For those that can’t follow Juan with David Nino, this is Ron with David Nino. And Ron is on point in a more simplistic video on where we are in this War. This is a must watch if y’all can’t hang with Juan O’Savin, and that’s all good. Ron and David discuss Trump’s “Warp Speed” in detail, the train derailments, and the Alien Balloons of Project Blue Beam. I have both Rumble and the more edited FluffTube links so everyone hopefully can tune in.
https://rumble.com/v2a83g6-david-nino-rodriguez-bidens-financial-disaster-and-trumps-new-dawn.html
Juan O’Savin is a fucking fraud.
• Funny how Juan O Saven just disappeared there for a while. Why does he never show his face, only his $3,000 shoes? Why do interviews with him never start with a bio blurb telling us what he has done and what his credentials are? Who is he? What's his real name? Why should we listen to him or trust what he says?
• Remember how he rounded up all the top tier Truthers for a private showing of the child sex trafficking movie? What happened to that? It was supposed to be released to the pubic in the Fall of 2021. Remember how they all came back raving about how great the movie was and how he took them out to eat at some elite place? Other than pushing his book and his incredibly boring movie that was just endless footage of those boots walking somewhere, what has he done for the Republic, for fixing our elections, taking down the Globalists? BE CAREFUL WHO YOU FOLLOW.
I can't say that about Juan. Too many things about him makes me think he's on the inside in some capacity. Who knows tho...
Hehehe. This is exactly what Mr. 07 wants people to think about him. Very carefully designed to do so, imo.
Compare with people like Kash Patel, or Mike Flynn. etc, These people NEVER give any hint that they are "on the inside" in any way except in a very normal way, but who thinks they aren't?
Compare with other people who constantly disavow being 'on the inside' but also put out well-thought analytical content that gets one thinking.
If anyone even gives off the smell of 'being on the inside" it pretty much means they aren't, imo. The ones who are are very careful NOT to give that impression, and even go on to disavow it. Some, however, feed off of it.
While there may be some good ideas and concepts coming out or being shared by 107, I fundamentally distrust his motivation or reliability, because of what he presents himself as.
I honestly don't fucking know who to trust. This has been a dirty time in our history. So many liars and fuck ups.,
Hell, even Trump recommended the vax. I still support him because people make mistakes. But I'm not going to point people out and judge them.
Dude is worth a ton of money. I don't think grifter is what he should be called. He doesn't really need it and the amount of money he made is probably nothing significant.
I don't know man. I dont know.
That's really a good starting point. As someone said "it's important that we learnt to be comfortable with not knowing".
Breaking that down: a lot of people struggle with "not knowing", and so they reject that which threatens their viewpoint. They cannot digest the cognitive dissonance. So, being able to admit to one's self that "I don't know" is a great, if not THE great, starting point.
But in my view, another critical point is learning who or what to "trust". Often, "trusting" someone implies signing over a sense of responsibility or authority to them. That's the wrong way in my opinion. A child "trusts" his or her parent, because he or she is unable to carry that responsibility. But the way a mature person trusts is different. It means, I will have faith in, and give credit to, this (other) person, but I am NOT reliant on them, or, if I am, I accept that the responsibility of trusting is mine, so that if that person screws up or makes a mistake, it's my responsibility that I trusted them, not theirs.
The immature victim mind 'trusts' someone else, but then blames that person or holds them responsible for the outcome.
Ultimately, I think one cannot truly trust another, even God, unless one learns to trust oneself. That doesn't mean you're infallible; it just means that you know and understand your own limitations to some extent, but that you also believe in yourself (in your ultimate good nature). Trusting in God but not trusting in yourself (who God trusts) is a false premise. Learning to trust God also means learning to trust God inside oneself.
If this has been a dirty time in our history, it's only because the dirt is coming to the surface. It has always been there, but it has been hidden, and we've been asleep to it. It's painful waking up, but it's necessary. Avoid the pain and you won't wake up....
I really had to do a total recalibration after Nov 2020, and Jan 20, 2021. I really had to question what the Q operation really was, what was going on. And, I had to confront the fact that what I thought would happen didn't, and that I just didn't know. For about 5 months, a recalibration took place inside me, and (I think) I came out a wiser person, more confident, and with more faith in what is actually going on.
Regarding 107, well, I have some distrust of him, but I accept that as my responsibility, not his. He has some ideas I really like, but at the end of the day, I'm simply not drawn to listen to or pay attention to him, and I trust what I am drawn to - that inner compass guiding me that draws me to certain things or people and not others - very, very much. It's manifests as a fusion of thought, feeling and inner sense, grounded in a waking appreciation for being in the presence of God.
The idea is NOT that "I trust this person" but rather that "I'm guided to listen to this person now because there is something God wants me to learn or understand through them at this time". Trusting them doesn't really come into it. Trusting God does. I trust God wants me to learn something here, whether the person is right, wrong, mistaken or has some good ideas. For me, that's 1000 times more important than whether I can "trust them".
I'll admit, ultimately, I really don't know who 107 is, so I'm not really too invested in my own conclusions. I simply accept them for what they are, I know they may well be fallible, I'm OK with that, and I just move forward. I'm certainly not drawn to 107, though I do have concerns about HOW or WHY some people listen to him.
Anything that draws people away from the position of listening more to God and trusting more in God and instead listening more to <someone> or trusting more in <someone> makes me feel cautious. But note, I certainly think God can speak through anyone. The question is, who are we listening to when we listen to someone?
At the end of the day, each of us needs to stand in our own responsibility before God and the world. As such, we need to reflect on HOW we think about or create authorities around us. That much, at least, I think I know. Kek.
I knew it🤪👎🤯
yes, cant believe you got 5 downvotes.
10
6
No. Noise/signal ratio is important.
Why all the downvotes? Dude has a point.