What you call "Covid" was a whole bunch of different things. It's not "one dis-ease". If it were, everyone would have the same symptoms, which they didn't.
For those who felt they had a "new thing", the cause of this new thing was the throwing off of old/dead/repressed thought/belief that had hardened into the body. This is age-old wisdom that your ruling cabal wishes you not learn about.
And since everybody is holding different versions, strengths, and intensities of repressed trauma, false beliefs, bad information in their bodies that they have not yet released, everybody has different experiences in terms of symptoms, intensities and durations of illness.
And it's all part of the "great awakening". Light displaces dark. And most of humanity still unwittingly holds onto pockets of darkness in their minds, and therefore their body.
"Covid" was a wave of light displacing darkness. An explanation few are yet willing to accept. So be it.
What can be said with provable scientific certainty is that no such thing as a "virus" has ever been proven to exist. So there must be another explanation.
Im not doubting the possibility that i am wrong snd you are right. That because i was primed to believe this was a new virus that i then convinced myself the symptoms were diffirent.
However, as the other anon pointed out it did feel diffirent. I would say the main diffirential symptom is the loss of smell. While true that is not totally unique i have never heard of a flu or cold on this scale completely altering peoples sense of smell.
Mine has never recovered and this was 2 years ago, i am still unable to smell certain things. This is the same in atleast 4 people i know also.
Ghosty, do you experience phantom odors? It's been over a year since recovering from the Coof. Acutely, my husband and I lost our sense of smell. Certain smells began returning after about a month, but about 2 months into our recovery my husband says, "why do I smell smoke?". I didn't smell it, but got worried and began checking the furnace, outlets, anything that I could think of that may start a fire. What I had not told my husband was occasionally I would smell a strange odor; I can only describe it as a cross between microwave butter popcorn and something rotten....my husband's phantom odor was smoke or cigarette smoke. These phantom episodes became less frequent as 2022 went on. There are still times when I experience the phantom odors, but now my odor has turned into a rancid hot oil/grease smell. Not sure if this info will be of use to Morpheus...
Same for me and my wife. It’s been a little over a year now; it’s gotten a bit better but my brain still processes certain scents strangely. Anything vaguely nutty or savory — peanut butter, meat, coffee grounds — smells weirdly stale, burnt, ashy … you called it with the old oil/grease smell.
How many times did you get the cranial scrape "nasal swab" test?
I agree, Covid is different than flu/fever/colds/pneumonia, none of which are caused by any unicorn-virus however as none have ever been proven to exist.
I'm collecting data on the long-term loss of smell/taste issue and would appreciate your feedback. I can explain the short term loss, as the purpose was to curtail the appetite and allow the body to purge without having the extra job of digestion, which is the hardest work the body does each day.
But I cannot yet explain these cases of long-term smell/taste loss.
if it were the same disease, everyone would have the same symptoms, which they didn’t.
People have slightly different reactions to the same disease or the same drug all the time, often due to individual health and genetics. A 100-lb woman who’s never drunk before doesn’t have the same reaction to the same shot of vodka as a 250-lb man who’s been drinking for years. Doesn’t mean they didn’t get the same shot. People with preexisting conditions or unhealthy lifestyles generally had a harder time dealing with Covid.
While stress, including stress induced by trauma, can inhibit the immune system, adhering to false beliefs or believing incorrect information does not have such an effect. At best this would be the Placebo effect.
Covid was a wave of light displacing darkness
No, Covid was a DS attempt to start their Great Reset by instituting lockdowns, Covid passes, and election fraud. Anon efforts to expose the true origin and nature of Covid and its jabs are the wave of light, metaphorically speaking.
no such thing as a virus has ever been proven to exist.
Just because you deny the evidence doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. Viruses have been proven to exist, and if you want to contradict that, then you need to come up with a model for virus-based diseases that explains the symptoms and spread of such diseases more accurately and in a more concise manner than viruses.
