I think they say it's foreskin tissue because that's somehow less gruesome and more likely to be viewed as socially acceptable. But I think they're actually using stem cells from aborted babies too.
Foreskin contains a variety of helpful cells, but fibroblasts are the most abundant. These are most commonly extracted by scientists because they’re the main cell that composes connective tissue. Human foreskin fibroblasts (HFFs) therefore release growth-promoting materials like collagen, the body’s most plentiful protein, and help support tissues’ structural frameworks.
If they wanted stem cells, they would harvest them from the umbilical cord, which is rich in stem cells, so I believe they are using foreskins and I would venture to say that is why they push circumcision in the US, when it is not practiced in most other countries. And yes, aborted babies are a very hot commodity for a number of reasons.
It's you again Greekish...I love words and you are popping up in the craziest places...now I have to go see what EVERYDAY means...you could have just told us...haha
It reminds me that people may not realize they don't have to circumsize their boys. I had 2 that I did not circumsize...why donate to this insanity...but the pressure is very great...my 4 grandsons are circumsized...go figure...
The foreskin constitutes up to 75% of the capacity for sexual sensation and as a result the male will have 4.5 times (450%) more likely to suffer from erectile dysfunction, according to the British Journal of Urology International.
Women like Sandra Bullock's who smugly advocate her secrets of youth to the public are misandrous and wittingly or unwittingly being of the cult of Lilith. Despite keeping her religious beliefs close to her, there's good indication she is an atheist. I thought Isn't Sandra Bullock a Kabbalist?
I tried to count how many time DJT said "These people are sick." in his CPAC speech tonight. The Boss knows...No wonder all of Hollyweird spews vile hatred towards him.
"It turned out that all Ukrainian women are advised to abort because preborn children are excellent sources of organs and stem cells. Dr. Lazaryev found that the abortion rate in Ukraine is much, much higher than the official figures would suggest — in fact, about 1.2 million annually in a nation with a population of about 46 million, or more than six times higher than the abortion rate in the United States."
Not for the faint at heart!
A report from 1999: "There's something wrong here," the technician stammered. "They are moving. I don't do this. That's not in my contract."
"The technician uses the pseudonym "Kelly." She has her back to the camera, she wears a wig, and her voice is electronically modified because she says she fears for her life. Until a few months ago Kelly worked for a Maryland company called the Anatomic Gift Foundation. Her job was to procure fetal tissue for research. She worked at a Planned Parenthood clinic that was also a member of the National Abortion Federation. Her interview appears on the May issue of "Life Talk" video magazine--the first of a monthly series of videos released by Life Dynamics Inc., a renegade pro-life group based in Denton, Texas, that admits to having spies work in abortion clinics to uncover their most closely guarded secrets. ..."
In order to make enough profits, they need a lot more than the fat from liposuction procedures......like from the human trafficking that seems to be everywhere. IMHO
From the article: Baby boys are being brutally tortured every 25 seconds in the United States. Let’s not mince words about it. That’s what circumcision is – torture, sexual assault, genital mutilation, unconscionable child abuse, and possibly the worst violation of human rights in history.
The mother of an only-daughter, I really had no reason to research circumcision I had no idea of the horrors it entailed until recently. One of the moms in our peaceful-parenting play-date group enlightened me in the park last week. She sent me a few links, and I dove in. What a can of worms…
After several sleepless nights – and nightmares during the few hours I’ve slept – I almost wish I hadn’t opened it. But if I can stop one person from allowing his or her son to become a victim of this atrocity, it will be worth it.
To summarize what I have learned:
Circumcision is one of the most excruciatingly painful things that can happen to a person, much less to a wide-awake baby, too young for general anesthesia.
A violent attack of that magnitude has permanent and devastating psychological effects.
Mutilating male genitals deprives men and women of sexual pleasure, makes it difficult for men to connect emotionally to sex, and can therefore have detrimental effects on romantic relationships.
Circumcision is not “Christian.” It is unethical and evil no matter what your religion – so don’t use religion as an excuse.
