But you're insufferable. When you say people are using "cabal history" as their source, well then friend, the onus falls on you to prove why that history is incorrect. If you cannot prove it and give the "true history", with source, not belief, well then you're dangerously close to strawman territory.
"Everything is a lie!" doesn't prove what you're saying, though I'm sure it makes your feel better. And this goes for everyone here too. Everything is a lie is the easy way to cover for not having any answers.
Because old history did not have the logging technologies as we do now.
How you record history matters does it not?
When I took history in high school.
Our teacher sent 5 people in the hall.
He called one person in to tell them a small story.
Then he told them to call another person in and tell th them the same story.
We repeated the process until the last person.
He told us.
Do you see how much the story has changed once the original source was passed down from person to person?
He was teaching us to understand that most old history has been altered so much. That we have to be careful when committing to any historical point of view.
Many here know a tiny bit and consider themselves awake. They are still dreaming and don’t realize it. Maybe we are all still asleep, but shouting wake up in a dream is pointless unless you are aware that you are dreaming.
What I find interesting about this board in general is.
This board is supposed to be about repelling people. The red pill is understanding that most history is a lie.
But yet.
People on this board still act Tribal. Then when you ask them to defend themselves.
They will put Cabal history as the source. LOL!!!!
Apologies for being extremely late to the party here, but I just saw this post and could not pass it up without throwing in my 2 cents.
I 100% agree with the sentiment here and it's something I find particularly obnoxious about many Anons.
They will dismiss pretty much anything that counters their claims with sweeping dismissals of anything put out by the government or MSM. No matter what it is.
But if they think it might support something they're claiming? They eagerly perform fellatio on the MSM and the government. Simultaneously. It's quite the sight to see.
Where are they getting their numbers on the statistics of black crime? Whose news articles are they reading telling them about "inner city crime"?
It's nothing but hypocrisy and prejudice, plain and simple. And it's pretty damn common here.
The better question should be.
What if the Cabal used their power to get rid of Criminals?
What if the Cabal stopped stealing resources, making nations poor, and making nations into shitholes.
WANT PROOF?
Look at what they are doing to this country. If they win.
Future countries will call America a bunch of low-IQ shithole people.
What I find interesting about this board in general is.
This board is supposed to be about repelling people. The red pill is understanding that most history is a lie.
But yet.
People on this board still act Tribal. Then when you ask them to defend themselves.
They will put Cabal history as the source. LOL!!!!
I don't even disagree with you, necessarily.
But you're insufferable. When you say people are using "cabal history" as their source, well then friend, the onus falls on you to prove why that history is incorrect. If you cannot prove it and give the "true history", with source, not belief, well then you're dangerously close to strawman territory.
"Everything is a lie!" doesn't prove what you're saying, though I'm sure it makes your feel better. And this goes for everyone here too. Everything is a lie is the easy way to cover for not having any answers.
Common sense tells you I am correct.
Because old history did not have the logging technologies as we do now.
How you record history matters does it not?
When I took history in high school.
Our teacher sent 5 people in the hall.
He called one person in to tell them a small story.
Then he told them to call another person in and tell th them the same story.
We repeated the process until the last person.
He told us.
Do you see how much the story has changed once the original source was passed down from person to person?
He was teaching us to understand that most old history has been altered so much. That we have to be careful when committing to any historical point of view.
Many here know a tiny bit and consider themselves awake. They are still dreaming and don’t realize it. Maybe we are all still asleep, but shouting wake up in a dream is pointless unless you are aware that you are dreaming.
Well said
Apologies for being extremely late to the party here, but I just saw this post and could not pass it up without throwing in my 2 cents.
I 100% agree with the sentiment here and it's something I find particularly obnoxious about many Anons.
They will dismiss pretty much anything that counters their claims with sweeping dismissals of anything put out by the government or MSM. No matter what it is.
But if they think it might support something they're claiming? They eagerly perform fellatio on the MSM and the government. Simultaneously. It's quite the sight to see.
Where are they getting their numbers on the statistics of black crime? Whose news articles are they reading telling them about "inner city crime"?
It's nothing but hypocrisy and prejudice, plain and simple. And it's pretty damn common here.
LOL!!
I 100% agree.
One minute they say "Don't trust the FBI".
Then the next minute they point to the FBI crime stats as evidence.
You can't make this shit up lol.
You don't need any history to understand that being racially suicidal is not a good idea.
It says thou shall now kill. This is a common sense law.
Race has nothing to do with this,