People have slightly different reactions to the same disease
Of course they do. The reason is, perception is subjective. As such, a conflict event that might cause you to fear death, may have no effect on me, or vice versa. Additionally, the duration and intensity of the conflict event determines duration and intensity of the dis-ease. If I fear I'm going to die for a day, I get undetectable lung cancer for a day, followed by undetectable tuberculosis for a day. If I'm afraid I'm going to die for a year, I'm going to get easily detectable lung cancer for a year should I be foolish enough to get an "annual checkup". I'm actually perfectly healthy during this time, receiving more oxygen than normal to all my organs, which is the purpose of the excess lung alveoli tissue. Now, should I resolve my conflict and no longer fear death, I'm going to have a year of coughing up blood and blood in my sputum - aka "tuberculosis". Should I be foolish enough to run to an allopathic doctor in the western world, I'm going to be told I have quite possibly "incurable" lung cancer. If I'm in a poorer country, I will be told I have tuberculosis and given round after round of anti-biotics (against-lifes) which prevent the TB mycobacteria from removing the excess lung tissue, thus leaving an encapsulated cyst of the no longer needed lung alveoli. Should I then have the misfortune of moving to a first world country later on, and am foolish enough to get an "annual checkup" with a western allopahtic doctor, I'll now be told I have a "benign tumor" and will be heavily coerced into getting it surgically removed - an entirely unnecessary procedure that will only cause me more long-term harm.
Dis-eases are not caused by "germs" or "substances". Everything we've been told about them is 100% wrong. And this is easy to understand once you realize the germ theory model is a total lie, just as is the fraudulent "genetic dis-ease model" is a lie, just as is the "lifestyle/habits model" is a lie, just as is the "family history model", just as is the "carcinogen model" and on and on we go. None are even remotely accurate or true. Western medicine is 90% lies, the only saving grace is emergency/trauma care.
Your alcohol example is not an example of dis-ease, it is an example of a poisoning. It's immediate and the direct cause is evident. I drink too much for my size and tolerance level, my body has to go into overdrive to purge the poison. Simple.
While stress, including stress induced by trauma, can inhibit the immune system, adhering to false beliefs or believing incorrect information does not have such an effect. At best this would be the Placebo effect.
Stress is the wearing down of the body - lack of ease, pease, sleep, etc. can and often does lead to a period of vitality drain. Again, duration and intensity determine the degree of sickness. But, like your alcohol example, it's not the cause of a well-defined "dis-ease", but rather forces a period of heavy rest to rebalance. Stress/Anxiety is not the cause of any dis-eases like cancers, heart dis-ease, diabetes, fake auto-immune diseases, and on and on. Each of these has a well-defined and specific conflict event that precedes them. Now, could a certain conflict event ALSO cause one stress/anxiety. Of course. If I'm afraid I'm going to die, I get lung cancer as from the example above. That can cause me a lot of stress and anxiety, obviously, but in and of itself, is not the cause of lung cancer.
Here's a good example of what I'm saying. Imagine a presumably happily married couple, They have their normal issues and spats, but nothing out of the ordinary. One day the husband approaches the wife after dinner and tells her he wants a divorce. Just like that. The wife didn't see it coming. This is a "Conflict shock event". She's caught off guard and her own subjective perception of the event leads to her eventual dis-ease down the road. If she felt she becomes scared of what will happen to her, she gets bronchitis, whooping cough, throat/larynx issues. If she then has an existential/abandonment crisis on top of the the scare conflict, in time she gets pneumonia - water retention in the lungs. If she feels she can't earn a living to care for her children, she gets a starvation conflict which causes liver cancer. If she fears her husband will take the kids, she has a separation conflict and gets ductal breast cancer. If she becomes angry, she gets hepatitis. If she becomes extremely angry, she gets stomach cancer. If it turns out her husband was actually having a homosexual affair and perceives this as a "dirty conflict" and gets bladder or colon cancer. If she decides to retaliate and get revenge through a brutal fight over the property and money she gets pancreatic cancer. And on and on. There's a very specific biological reason for each that is initiated by her subjective perception of the situation. Her psyche makes certain tissue alterations to help her through the conflict. When she resolves her conflict, the psyche reverses the changes and this is normally we we "get sick". And to wit, another woman might be secretly relieved and feel liberated in this event. She doesn't get sick at all. This is a demonstration of the subjective nature of 'conflict events".
The Placebo/Nocebo effect is very real. The irony of this situation is, 90% of what we call "dis-eases" are already in the healing/restoring/rebalancing phase when we run to the doctor. And this is why you will hear of a thousand different remedies for all manner of dis-eases from people out there. The medication/herb/tincture/formula/treatment/healing-modality/etc. that they sought out had nothing whatsoever to do with their healing. It was already underway. And likewise, when the white-robed priest tells the patient they have cancer or some other life-threatening dis-ease, this creates a "diagnosis shock" and the patient spirals downward into all sorts of terminal illnesses, just from hearing the bad news from "the expert doctor". The iatrogenesis category of death statistics should be 100x what is attributed to it today.
No, Covid was a DS attempt to start their Great Reset by instituting lockdowns, Covid passes, and election fraud.
