SCOTUS on Brunson case, This Friday?
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
Lets see what happens...
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
Nothing is going to come of this because the remedy Brunson is seeking is that the SCOTUS remove sitting members of the Executive and Legislative branches of the government. SCOTUS has ZERO authority to do this. This is why SCOTUS didn't pick the case to even be read the first time around.
I think this is the key. I don't know any way that SCOTUS can remove a sitting member of congress. Not adhering to their oath of office is bad, but I don't know if the constitution carries a penalty. Please advise if you know any. Even treason requires a trial in the senate. The time to carry out 388 treason cases would exceed their term. While Brunson might be correct on the merits, what's the remedy? For myself, I have won court cases, and walked away with nothing. Sucks. Removing a sitting member of congress, by SCOTUS, might be illegal. Interesting constitutional crisis.
Creating a Constitutional crisis is the point. That's the only way to lawfully allow the military to take control.
oh yeah, I like that! How else could you bring in the military without it being a coup? How better a way to prove the legislature is corrupt? Exec branch corrupt, legislature corrupt, courts corrupt and no authority for SCOTUS to fix it. MrBig, I think you've got it! I like that!
What does the constitution permit SCOTUS?
Do they not have standing you say? Shut ut tf down then. Stop using their legal game tools
With all respect, I didn't say they don't have standing. Actually they DO have great standing.
I'm just asking about the remedy. Where in the constitution does it allow SCOTUS to be the overseer to the legislative branch? It doesn't. 3 Co-equal branches. Where in the constitution does SCOTUS have the ability to remove any legislator? This is a good case, but no remedy. That's the problem. What's the remedy? Treason? That case must, as stated in the constitution, be herd in the Senate.
To be more clear. I was asking if SCOTUS got no standing, not the brothers pushing the case :)
Yeah, the remedy should have been a full investigation of the Legislative and Executive branches and their inability/unwillingness to uphold their oaths... conducted by the SCOTUS. Since no one else is apparently capable of bringing this up or questioning the scum who ignores all of their duties.