Reddit's mods are absolute SCUM.
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (23)
sorted by:
If it's the study I saw recently, it was on vaccinated patients only, so the results aren't particularly relevant to our demographic... The study goals are usually manipulated to minimize success of unprofitable products but I suppose it's always possible this was performed honestly.
I don't know any un-vaccinated who are getting sick any more. The vaccinated prefer to go to the emergency room and take expensive prescriptions anyway so I just let them.
I still have my prophylaxis box but I'm taking less of everything and focusing more on eating better. I dose up if I feel any discomfort that might be cold related, or if I'm in proximity to a huge group, but otherwise it's been life as normal for a very long time.
Like Paxlovid, IVM works best if you take it within 4 days of symptoms. The study for Paxlovid treated people within 2 days of symptoms (on average, I think). Most IVM studies average at about 14 days past the onset of symptoms, which I consider to be scientific misconduct given that antivirals need to be given when there is viral replication occurring. IVM taken past 4 days is no longer an antiviral treatment. It may be treating inflammation at that point, but it is not the best treatment for inflammation.
The study I'm referring to had pretty high IVM loads administered at symptom offset.
Basically on the surface it looked better run than average. The thing that really stood out to me is that the user group was 100% vaccinated... (EDIT: actually 84%...)
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2801827
I hadn't dug into it in much detail but the other thing I just noticed is I'm a bit unclear if fluvoxamine was considered the placebo??? Often the language describing the study methodology is quite tortured.
From the paper:
Infection is when symptoms start, not the time of exposure.
Within 10 days of symptoms/infection is way too long of a window. It needs to be 4 days to be a proper antiviral study. Again, the people who studied Paxlovid understood this. If they can, so should these authors. If they are waiting on a PCR test result, I imagine that moves the fastest time to treat in the wrong direction.
In my opinion, if you get so much as a slight headache, start taking IVM right away, and take a test and add fluvoxamine and/or nitazoxanide (per FLCCC protocols) if the test comes back positive. Personally, I skip the tests because I only get headaches when sick and little else was floating around in 2020-2022. In 2023, I would still skip the test and assume covid if someone else tested positive that I might have been exposed to, or were exposed at the same time as me.
It looks like they were A/B testing with fluvoxamine, with some "non active agent" as a placebo. Which, again, both of these drugs are useless as an antiviral unless they prove that these were taken within 4 days of infection.
The tests are completely worthless for determining if you have covid if covid actually exists and is not just rebranded cold. Remember there are many different coronaviruses out there and the pcr test using 40+ cycles can take the smallest snippet of coronavirus gene that are floating around everywhere during cold/flu season and magnify it to unrealistic levels. They have admitted the pcr tests cant tell the difference between cold/flu/covid.
The tests are total bunk and were designed to be a weapon of fear. Including the tests puts your entire thesis into questionable territory.
I agree. I suspect that IVM treats more than just covid, maybe most or all coronaviruses, in which case, the tests can still help you determine if you should take the drugs, but I agree, they may not be the best indicator for how much covid there is out there. When they were specifying a different number of PCR cycles for vaxxed and unvaxxed, that made them completely useless for public health research, but I am sure that it helped the vax propaganda.
Who even reads reddit?
Reddit is still useful for specialty stuff. All my welding and metals bros are in those groups
Ghislaine Maxwell was the top moderator for years. I even saw somewhere that she may have been behind the ownership of the whole thing. I have no sauce but the moderator part was well explained as being her.
Despicable!
reply to Jdsudz and say:
you could say the same about those with horse paste hesitancy too.
I've noticed that the vast majority of reddit posts in these communities are extremely low engagement. Most of the comments have absolutely no discussion going on between users. There are usually around 15 - 20 comments in each post of just straight one liner A.I. style generated responses. No response replies, or banter going on back and forth. I really do believe that the entirety of Reddit consists of paid shills, bots, and probably around 2 - 3 % actual real users.
The behavior of their moderators isn't helping matters. Reddit cannot be a financially sound business. Someone is paying their bills for them. Its not hard to guess who.
The movie "The Network" called them humanoids. We now call them NPCs. Basically, they are people acting under the influence of propaganda. There could be AIs, but propaganda is much easier to assume. Reddit could be defrauding their advertisers by adding AIs. I doubt that they would be able to keep that a secret for very long. It could also be that Reddit's user base no longer participates like it once did due to certain types of users leaving or platform changes that affects behavior. If I knew that moderators were likely to remove my post, I would probably post less.
There was popular r/covidvaccinated I think. At first it was full on ban anyone who spoke out. Then people started reporting symptoms. Then the mods must have abandoned the place because it's practically anti vax last time I checked. I was banned long ago for being part of NNN.
Reddit mods are inbred homos.
Prolly infiltrated agents of a foreign power
It was MURDER
This is precisely why the 2nd amendment was written. In case anyone ignored the 1st amendment.