Well we agree on this. Imagine all the conflict shocks that resulted from this propaganda campaign. But the DS was well aware of the new infusions of light and how best to time their propaganda. I know several people, including 2 family members and 7 friends who swear up and down they "caught Covid" earlier in 2019 before it was even a "thing". The peak intensity of these light waves was 2020 so this is when the DS decided to put their propaganda into full throttle.
Just because you deny the evidence doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.
I don't DENY EVIDENCE.... EVER. I ACCEPT EVIDENCE always. You've got things backwards. If you BELIEVE in viruses, you have unwittingly ACCEPTED FRAUDULENT NON-EVIDENCE to come to your conclusions.
The truth is, nobody has ever produced even a modicum of evidence of the existence of viruses. From 1875 and the onslaught of the insane Louis Pastuer, until the mid 1930s, nobody could even SEE/FIND a so-called virus due to technological limitations as the electron microscope was not yet in use. But that didn't stop them from blaming all sorts of dis-eases on these theoretical boogeymen. Rabies, smallpox, polio, Spanish flu, etc. From about 1935 to 1954 scientific researchers frantically tried to find our boogeymen, but to no avail. Virology was dead in the water until Jon Enders came along and designed the fraudulent "viral culturing" technique which is nothing more than the poisoning of green monkey kidney cells. They take pictures of the decayed particles of this witches brew and say "here look, a virus"...and everybody blindly believes them to such a degree, they never even tried to purify these tissue particles and attempt to infect a healthy host with them - the ruse was that good. Talk about BLIND BELIEF IN AUTHORITY on steroids! The more modern "sequencing" techniques for allegedly finding viruses is really even dumber. They just assemble human RNA/DNA strands into their boogeyman in a software program and the brainwashed minions once again blindly believe. Funny how their tissue samples never contain a single FULLY INTACT VIRAL GENOME. All these brilliant researchers can ever find are tiny strands of what they fraudulent claim were once part of viruses. It's all a massive lie.
Viruses have been proven to exist,
Wrong you are. The above two MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES is what they call their "proof". You can BELIEVE them at your own peril if you choose. But the fact remains, nobody has ever found a virus in nature, in the real world, in the fluids or tissues of any living organism. Should you dare to investigate, you'll get a big chuckle out of their excuses - "there's not enough there" or "they're hidden within the cell membrane". Laughable excuses from the virologists. They want you to believe this while at the same time inducing fear into your mind that a person standing 5.99 feet or less away from you can conjure up a microscopic piece of spittle inadvertently sent in your direction that's teaming with millions of unicorn-viral particles. These two positions cannot be reconciled. It's pure insanity to believe such absurdities.
Then you need to come up with a model for virus-based diseases that explains the symptoms and spread of such diseases more accurately and in a more concise manner than viruses.
I did do this here on GA about 4 months ago for about a dozen different popular alleged "viral-diseases" - colds, flus, measles/rubella, mumps, chicken pox, spanish flu, polio, rabies, HIV, pneumonia and tuberculosis (bacterial). Those should be more than enough to satisfy your standards. Which one would you like an answer for? I'll point you to it.
Thanks for engaging with your counter-arguments. This is how we all learn. I've been intensely studying this topic for over 3 years now, since the onset of Covid. I too was once a virus-believer until I decided to stop blindly trusting the experts and find out for myself.
For your tuberculosis/lung cancer example, how does living in fear of death cause these diseases to manifest? Most people are at least partially worried about their mortality for (hopefully) brief periods, but not even a correlation between this state of mind and cancer/tuberculosis has ever been established. I myself have never had either of these diseases, either after bouts of existential crisis or more acute episodes where I thought I was about to die. Furthermore, you speak of excess alveoli tissue that the bacterium responsible for TB allegedly gets rid of, yet you do not explain where this excess tissue comes from or how the TB bacterium gets rid of this excess tissue. Why would the human body make excess lung tissue if it's just going to cause potentially lethal TB later?
IF germ theory is incorrect, then why were the lowest death rates during the Black Plague in Poland and Milan? The former saw low infection/death rates because of their high Jewish population with their stringent hygiene practices from the OT, and the latter because they burned down the houses of anyone who caught the sickness, with the sick still inside. Both extreme (for the time) hygiene and extreme (in general) quarantine measures slowed the spread, despite the fact that these people would have still been afraid of infection and death.
IF germ theory is incorrect, then how do viral and bacterial infections spread? We know they are contagious irrespective of the mental/emotional states of the spreader and recipient, which contradicts your model that sickness is ultimately caused by mental imbalance or stress.
