Weimar as a means to an end. Fasco-dictatorship. Hitler couldn't have risen to power if Weimar didn't precede him. The same club controls both sides, they just grant power to one or the other to "maintain balance."
They do, in fact, want to have us rush head-long into extreme conservatism, so long as it stays authoritarian. Then, a couple decades down the line, the same voices on the left today will tell us "we told you so, we need to 'return' to the liberal ideology."
They are slowly teeter-tottering us up the Tower of Babel -- bouncing between radical conservatism and radical liberalism. Two sides of the same coin, which plants itself delicately in the coffer of Tyranny.
It's just a game to them, and at the start they pick the red team or the blue team. What they proselitize doesn't matter to them, so long as the end result is control and power over the [feeders.]
Yep. The 1950s were family-oriented -- homes with white picket fences, Mom stayed home to take care of the kids, while Dad went to work at an 9-5 job that actually was 9-5. Then, the 60's hit -- Vietnam war, JFK assassination, hippies, free love, birth control, drugs, the beginning of the disintegration of the nuclear family. Now, the pendulum is swinging back. We've had enough.
This swing back, however, is attempting to break the clock's housing.
They want to take us back with such restrictive conservative values that it becomes a Spanish Inquisition state.
I know it's hard to accept considering we're fighting literal child fuckers, but censorship is wrong regardless of who is pulling the levers. We are very close to conservative straight-edges banning anime because a few artists are drawing 1000 year old loli's in compromising positions.
Okay, sure, that's degenerate, but if you ban it don't you see what you're allowing to happen next?
It doesn't matter if you agree or disagree with that content, the fact is that once you ban it you open the bureaucratic door to pinch little bits at a time at what is considered "safe" art. After they go after anime/manga, they will turn their eyes to all independent artists. Eventually, memes will fall under the umbrella of the same auspice. Finally, we won't so much as be able to post hand-drawn figures online without the same Karens calling it pedophilic, satanic, or some such other "ic."
It's all just more of the same. People claiming the moral high ground and beating you down. Bullies in positions of authority...
Music will be restricted to no longer allow cursing or "problematic" themes. Shows would all be required to pass "royal road" checks to be aired. YouTube would be reduced to nothing more than a modern-day America's Funniest Home Videos...
And that's just the start.
All it really is is nothing more than a choke hold on fun. Depressed and spiteful creatures willing to toss your game console out the window because you aren't paying attention to them. They'll bitch and moan about what you're doing, but in reality it's not what you're doing nor the moral values it represents, but the simple fact that they aren't being worshipped and praised.
Hyper-conservatives did this when they pushed against rock-and-roll.
Hyper-liberal bitches did this during segregation with their "separate but equal" mantras.
Hyper-conservatives did this even during the 90's and the various edgy toys and games that came about like Mortal Kombat.
Hyper-liberal woke are doing it now, inserting politics and demanding the gaming industry, for example, bend to their interests despite them never playing anything more intense than angry-birds or candy crush.
We have to be very careful not to hand the keys to fun from one overbearing Karen with blue hair to another overbearing Karen with red hair. Both hate memes, which should tell you everything you need to know about them. Red or blue paint, they'll still suck the fun out of your life because they can't stand other people having fun while they sulk and scheme like the Grinch.
Probably more of a rant than you'd have expected...
"Probably more of a rant than you'd have expected..."
LOL! I was thinking more along the lines of this being an organic transition -- that people would long for the days when we were morally inclined to do good and would work together to achieve a better world and rid ourselves of this leftist baggage.
that people would long for the days when we were morally inclined to do good and would work together to achieve a better world and rid ourselves of this leftist baggage.
That's why the Cabal is pushing the trans and drag stuff so far. They create a boogeyman, kill the boogeyman, and then get everyone to hold them up as heroes. It's all just controlled opposition, artificially putting them in seats of power.
They know people are begging for a return to sanity, which is why they always have a contingent of RINOs seated and on stand-by to take the reigns once the other side is done raising up stink people will desperately sell their souls to be rid of.
The pining for a return to a moral, nuclear family can absolutely be used against us. Just like with their Central Banking Digital Currency scheme. Destroy the financial sector, blame it on liberal spending, then offer the solution by way of a One-World-Currency to relieve all the stress and fear people now have after waking up and being told their bank can't afford to give them their paycheck.
It's the time tested bait-and-switch.
Again, so long as Tyranny is the end result, they don't care what color flag they wave.
Ive been talking about the pendulum swinging back for years. It has always been this way. I have cautioned here many times to tone down the rhetoric and that tyranny from the right is just as dangerous as tyranny on the left. Both sides use death squads.