All circumcisions were done without any anesthesia until the 1980s. The vast majority (96 percent as of 1997) still are done without any anesthesia today. Babies that do receive anesthesia are receiving inadequate local anesthesia, not general anesthesia, as they are too young for it.
In the “old” days, doctors claimed anesthesia wasn’t necessary because newborns couldn’t feel pain. As absurd as that sounds, countless studies had to be done to convince people that not only do newborns feel pain – they feel it more intensely than adults.
Though local anesthesia is probably better than nothing at all, it’s only slightly better. Studies show it does NOT significantly reduce the adrenal-cortisol (stress) response. Also, the injection of anesthesia is very painful in and of itself.
The foreskin is the most sensitive part of a male’s body – other than the head of the penis itself – with more nerve endings per square inch than any other body part. Circumcision has been likened to having a sharp metal instrument jammed under one’s finger nail, down to the base, and shoved around, back and forth, until the entire nail is separated from the nail bed, and then sliced off.
Here is a link to multiple circumcision videos worth a million words. Warning – I would not watch these if you don’t plan to circumcise. The images and sounds will haunt you. But if you are considering circumcising a child, please watch and pay close attention.
Because of this, circumcised men have been robbed of up to 75 percent of their capacity for sexual sensation and are 4.5 times (450%) more likely to suffer from erectile dysfunction, according to the British Journal of Urology International.
Circumcision is not a Christian ritual. In fact, it’s unchristian. Early Christians took a strong stand against circumcision.
History
My research: From the first century on, Christians took a strong stand against circumcision in the first century. Christians rejected circumcision at the Council at Jerusalem (Acts 15). St. Paul, the apostle to the gentiles, taught parents that they should not circumcise their children (Acts 21:25). In a reference to the old practices of genital mutilation, St. Paul warned Titus to beware of the "circumcision group."
Christians did not circumcise their children until only in modern times when it was “medically” promoted within the last hundred years. The procedure accepted for medical use essentially was the Jewish peri'ah. More will be explained about peri'ah later on. The claim for imposing circumcision was an attempt to prevent masturbation.
After several studies were publicized concluding circumcision was medically unnecessary, starting in 1983, Thomas Wiswell, M.D. (Wiswell is a common Jewish surname) began to produce a series of egregiously flawed studies that claimed circumcision reduced the incidence of urinary tract infections. The reasoning switched from the 75 year claim of preventing masturbation to preventing urinary infections. All of Wiswell’s studies have long since been thoroughly discredited.
The biblical circumcision was much different and far less invasive procedure than the Jewish peri'ah method. The circumcision of Abraham removed only the very tip that extended beyond the glans penis. Moses and his sons were not circumcised. (Exodus 4:25) Although Moses apparently prohibited circumcision during the 40 years in the wilderness, (Joshua 5:5) Joshua reinstituted circumcision at Gilgal after the death of Moses. (Joshua 5:2-10) It is interesting to note that after the Israelites were circumcised, they immediately became soldiers in Joshua's army for the conquest of Palestine. (Joshua 6:1-3). This suggests circumcision was used in the least to differentiate soldiers from the enemy.
In contrast to the Jews, the Greeks and the Romans placed a high value on the prepuce. The Romans passed several laws prohibiting circumcision. The laws were applied to everyone and were not directed against the Jews.
Much later in the Hellenic period, about 140 C.E., the Jewish authorities modified circumcision procedure to make it impossible for a Jew to appear to be an uncircumcised Greek. A radical new procedure called peri'ah was introduced by the priests and rabbis. In this procedure the foreskin was stripped away from the glans, with which it is fused in the infant. In a painful procedure known today as a synechotomy, more foreskin was removed than before and the injury was correspondingly greater. With the introduction of peri'ah, the glans could not easily be recovered, and so no Jewish male would easily be able to appear as an uncircumcised Greek. This radical modified procedure eventually was adopted by the medical profession and is the circumcision operation used today.