IF germ theory is incorrect, then why does limiting human exposure to mosquitos retard the spread of malaria and other diseases? Again, humans are still concerned about contracting these diseases, so if it was their concern over their own health or mortality that made them sick in the first place, then limiting mosquito exposure would not decrease the probability of infection.
IF germ theory is incorrect, why then do SOME traditional vaccines work? Even back in the 1700's smallpox inoculations were proven to reduce the transmission of smallpox and drastically reduce its lethality.
Your divorce analogy makes no sense whatsoever. Why does the wife's worry about the future manifest as whooping cough instead of the flu? Why does fear of abandonment cause pneumonia and not muscle cramps? Why does fear of starvation cause liver cancer and not problems elsewhere in the digestive system? And how on earth does anger cause hepatitis, which is primarily an STD??? (Which strain of hepatitis are you referring to anyway?) You're randomly associating different fears with different illnesses with no rhyme or reason. This isn't even pseudoscience, it's pure conjecture with no rational basis.
Her psyche makes tissue alterations
How does the mind alter bodily tissue? What hormones specifically does the brain release to cause each of the diseases and disorders mentioned in your divorce example? I'd very much like to know which hormone stimulates hepatitis so that I can patent a procedure to inhibit this hormone and make millions off your hepatitis cure.
And this is why you hear of a thousand different remedies for all manner of diseases
You can hear about as many remedies as you want, that doesn't mean that they all work or work equally well. Personal hygiene, pre-existing conditions, other medications taken simultaneously, the specific mechanism a particular drug uses and whether it treats the symptoms or the root cause, all play a role in how well a given remedy works. Part of the job of doctors and pharmacists is to sort through all of these factors to give you the best treatment reasonably possible for your particular ailment.
I know of several people who claim to have gotten COVID in 2019 before it was a thing
Covid did exist in 2019, albeit in Oct/Nov. However, a simpler explanation is that the virus was released a few weeks/months before and the Chinese either didn't figure it out until Nov or kept it under wraps until they couldn't hide it anymore. Both of these explanations are far simpler than throwing out all of germ theory.
I'm perplexed by your argument that viruses were theorized in 1875 but not isolated until the 1950's, therefore viruses are bogus. Isaac Newton invented the theory of gravity, and to this day we've never "isolated" it, but we know it exists and can predict its effects with great accuracy. The seeds of germ theory go all the way back to ancient times; they may not have been able to see bacteria/viruses but they knew there was something that they couldn't see that spread by physical contact or just being around someone who was ill. There's a reason the hygiene laws in the OT are so strict.
[on viral culturing] they never even tried to purify these tissue particles and attempt to infect a healthy host with them
That took me two minutes to find. Of course you don't DENY evidence, you just can't bother yourself to look for it in the first place.
Lastly, you try to find a contradiction between those who say that viruses are hidden in the cell membrane and those who say that the viruses are in the spray from someone coughing or sneezing. The problem is that no one is saying that viruses permanently stay inside cells; once viruses replicate inside a cell enough the cell dies due having all its energy and nutrients used up; allowing the new viruses to spread elsewhere, especially through mucous membranes like in your nose and mouth. This is a basic tenant of virology that even I know as a layman; so this is a pretty blatant straw-man argument on your part.
So to summarize:
Your model for viral and bacterial-based illnesses depends entirely on psychoanalyzing the patient to see what they're state of mind is, then randomly assigning different fears or phobias to different ailments, everything from the common cold to lung cancer can be explained by whether someone's worst fear is abandonment or starvation. This model conveniently ignores all the people who get stressed out over something without getting sick, and all the people who get sick in spite of complete lack of fear or stress at the time of infection. Nor is there an explanation of what level of fear or stress is needed to trigger illness.
Then you assert that you don't deny evidence while simultaneously claiming that no viruses have ever been isolated from nature, when less than two minutes of searching reveals papers of viruses isolated from nature. If you're going to propose a new theory or mechanism in any field of science, your first step should be to try to disprove your own theory in every way possible, not ignore evidence that contradicts your theory. Any theory should be able to stand up to scrutiny.
Lastly, you have demonstrated a fundamental misunderstanding, if not a willful ignorance of, the actual principles of germ theory in an attempt to discredit it. If you want yourself and your alternate theory to be taken seriously, straw-manning your opponent is not going to get you there.
curiously, have you had covid? if you have you'd know its different.
I haven't been sick in over 40 years.
