For me, the glasses are representative of a spell or enchantment placed on him - a glamour. And then you have They Live where the glasses are an antidote to the glamour.
I mean that’s just the selective stupidity/selective ignorance/ suspension of disbelief trope that authors use to get around plot holes when they don’t want to come up with more convincing reasons or plot points. The Super Hero franchises lean heavily on it. As do Horror Franchises. In fact the putting on glasses thing as a disguise is a trope all it’s own now.
Can’t exactly have a reoccurring character if Batman killed Joker the first time Joker went on a murderous rampage. Hence the strict “Moral Code”. 28 Days later good example in the horror scene. Only reason there’s a sequel is the Dude went and made out with his infected wife. Because reasons. And the Military didn’t have guards around the asymptomatic carrier of Uber plague because reasons.
That was Hollyweird telling us we’re stupid.
I always wondered if i was the only one who thought that was retarded.
No, there have been long time jokes about Lois Lane
Symbolism.
For me, the glasses are representative of a spell or enchantment placed on him - a glamour. And then you have They Live where the glasses are an antidote to the glamour.
I mean that’s just the selective stupidity/selective ignorance/ suspension of disbelief trope that authors use to get around plot holes when they don’t want to come up with more convincing reasons or plot points. The Super Hero franchises lean heavily on it. As do Horror Franchises. In fact the putting on glasses thing as a disguise is a trope all it’s own now.
Can’t exactly have a reoccurring character if Batman killed Joker the first time Joker went on a murderous rampage. Hence the strict “Moral Code”. 28 Days later good example in the horror scene. Only reason there’s a sequel is the Dude went and made out with his infected wife. Because reasons. And the Military didn’t have guards around the asymptomatic carrier of Uber plague because reasons.
Don't take life lessons from a 1930's comic, its fiction.
Except in reality a child would always be able to tell, because they have yet to be taught how to be blind.
That's a good one...