Thoughts? Too far out there?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (46)
sorted by:
Doesn't answer my question. If Vaccines are causing cancer and you want to hide it by creating a different event, how does it help to localize that even in a certain area? It wont help hide cancer proliferation in other areas.
You call what happened in Ohio localized!? That stuff went everywhere in the smoke and into the groundwater, the Ohio River, etc. It's going to get into the food and bioaccumulate in plants and animals all the way up the food chain and then how many places around the country get food distributed from that region? By the time it starts showing up and causing cancer in humans, it will be impossible to trace it back to this event.
Okay, you are now proving my point that this event is not going to provide cover for cancer caused by vaccines since (which was the thesis of the post), as you correctly observed, it will be impossible to trace it back to this event.
Yes and that's why it will provide cover. Because a sharp rise in cancer cases can easily be blamed on the chemical spills when a large percentage may actually be due to the jabs.
And we don't expect the government to distinguish between types of cancer, geographics or anything relevant, do we? They will cherry pick whatever data they need to support their propaganda.
Which is it?
or
This shit blew all over the East Coast. Watch the video in this post - it's not long. I'd say they picked a really great spot to have this disaster:
https://greatawakening.win/p/16aANBQibH/check-out-the-air-quality-at-sig/c/