What you call "Covid" was a whole bunch of different things. It's not "one dis-ease". If it were, everyone would have the same symptoms, which they didn't.
For those who felt they had a "new thing", the cause of this new thing was the throwing off of old/dead/repressed thought/belief that had hardened into the body. This is age-old wisdom that your ruling cabal wishes you not learn about.
And since everybody is holding different versions, strengths, and intensities of repressed trauma, false beliefs, bad information in their bodies that they have not yet released, everybody has different experiences in terms of symptoms, intensities and durations of illness.
And it's all part of the "great awakening". Light displaces dark. And most of humanity still unwittingly holds onto pockets of darkness in their minds, and therefore their body.
"Covid" was a wave of light displacing darkness. An explanation few are yet willing to accept. So be it.
What can be said with provable scientific certainty is that no such thing as a "virus" has ever been proven to exist. So there must be another explanation.
Virus first researched in 1892 on tobacco leaves. It’s a thing.
Nah, this is actually one of the funniest attempts by mainstream SCIENTISM to fool the gullible masses.
Dr. Sam Bailey eviscerates this fraudulent "Tobacco Mosaic" story in 17 minutes - she could have done it in 5.
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/tobacco-mosaic-virus-the-beginning-and-end-of-virology:8
Louis Pasteur and everybody who followed him, right up to Fauci, are all liars and or easily duped tools of the establishment.
Im not doubting the possibility that i am wrong snd you are right. That because i was primed to believe this was a new virus that i then convinced myself the symptoms were diffirent.
However, as the other anon pointed out it did feel diffirent. I would say the main diffirential symptom is the loss of smell. While true that is not totally unique i have never heard of a flu or cold on this scale completely altering peoples sense of smell.
Mine has never recovered and this was 2 years ago, i am still unable to smell certain things. This is the same in atleast 4 people i know also.
Ghosty, do you experience phantom odors? It's been over a year since recovering from the Coof. Acutely, my husband and I lost our sense of smell. Certain smells began returning after about a month, but about 2 months into our recovery my husband says, "why do I smell smoke?". I didn't smell it, but got worried and began checking the furnace, outlets, anything that I could think of that may start a fire. What I had not told my husband was occasionally I would smell a strange odor; I can only describe it as a cross between microwave butter popcorn and something rotten....my husband's phantom odor was smoke or cigarette smoke. These phantom episodes became less frequent as 2022 went on. There are still times when I experience the phantom odors, but now my odor has turned into a rancid hot oil/grease smell. Not sure if this info will be of use to Morpheus...
Same for me and my wife. It’s been a little over a year now; it’s gotten a bit better but my brain still processes certain scents strangely. Anything vaguely nutty or savory — peanut butter, meat, coffee grounds — smells weirdly stale, burnt, ashy … you called it with the old oil/grease smell.
How many times did you get the cranial scrape "nasal swab" test?
I agree, Covid is different than flu/fever/colds/pneumonia, none of which are caused by any unicorn-virus however as none have ever been proven to exist.
I'm collecting data on the long-term loss of smell/taste issue and would appreciate your feedback. I can explain the short term loss, as the purpose was to curtail the appetite and allow the body to purge without having the extra job of digestion, which is the hardest work the body does each day.
But I cannot yet explain these cases of long-term smell/taste loss.
Lost my taste/smell and gained neuropathy in my extremities from my covid infection. I have never been the same since.
People have slightly different reactions to the same disease or the same drug all the time, often due to individual health and genetics. A 100-lb woman who’s never drunk before doesn’t have the same reaction to the same shot of vodka as a 250-lb man who’s been drinking for years. Doesn’t mean they didn’t get the same shot. People with preexisting conditions or unhealthy lifestyles generally had a harder time dealing with Covid.
While stress, including stress induced by trauma, can inhibit the immune system, adhering to false beliefs or believing incorrect information does not have such an effect. At best this would be the Placebo effect.
No, Covid was a DS attempt to start their Great Reset by instituting lockdowns, Covid passes, and election fraud. Anon efforts to expose the true origin and nature of Covid and its jabs are the wave of light, metaphorically speaking.
Just because you deny the evidence doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. Viruses have been proven to exist, and if you want to contradict that, then you need to come up with a model for virus-based diseases that explains the symptoms and spread of such diseases more accurately and in a more concise manner than viruses.