Without a doubt this is comms. Its definitely a signal of a new phase or shift in plans.
WH or BH? Im not sure but you would think the BHs wouldnt be doing comms on OANN. Is this originally from OANN or did they pick it up from another news service? The originator would give us a clue, Id think.
The fraud of all governments (at least all the main ones of the "modern" world) is the claim of the right to dictate the behavior, along with claims of ultimate property ownership, of some loosely defined group of peoples (typically called a "Nation").
Every person, no matter their "station" in life, nor where they hail from, is the Ultimate Authority of their own lives (AKA Sovereign). Every government, including the United States, makes claims to the Right to dictate limits on the choices of the people, and their property. The only difference between the US and any other government of note (including all Monarchies) is that the US pretended to be different. There are notable places within the Constitution itself which prove the pretense false.
Monarchy means "ruled by one" but in the practice of the European Monarchies, they made claim to be Sovereign over the people through "Divine Right." That's how the Monarchies sold it, but of course the only way they could sell it was by driving the belief, through the doctrine of The Church, that we are Separate from Source. If we aren't separate from Source, then we are Sovereign ourselves. If we are separate from Source, then we must do what the people who aren't separate from Source (Kings and Queens) dictate.
That is the same fraud that all governments have perpetrated going back thousands of years. The Priest class and the Ruling class have invariably been the same class (except when the Priest class was higher).
The US is a little different in that it creates the fraud through lip service to individual Sovereignty, but then uses explicit statements of government as Sovereign. Such statements can be found within its founding documents (5th Amendment e.g.). The worst offense, from the beginning, and the way the fraud was perpetrated, was that there was no explicit statements of such individual Sovereignty contained within the Constitution itself, and only implicit statements within the DOI. From these loose foundations it was trivial to create the Aristocracy we have always had, from day one.
10 Samuel told all the words of the Lord to the people who were asking him for a king. 11 He said, “This is what the king who will reign over you will claim as his rights: He will take your sons and make them serve with his chariots and horses, and they will run in front of his chariots. 12 Some he will assign to be commanders of thousands and commanders of fifties, and others to plow his ground and reap his harvest, and still others to make weapons of war and equipment for his chariots. 13 He will take your daughters to be perfumers and cooks and bakers. 14 He will take the best of your fields and vineyards and olive groves and give them to his attendants. 15 He will take a tenth of your grain and of your vintage and give it to his officials and attendants. 16 Your male and female servants and the best of your cattle[c] and donkeys he will take for his own use. 17 He will take a tenth of your flocks, and you yourselves will become his slaves. 18 When that day comes, you will cry out for relief from the king you have chosen, but the Lord will not answer you in that day.”
I'd say it's comms.
Pendulum shift.
They pulled this same crap between WW1 and WW2.
Weimar as a means to an end. Fasco-dictatorship. Hitler couldn't have risen to power if Weimar didn't precede him. The same club controls both sides, they just grant power to one or the other to "maintain balance."
They do, in fact, want to have us rush head-long into extreme conservatism, so long as it stays authoritarian. Then, a couple decades down the line, the same voices on the left today will tell us "we told you so, we need to 'return' to the liberal ideology."
They are slowly teeter-tottering us up the Tower of Babel -- bouncing between radical conservatism and radical liberalism. Two sides of the same coin, which plants itself delicately in the coffer of Tyranny.
It's just a game to them, and at the start they pick the red team or the blue team. What they proselitize doesn't matter to them, so long as the end result is control and power over the [feeders.]
https://qalerts.app/?q=feeder
https://qalerts.app/?n=184
u/#q184
Yep. The 1950s were family-oriented -- homes with white picket fences, Mom stayed home to take care of the kids, while Dad went to work at an 9-5 job that actually was 9-5. Then, the 60's hit -- Vietnam war, JFK assassination, hippies, free love, birth control, drugs, the beginning of the disintegration of the nuclear family. Now, the pendulum is swinging back. We've had enough.
This swing back, however, is attempting to break the clock's housing.
They want to take us back with such restrictive conservative values that it becomes a Spanish Inquisition state.
I know it's hard to accept considering we're fighting literal child fuckers, but censorship is wrong regardless of who is pulling the levers. We are very close to conservative straight-edges banning anime because a few artists are drawing 1000 year old loli's in compromising positions.
Okay, sure, that's degenerate, but if you ban it don't you see what you're allowing to happen next?
It doesn't matter if you agree or disagree with that content, the fact is that once you ban it you open the bureaucratic door to pinch little bits at a time at what is considered "safe" art. After they go after anime/manga, they will turn their eyes to all independent artists. Eventually, memes will fall under the umbrella of the same auspice. Finally, we won't so much as be able to post hand-drawn figures online without the same Karens calling it pedophilic, satanic, or some such other "ic."
