So they'll lie about the jab but not space/the shape of earth? How does that stupidity compute in your head? Killing kids in the name of science is fine? But the shape of earth and space is the line you think they won't cross. You aren't as smart as you as trying to be. The argument that "nasa must be right because Noone has proposed better" is a flat out lie and fallacy.
The Magellan expedition circumvented the Earth in the early 1500's, proving the world is a giant ball.
While it did not exactly move in a straight line in one direction (the ships needs to make port, time to time.), it was a astronomical achievement for its time.
We know they lied about the jab. We caught them red handed changing the definition of vaccines, and their claims that the jab protects against Covid have been demonstrated to be false. Every attempt to prove that the earth is flat, on the other hand, has fallen flat on its face.
Also, we know that there was a motive to lie about covid and the jabs; Big Pharma made billions. What benefit is gained from lying about the shape of the earth?
And no, my final argument is not invalid. If you want to propose an alternate explanation for the nature of the universe, the onus is on you to show that your proposal coincides with reality. The theory that best explains the available evidence wins until new evidence is discovered. Screaming that NASA was founded by Freemasons isn’t a good counter argument.
You're also incorrect, there's a set of positive claims that have been made concerning the shape, size, density, speed in multiple different vectors (around the sun, sun around the galaxy, galaxy relative to others) that are not objectively proven. The onus is on the one making the positive claims more than those who point out the flaws in those claims.
Well, you can start with the heliocentric model, where a geocentric model operates equally well. It's not been proven and could not be within a planetary reference because of the relative motion.
The heliocentric model is proffered because it is more simple to draw, and for the philosophical reasoning of not wanting to have the earth in a special position.
So they'll lie about the jab but not space/the shape of earth? How does that stupidity compute in your head? Killing kids in the name of science is fine? But the shape of earth and space is the line you think they won't cross. You aren't as smart as you as trying to be. The argument that "nasa must be right because Noone has proposed better" is a flat out lie and fallacy.
Sail straight west, without veering and eventually you will end up where you started. This is not possible on a flat plane.
The Magellan expedition circumvented the Earth in the early 1500's, proving the world is a giant ball.
While it did not exactly move in a straight line in one direction (the ships needs to make port, time to time.), it was a astronomical achievement for its time.
Circumnavigated, and yes, it wasn't a straight line, but because continents were in the way
False. you will always have to adjust north to go around and end up where you started. if you didn't you will be heading south.
We know they lied about the jab. We caught them red handed changing the definition of vaccines, and their claims that the jab protects against Covid have been demonstrated to be false. Every attempt to prove that the earth is flat, on the other hand, has fallen flat on its face.
Also, we know that there was a motive to lie about covid and the jabs; Big Pharma made billions. What benefit is gained from lying about the shape of the earth?
And no, my final argument is not invalid. If you want to propose an alternate explanation for the nature of the universe, the onus is on you to show that your proposal coincides with reality. The theory that best explains the available evidence wins until new evidence is discovered. Screaming that NASA was founded by Freemasons isn’t a good counter argument.
Excellent points. I'll keep quiet for a while if the FE people can just explain how the 24-hour day ever happens at the South Pole.
Billions of dollars per year.
You're also incorrect, there's a set of positive claims that have been made concerning the shape, size, density, speed in multiple different vectors (around the sun, sun around the galaxy, galaxy relative to others) that are not objectively proven. The onus is on the one making the positive claims more than those who point out the flaws in those claims.
Which claims specifically haven’t been proven?
Well, you can start with the heliocentric model, where a geocentric model operates equally well. It's not been proven and could not be within a planetary reference because of the relative motion.
The heliocentric model is proffered because it is more simple to draw, and for the philosophical reasoning of not wanting to have the earth in a special position.