Of course they do. The reason is, perception is subjective. As such, a conflict event that might cause you to fear death, may have no effect on me, or vice versa. Additionally, the duration and intensity of the conflict event determines duration and intensity of the dis-ease. If I fear I'm going to die for a day, I get undetectable lung cancer for a day, followed by undetectable tuberculosis for a day. If I'm afraid I'm going to die for a year, I'm going to get easily detectable lung cancer for a year should I be foolish enough to get an "annual checkup". I'm actually perfectly healthy during this time, receiving more oxygen than normal to all my organs, which is the purpose of the excess lung alveoli tissue. Now, should I resolve my conflict and no longer fear death, I'm going to have a year of coughing up blood and blood in my sputum - aka "tuberculosis". Should I be foolish enough to run to an allopathic doctor in the western world, I'm going to be told I have quite possibly "incurable" lung cancer. If I'm in a poorer country, I will be told I have tuberculosis and given round after round of anti-biotics (against-lifes) which prevent the TB mycobacteria from removing the excess lung tissue, thus leaving an encapsulated cyst of the no longer needed lung alveoli. Should I then have the misfortune of moving to a first world country later on, and am foolish enough to get an "annual checkup" with a western allopahtic doctor, I'll now be told I have a "benign tumor" and will be heavily coerced into getting it surgically removed - an entirely unnecessary procedure that will only cause me more long-term harm.
Dis-eases are not caused by "germs" or "substances". Everything we've been told about them is 100% wrong. And this is easy to understand once you realize the germ theory model is a total lie, just as is the fraudulent "genetic dis-ease model" is a lie, just as is the "lifestyle/habits model" is a lie, just as is the "family history model", just as is the "carcinogen model" and on and on we go. None are even remotely accurate or true. Western medicine is 90% lies, the only saving grace is emergency/trauma care.
Your alcohol example is not an example of dis-ease, it is an example of a poisoning. It's immediate and the direct cause is evident. I drink too much for my size and tolerance level, my body has to go into overdrive to purge the poison. Simple.
Stress is the wearing down of the body - lack of ease, pease, sleep, etc. can and often does lead to a period of vitality drain. Again, duration and intensity determine the degree of sickness. But, like your alcohol example, it's not the cause of a well-defined "dis-ease", but rather forces a period of heavy rest to rebalance. Stress/Anxiety is not the cause of any dis-eases like cancers, heart dis-ease, diabetes, fake auto-immune diseases, and on and on. Each of these has a well-defined and specific conflict event that precedes them. Now, could a certain conflict event ALSO cause one stress/anxiety. Of course. If I'm afraid I'm going to die, I get lung cancer as from the example above. That can cause me a lot of stress and anxiety, obviously, but in and of itself, is not the cause of lung cancer.
Here's a good example of what I'm saying. Imagine a presumably happily married couple, They have their normal issues and spats, but nothing out of the ordinary. One day the husband approaches the wife after dinner and tells her he wants a divorce. Just like that. The wife didn't see it coming. This is a "Conflict shock event". She's caught off guard and her own subjective perception of the event leads to her eventual dis-ease down the road. If she felt she becomes scared of what will happen to her, she gets bronchitis, whooping cough, throat/larynx issues. If she then has an existential/abandonment crisis on top of the the scare conflict, in time she gets pneumonia - water retention in the lungs. If she feels she can't earn a living to care for her children, she gets a starvation conflict which causes liver cancer. If she fears her husband will take the kids, she has a separation conflict and gets ductal breast cancer. If she becomes angry, she gets hepatitis. If she becomes extremely angry, she gets stomach cancer. If it turns out her husband was actually having a homosexual affair and perceives this as a "dirty conflict" and gets bladder or colon cancer. If she decides to retaliate and get revenge through a brutal fight over the property and money she gets pancreatic cancer. And on and on. There's a very specific biological reason for each that is initiated by her subjective perception of the situation. Her psyche makes certain tissue alterations to help her through the conflict. When she resolves her conflict, the psyche reverses the changes and this is normally we we "get sick". And to wit, another woman might be secretly relieved and feel liberated in this event. She doesn't get sick at all. This is a demonstration of the subjective nature of 'conflict events".
The Placebo/Nocebo effect is very real. The irony of this situation is, 90% of what we call "dis-eases" are already in the healing/restoring/rebalancing phase when we run to the doctor. And this is why you will hear of a thousand different remedies for all manner of dis-eases from people out there. The medication/herb/tincture/formula/treatment/healing-modality/etc. that they sought out had nothing whatsoever to do with their healing. It was already underway. And likewise, when the white-robed priest tells the patient they have cancer or some other life-threatening dis-ease, this creates a "diagnosis shock" and the patient spirals downward into all sorts of terminal illnesses, just from hearing the bad news from "the expert doctor". The iatrogenesis category of death statistics should be 100x what is attributed to it today.
