Thread by @KimDotcom on Thread Reader App
@KimDotcom: It’s undeniable that Covid-19 was created in the Wuhan lab with US Govt funding and that the cleavage site in the spike protein was inserted in the lab to achieve maximum transmissibility in humans. Let’...…
How do we know it was created in Wuhan and not in Ukraine?
Quite.
A long time ago now, George Webb suggested that the virus research started out in the USA. When it became legally problematic it was moved outside the country. That appears to be standard practice: First you get the US taxpayer to foot the bills then if things look promising the research is moved into the private sector (to prevent FOIA) and abroad to make any investigation difficult.
My guess would be a move to Ukraine next and then at roll-out time Wuhan was made the fall guy and other centres were also selected. Italy looks like one. Wuhan would be a good choice because it's in China so western jurisdiction is restricted, they have a lab that could have done it, even if they are fully investigated they will find nothing if it was all done in Ukraine.
Sounds like a plan to me!
Could have been created in Ukraine and released in Wuhan. Not like China wouldn’t sacrifice a large swath of their own people to weaken Western powers. Also it’s not like Western governments in cahoots with the WEF and WHO wouldn’t sacrifice citizens and work in conjunction with the Chinese to install their Socialist agenda.
Why does the answer need to be either/or? Why cant it be both were researching it and sharing data? We already know Ralph Baric at UNC was researching along these lines. There were probably labs all over the world testing against different genomes, using different but related pathogens, and sharing this research amongst themselves.
These biolabs worldwide were all complicit and receiving taxpayer money all towards the same ends. Bill Gates recent "new pandemic" comments confirm this. And we know that Ukraine was sharing info with biolabs in the former SSR of Georgia.
This is a tangled web. Purposely tangled. It provides cover for the op and plausible deniability for the principles.
What do we think about this guy. Prime has a documentary on him. I've heard and seen the name many times. I watched the documentary. While they are on 2 opposite sides of the spectrum (I think) his story reminded me of Trump. He upset the powers that be and they tried everything in their power to destroy him. Including raiding his house unlawfully I'm New Zealand. He spoke of the Five Eyes and their corruption and so on.
Kim Dotcom scammed advertisers while hosting pirated software, music, movies, and child pornography on megaupload which he knew was there. He has made great connections in the industry as most botmasters who are morally bankrupt do. He's a male Eliza Bleu in that they're hoping people forget about their past and give them free passes. Do not trust these people, sure they may speak some truths but they were not the first and they do not have anyone's interests other than themselves in mind, tho it may seem that way sometimes. Sorry to pop ur bubble.
Sometimes it does take a thief to catch a thief, it is nice to hear him challenge the mainstreamers... but its wasted airtime that could be filled with more reputable speakers.
Imo it came from Ukraine. It was weaponized there. Sent to Canada and Trudeau oops it to Wuhan knowing they would release it accidentally or on purpose I don’t know but I think by accident they just didn’t know what it was. That’s where the Dominoes line up best.
Exactly , Like when people say YouTube algorithm is broken....I feel the facepalm emoji.
YouTube’s algorithms works Perfectly as intended with only 1 function that simultaneously (Creates Cognitive Dissonance by) Ability of YouTubes admin to any video instantly with nebulous and vague reaches to correlate with some poorly arguments TOS terms. And (Creates Cognitive Dissonance by) Method for ANYONE and Bots to false flag channels, brands, penanantly destroying livelihoods, with a lie to make channels have to consider and not rule out it’s coming from natural effects.
Ads, audience financial engagement, and creators making income etc are just smokescreens. Sucks because I know they are factually the Most basic and obvious components, aka a truly logical answer . Our challenge is to endure this massive scope of most people who proclaim from jump street they won’t accept the ads and user incentives ‘bUsinesS MoDeL’ played ZERO past, present, or future into the entity.