It's all just more of the same. People claiming the moral high ground and beating you down. Bullies in positions of authority...
Music will be restricted to no longer allow cursing or "problematic" themes. Shows would all be required to pass "royal road" checks to be aired. YouTube would be reduced to nothing more than a modern-day America's Funniest Home Videos...
And that's just the start.
All it really is is nothing more than a choke hold on fun. Depressed and spiteful creatures willing to toss your game console out the window because you aren't paying attention to them. They'll bitch and moan about what you're doing, but in reality it's not what you're doing nor the moral values it represents, but the simple fact that they aren't being worshipped and praised.
Hyper-conservatives did this when they pushed against rock-and-roll.
Hyper-liberal bitches did this during segregation with their "separate but equal" mantras.
Hyper-conservatives did this even during the 90's and the various edgy toys and games that came about like Mortal Kombat.
Hyper-liberal woke are doing it now, inserting politics and demanding the gaming industry, for example, bend to their interests despite them never playing anything more intense than angry-birds or candy crush.
We have to be very careful not to hand the keys to fun from one overbearing Karen with blue hair to another overbearing Karen with red hair. Both hate memes, which should tell you everything you need to know about them. Red or blue paint, they'll still suck the fun out of your life because they can't stand other people having fun while they sulk and scheme like the Grinch.
Probably more of a rant than you'd have expected...
"Probably more of a rant than you'd have expected..."
LOL! I was thinking more along the lines of this being an organic transition -- that people would long for the days when we were morally inclined to do good and would work together to achieve a better world and rid ourselves of this leftist baggage.
That's why the Cabal is pushing the trans and drag stuff so far. They create a boogeyman, kill the boogeyman, and then get everyone to hold them up as heroes. It's all just controlled opposition, artificially putting them in seats of power.
They know people are begging for a return to sanity, which is why they always have a contingent of RINOs seated and on stand-by to take the reigns once the other side is done raising up stink people will desperately sell their souls to be rid of.
The pining for a return to a moral, nuclear family can absolutely be used against us. Just like with their Central Banking Digital Currency scheme. Destroy the financial sector, blame it on liberal spending, then offer the solution by way of a One-World-Currency to relieve all the stress and fear people now have after waking up and being told their bank can't afford to give them their paycheck.
It's the time tested bait-and-switch.
Again, so long as Tyranny is the end result, they don't care what color flag they wave.
Ive been talking about the pendulum swinging back for years. It has always been this way. I have cautioned here many times to tone down the rhetoric and that tyranny from the right is just as dangerous as tyranny on the left. Both sides use death squads.
Without a doubt this is comms. Its definitely a signal of a new phase or shift in plans.
WH or BH? Im not sure but you would think the BHs wouldnt be doing comms on OANN. Is this originally from OANN or did they pick it up from another news service? The originator would give us a clue, Id think.
Bring back monarchism
u/sleepydude Agreed.
The fraud of all governments (at least all the main ones of the "modern" world) is the claim of the right to dictate the behavior, along with claims of ultimate property ownership, of some loosely defined group of peoples (typically called a "Nation").
Every person, no matter their "station" in life, nor where they hail from, is the Ultimate Authority of their own lives (AKA Sovereign). Every government, including the United States, makes claims to the Right to dictate limits on the choices of the people, and their property. The only difference between the US and any other government of note (including all Monarchies) is that the US pretended to be different. There are notable places within the Constitution itself which prove the pretense false.
Monarchy means "ruled by one" but in the practice of the European Monarchies, they made claim to be Sovereign over the people through "Divine Right." That's how the Monarchies sold it, but of course the only way they could sell it was by driving the belief, through the doctrine of The Church, that we are Separate from Source. If we aren't separate from Source, then we are Sovereign ourselves. If we are separate from Source, then we must do what the people who aren't separate from Source (Kings and Queens) dictate.
That is the same fraud that all governments have perpetrated going back thousands of years. The Priest class and the Ruling class have invariably been the same class (except when the Priest class was higher).
The US is a little different in that it creates the fraud through lip service to individual Sovereignty, but then uses explicit statements of government as Sovereign. Such statements can be found within its founding documents (5th Amendment e.g.). The worst offense, from the beginning, and the way the fraud was perpetrated, was that there was no explicit statements of such individual Sovereignty contained within the Constitution itself, and only implicit statements within the DOI. From these loose foundations it was trivial to create the Aristocracy we have always had, from day one.
Wouldn't work. Never does.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Samuel%208&version=NIV