Well we agree on this. Imagine all the conflict shocks that resulted from this propaganda campaign. But the DS was well aware of the new infusions of light and how best to time their propaganda. I know several people, including 2 family members and 7 friends who swear up and down they "caught Covid" earlier in 2019 before it was even a "thing". The peak intensity of these light waves was 2020 so this is when the DS decided to put their propaganda into full throttle.
I don't DENY EVIDENCE.... EVER. I ACCEPT EVIDENCE always. You've got things backwards. If you BELIEVE in viruses, you have unwittingly ACCEPTED FRAUDULENT NON-EVIDENCE to come to your conclusions.
The truth is, nobody has ever produced even a modicum of evidence of the existence of viruses. From 1875 and the onslaught of the insane Louis Pastuer, until the mid 1930s, nobody could even SEE/FIND a so-called virus due to technological limitations as the electron microscope was not yet in use. But that didn't stop them from blaming all sorts of dis-eases on these theoretical boogeymen. Rabies, smallpox, polio, Spanish flu, etc. From about 1935 to 1954 scientific researchers frantically tried to find our boogeymen, but to no avail. Virology was dead in the water until Jon Enders came along and designed the fraudulent "viral culturing" technique which is nothing more than the poisoning of green monkey kidney cells. They take pictures of the decayed particles of this witches brew and say "here look, a virus"...and everybody blindly believes them to such a degree, they never even tried to purify these tissue particles and attempt to infect a healthy host with them - the ruse was that good. Talk about BLIND BELIEF IN AUTHORITY on steroids! The more modern "sequencing" techniques for allegedly finding viruses is really even dumber. They just assemble human RNA/DNA strands into their boogeyman in a software program and the brainwashed minions once again blindly believe. Funny how their tissue samples never contain a single FULLY INTACT VIRAL GENOME. All these brilliant researchers can ever find are tiny strands of what they fraudulent claim were once part of viruses. It's all a massive lie.
Wrong you are. The above two MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUES is what they call their "proof". You can BELIEVE them at your own peril if you choose. But the fact remains, nobody has ever found a virus in nature, in the real world, in the fluids or tissues of any living organism. Should you dare to investigate, you'll get a big chuckle out of their excuses - "there's not enough there" or "they're hidden within the cell membrane". Laughable excuses from the virologists. They want you to believe this while at the same time inducing fear into your mind that a person standing 5.99 feet or less away from you can conjure up a microscopic piece of spittle inadvertently sent in your direction that's teaming with millions of unicorn-viral particles. These two positions cannot be reconciled. It's pure insanity to believe such absurdities.
I did do this here on GA about 4 months ago for about a dozen different popular alleged "viral-diseases" - colds, flus, measles/rubella, mumps, chicken pox, spanish flu, polio, rabies, HIV, pneumonia and tuberculosis (bacterial). Those should be more than enough to satisfy your standards. Which one would you like an answer for? I'll point you to it.
Thanks for engaging with your counter-arguments. This is how we all learn. I've been intensely studying this topic for over 3 years now, since the onset of Covid. I too was once a virus-believer until I decided to stop blindly trusting the experts and find out for myself.
Wow, a lot to go over here.
For your tuberculosis/lung cancer example, how does living in fear of death cause these diseases to manifest? Most people are at least partially worried about their mortality for (hopefully) brief periods, but not even a correlation between this state of mind and cancer/tuberculosis has ever been established. I myself have never had either of these diseases, either after bouts of existential crisis or more acute episodes where I thought I was about to die. Furthermore, you speak of excess alveoli tissue that the bacterium responsible for TB allegedly gets rid of, yet you do not explain where this excess tissue comes from or how the TB bacterium gets rid of this excess tissue. Why would the human body make excess lung tissue if it's just going to cause potentially lethal TB later?
IF germ theory is incorrect, then why were the lowest death rates during the Black Plague in Poland and Milan? The former saw low infection/death rates because of their high Jewish population with their stringent hygiene practices from the OT, and the latter because they burned down the houses of anyone who caught the sickness, with the sick still inside. Both extreme (for the time) hygiene and extreme (in general) quarantine measures slowed the spread, despite the fact that these people would have still been afraid of infection and death.
IF germ theory is incorrect, then how do viral and bacterial infections spread? We know they are contagious irrespective of the mental/emotional states of the spreader and recipient, which contradicts your model that sickness is ultimately caused by mental imbalance or stress.
