The best data wasn't provided by "strangers". The best data was:
The lack of data
Censorship
State violence and coercion
Any one of these should have tipped you off. None of these points requires you to trust anyone. Just basic principles you probably learned in primary school you dumb, clotted up, troglodyte.
I would say there was a lot of data, generally obfuscated and deliberately of poor quality, but the correct interpretation was still clear. And of course the best data was kept carefully hidden.
Another tell was "scientists" making obviously false claims like masking being effective.
I think Scott played the long con on everyone. He did a similar short con with Trump where he pretended to be centric.
The dude has nothing but time and freedom to do whatever bullshiit he wants. I think it’s possible he played his own character only to come back around after 3 years to pretend that he got it all wrong.
Today he said he should run against Adam for Feinstein’s seat, Elon agreed. Great comments & more red pilling on Twitter these days, it’s kinda fun now.
I’m thrilled to hear this , I’m not on Twitter never been a techie , this , GA, is my first experience on any kind of board or social media ! I should join just to red pill !
Adams is not doing a mea culpa. He still has an elitist attitude that cannot understand how people that he views as untermensch got this right, somehow by luck, and he made the wrong choice. He is struggling to figure this out because it does not fit with his view of how the world order works. He and his tribe are supposed to be the "intelligent" ones. The dumb ass can't figure it out that it is not about following the "right" people. Now he is requesting names of others to trust that he can follow. That is what got him in trouble in the first place - following others and not thinking for himself. These elitists are indoctrinated to follow their tribe - even if it means following them off a cliff. It sucks to be him. The one small consolation in all this for all the misery that they have put the rest of us through, is the fact that Adams, and people like him, will now have to spend their time being worried about what will happen to them. Maybe, just maybe, there will be a large serving of humble pie in all of this. But I am not holding my breath. He is still an arrogant pompous ass.
Agreed. When he asked how did we see it I said
"How did you not see it? If you don't know how by this point, then you still don't see. So, once again....how did you and how do you not see it?"
He didn't get it and still doesn't get it. He needs to find his answers on his own at this point. If I am going to tell someone you were right I would have already come across the information that clearly shows me that person was right. So why is he saying we were right but still so lost?
The first logical fallacy here is that there were two narratives two choose from, I still haven’t decided what is true, so I have a number of narratives in my head.
How can people be this stupid? We do not trust strangers to give us information, we listen to them and then apply our own filters of common sense and corroboration. Damn...
I am leery of the "accurate data" in quotes and the 'strangers I should trust' as if the pfizer and moderna paid doctors were his bosom buddies. Could just be being suspicious.
The government and the media always has your best interests as their number one priority.
or
They are conspiring against you.
I may have committed a logical fallacy here. But (1.) can be easily ruled out by the presence of advertising. And the government never did anything wrong to anybody. /s
The best data wasn't provided by "strangers". The best data was:
Any one of these should have tipped you off. None of these points requires you to trust anyone. Just basic principles you probably learned in primary school you dumb, clotted up, troglodyte.
Lol “clotted up “ !
I would say there was a lot of data, generally obfuscated and deliberately of poor quality, but the correct interpretation was still clear. And of course the best data was kept carefully hidden.
Another tell was "scientists" making obviously false claims like masking being effective.
Seems like total sarcasm
Especially the scare quotes on "accurate data", as if it wasn't
I think Scott played the long con on everyone. He did a similar short con with Trump where he pretended to be centric. The dude has nothing but time and freedom to do whatever bullshiit he wants. I think it’s possible he played his own character only to come back around after 3 years to pretend that he got it all wrong.
Small brain explanation: He needed those government funds for pushing the vax to try and keep his trophy wife happy.
Big brain explanation: We are watching a movie.
What an ass.
This dude is such a dissapointment.
Today he said he should run against Adam for Feinstein’s seat, Elon agreed. Great comments & more red pilling on Twitter these days, it’s kinda fun now.
I’m thrilled to hear this , I’m not on Twitter never been a techie , this , GA, is my first experience on any kind of board or social media ! I should join just to red pill !
If the sarcasm isn’t obvious to you, I don’t know if anyone can help.
Adams is not doing a mea culpa. He still has an elitist attitude that cannot understand how people that he views as untermensch got this right, somehow by luck, and he made the wrong choice. He is struggling to figure this out because it does not fit with his view of how the world order works. He and his tribe are supposed to be the "intelligent" ones. The dumb ass can't figure it out that it is not about following the "right" people. Now he is requesting names of others to trust that he can follow. That is what got him in trouble in the first place - following others and not thinking for himself. These elitists are indoctrinated to follow their tribe - even if it means following them off a cliff. It sucks to be him. The one small consolation in all this for all the misery that they have put the rest of us through, is the fact that Adams, and people like him, will now have to spend their time being worried about what will happen to them. Maybe, just maybe, there will be a large serving of humble pie in all of this. But I am not holding my breath. He is still an arrogant pompous ass.
Agreed. When he asked how did we see it I said "How did you not see it? If you don't know how by this point, then you still don't see. So, once again....how did you and how do you not see it?"
He didn't get it and still doesn't get it. He needs to find his answers on his own at this point. If I am going to tell someone you were right I would have already come across the information that clearly shows me that person was right. So why is he saying we were right but still so lost?
The first logical fallacy here is that there were two narratives two choose from, I still haven’t decided what is true, so I have a number of narratives in my head.
How can people be this stupid? We do not trust strangers to give us information, we listen to them and then apply our own filters of common sense and corroboration. Damn...
I am leery of the "accurate data" in quotes and the 'strangers I should trust' as if the pfizer and moderna paid doctors were his bosom buddies. Could just be being suspicious.
I don't think there is such thing as a "good stranger" you can trust in experimental medicine.
Clottbert needs to just take his 'L' graciously and move on to another topic.
Clott is a tool and an idiot. How about analysing the data and thinking for yourself rather than always looking for authorities?
Dear Scott,
Only YOU can prevent forest fires.
And by "forest fires" I mean neurons glowing red with embearassment. They kind of look like trees, don't they?
Nobody should be blindly trusted. Add Mike Adams at NaturalNews to your list. He makes some good points that are worth consideration.
I commented a few days ago. Suggested he was trolling us, and probably was paid to push the vaxx. Now he acts innocent.
What's more likely?
or
I may have committed a logical fallacy here. But (1.) can be easily ruled out by the presence of advertising. And the government never did anything wrong to anybody. /s
...and the media. Oh wait, that's the same thing.