Having trouble explaining the Hegelian Dialectic to normies? This old Far Side comic perfectly illustrates the Hegelian Dialectic at work. Problem -> Reaction -> Solution
(media.greatawakening.win)
🐸 WAG THE FROG 🐸
Gary Larson is a genius and his cartoons from way back are early versions of memes.
Gary Larson helped me see life in a happier pattern.
Me too. We always had the latest Far Side calendar on our kitchen wall.
Remember The Deer Abby getting all the depressing letters sent to them?
Yes! I also loved this one
https://images.app.goo.gl/bNmuZ4X8c7jECfMj9
Larson credits his audience by not showing the brick or that the victim unwrapped Al’s message from around the brick.
Good observation. Modern comics would show the brick + an arrow pointing to it explaining how the letter was attached to it as if talking to 2nd graders.
Also illustrates (literally)the broken window fallacy that the Keynesian econ hacks conveniently ignore
Awesome.
Thanks for following up with your post. I just posted something that relates to that.
Ah, the old Problem Reaction Solution nwo sandwich.
It's simple to understand.
Hegelian dialectic = dialetical materialism = marxism
No, it is. Brick through window = COVID. Purchasing new glass window = signing away freedoms to medical tyranny. Or how about this: brick through window = 9/11. Purchasing new glass window = signing away freedoms to the Patriot Act. Lots of false flags follow this pattern, fren.
Controlled opposition doesn’t mean what you think it does
Fox News is controlled opposition. They say it’s opposition to liberals but they have the same goals in the end…to string along the conservatives and keep them complacent
Controlled opposition is absolutely not what you are claiming it is.
Controlled opposition would be when something is posed as part of the opposition when it is in fact not part of that opposition.
The comic illustrates absolutely none of the above.
Controlled opposition is wolves in sheep’s clothing, not a wolf causing an issue and then offering a solution to their own caused issue. The two are completely different.
Except the example is not even a false flag though. The letter via brick is openly the cause. How in the world are you assuming the example is a false flag and controlled opposition or an attempt to deceive without being open?? Are you aware of what you’re saying?