling collectively down the shitter would be great too though.
I keep saying, Brunson case was a insurance policy against stealing the House from MAGA. Now that the house is safe, the case will be put on ice, to be resurrected as necessary, until, I predict, it will be in play at the very end, when we hit the precipice.
What are your thoughts on the Tracey Beanz / Inside DC perspective on the Brunson Case?
A lot of their perspective stems from the understanding of how SCOTUS works and what their specific actions mean, and not as much on the facts of the matter.
I do agree that we wont see any major bomb drop - atleast not until the end.
But I do not agree that this case is inconsequential - I believe it (or one of their related cases) has already played a role and will keep playing a role in guiding the Congress's actions up until the precipice.
Thanks BB.