IF germ theory is incorrect, then why does limiting human exposure to mosquitos retard the spread of malaria and other diseases? Again, humans are still concerned about contracting these diseases, so if it was their concern over their own health or mortality that made them sick in the first place, then limiting mosquito exposure would not decrease the probability of infection.
IF germ theory is incorrect, why then do SOME traditional vaccines work? Even back in the 1700's smallpox inoculations were proven to reduce the transmission of smallpox and drastically reduce its lethality.
Your divorce analogy makes no sense whatsoever. Why does the wife's worry about the future manifest as whooping cough instead of the flu? Why does fear of abandonment cause pneumonia and not muscle cramps? Why does fear of starvation cause liver cancer and not problems elsewhere in the digestive system? And how on earth does anger cause hepatitis, which is primarily an STD??? (Which strain of hepatitis are you referring to anyway?) You're randomly associating different fears with different illnesses with no rhyme or reason. This isn't even pseudoscience, it's pure conjecture with no rational basis.
How does the mind alter bodily tissue? What hormones specifically does the brain release to cause each of the diseases and disorders mentioned in your divorce example? I'd very much like to know which hormone stimulates hepatitis so that I can patent a procedure to inhibit this hormone and make millions off your hepatitis cure.
You can hear about as many remedies as you want, that doesn't mean that they all work or work equally well. Personal hygiene, pre-existing conditions, other medications taken simultaneously, the specific mechanism a particular drug uses and whether it treats the symptoms or the root cause, all play a role in how well a given remedy works. Part of the job of doctors and pharmacists is to sort through all of these factors to give you the best treatment reasonably possible for your particular ailment.
Covid did exist in 2019, albeit in Oct/Nov. However, a simpler explanation is that the virus was released a few weeks/months before and the Chinese either didn't figure it out until Nov or kept it under wraps until they couldn't hide it anymore. Both of these explanations are far simpler than throwing out all of germ theory.
I'm perplexed by your argument that viruses were theorized in 1875 but not isolated until the 1950's, therefore viruses are bogus. Isaac Newton invented the theory of gravity, and to this day we've never "isolated" it, but we know it exists and can predict its effects with great accuracy. The seeds of germ theory go all the way back to ancient times; they may not have been able to see bacteria/viruses but they knew there was something that they couldn't see that spread by physical contact or just being around someone who was ill. There's a reason the hygiene laws in the OT are so strict.
Infecting an embryo with viruses to make more viruses is literally part of the viral culturing process: https://www.coursehero.com/study-guides/microbiology/isolation-culture-and-identification-of-viruses/
Oh look, they found viruses in Yellowstone National Park: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.231170198
And more from a Tibetan Glacier: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/scientists-extract-15000-year-old-viruses-tibetan-glacier-180978287/
That took me two minutes to find. Of course you don't DENY evidence, you just can't bother yourself to look for it in the first place.
Lastly, you try to find a contradiction between those who say that viruses are hidden in the cell membrane and those who say that the viruses are in the spray from someone coughing or sneezing. The problem is that no one is saying that viruses permanently stay inside cells; once viruses replicate inside a cell enough the cell dies due having all its energy and nutrients used up; allowing the new viruses to spread elsewhere, especially through mucous membranes like in your nose and mouth. This is a basic tenant of virology that even I know as a layman; so this is a pretty blatant straw-man argument on your part.
So to summarize:
Your model for viral and bacterial-based illnesses depends entirely on psychoanalyzing the patient to see what they're state of mind is, then randomly assigning different fears or phobias to different ailments, everything from the common cold to lung cancer can be explained by whether someone's worst fear is abandonment or starvation. This model conveniently ignores all the people who get stressed out over something without getting sick, and all the people who get sick in spite of complete lack of fear or stress at the time of infection. Nor is there an explanation of what level of fear or stress is needed to trigger illness.
Then you assert that you don't deny evidence while simultaneously claiming that no viruses have ever been isolated from nature, when less than two minutes of searching reveals papers of viruses isolated from nature. If you're going to propose a new theory or mechanism in any field of science, your first step should be to try to disprove your own theory in every way possible, not ignore evidence that contradicts your theory. Any theory should be able to stand up to scrutiny.
Lastly, you have demonstrated a fundamental misunderstanding, if not a willful ignorance of, the actual principles of germ theory in an attempt to discredit it. If you want yourself and your alternate theory to be taken seriously, straw-manning your opponent is not going to get you there.