In Judaism, several methods of foreskin restoration were devised and practiced (create problem, pay for solution). It may have been at this time that the Pondus Judaeus (also known as Judaeum Pondum), a bronze weight worn by Jews on the residual foreskin to stretch it back into a foreskin, gained popularity amongst Jewish males. This lessened the ugly appearance of the bare exposed circumcised penis. This restorative procedure was known by the Greek word epispasm, or "rolling inward."
The third stage of ritual circumcision, the Messisa or Metzitzah, was not introduced until the Talmudic period (500-625 C.E).In Metzitzah, the mohel (ritual circumciser) sucks blood from the penis of the circumcised infant with his mouth. This procedure has been responsible for the death of many Jewish babies due to infection. The procedure accepted for medical use essentially was the Jewish peri'ah. Moscucci reports that circumcision was imposed in an attempt to prevent masturbation.
I learned about this, maybe 10 or so years ago. The video I watched seared my memory and I will never forget it. I totally agree with you. THERE IS NO NEED TO CIRCUMCISE a baby. And yes, it is pure torture for no good reason of health. The reasons they trot out are lies. Guaranteed that the medical cartel are making out like bandits on this. GIVE THEM NO MORE.
I have come to believe it is a form of human sacrifice. As I mentioned in my post, the radical procedure called peri'ah was introduced by Phariseeic rabbis and was ritualized. This practice also is the 3rd stage of ritual circumcision, the Messisa or Metzitzah as it is called, was not introduced until the Talmudic period (500-625 C.E). In Metzitzah, the mohel (ritual circumciser) sucks blood from the penis of the circumcised infant with his mouth.
This practice is reticently guarded by rabbinic cultism. Otherwise if known, any reasonable conversation ends in disgust or a subservient obedience to rabbinical authoritism. Nevertheless, there is far more of explanation why such a outrageous ritual continues to exist.
Human Sacrifice
The long history of human sacrifice has always centered around blood. In Luciferian influenced rites, drinking the blood is extant. In the context of ritual child human sacrifice, inducing terror in the victim releases adrenochrome into the bloodstream. Children are preferred in human sacrifices for the amount of adrenochrome released.
Again, the foreskin is the most sensitive part of a male's body, containing as many as 70,000 erogenous nerve-endings. With nerve-endings there are many capillaries supplying them. An infant exposed to the peri'ah procedure of circumcision causes adrenochrome to be released into the bloodstream. The infant is horrifically terrorized during this procedure. The infant experiences excruciating pain for the first time. Imagine being born and the first impression of the world is agonizing sexual torture. The baby’s bloodcurdling screams turn into what sounds like him swallowing his tongue. The trauma is so severe in one study circumcised baby boys exhibit symptoms of PTSD at 6 months of age, compared to uncircumcised boys. The emotional scars last lifetimes. When the Metzitzah ritual is performed and the mohel, using a sharp instrument to open the gaping wound, it is certain adrenochrome is produced in the blood and reason why the practice of a mohel (ritual circumciser) sucks the blood from the wound of the penis with his mouth. It is ritualized human sacrifice.
When Sandra Bullock smugly boasts about her beauty secrets using foreskins of circumcised infants, what is she really saying? We know adrenochrome has age-reversing properties. What does this really say about Sandra Bullock?
Bullock most certainly is aware of much of this; more than likely used or uses adrenochrome. Your description of the ritual where the blood is sucked from that terrible wound......makes perfect sense that it's the adrenochrome that is being produced. When I saw the video that I mentioned, I think I remember that some of the infants died from the trauma. Also realize that, trauma like that can produce cranial nerve damage, along with the rest of it. Shell-shock can produce similar cranial nerve damage. Thank you for the information that I did not know. Education will stop this, along with many other egregious wrongs. Blessings, friend.
Just realized that I misspelled it......correcting it.
This is one of the few things my husband and I strongly disagreed on and fought over. He's circumcised, so he said his sons will all be as well. I told him times are changing and all the studies were BS and have been disproven. I eventually gave in, so our boys are all circumcised unfortunately. 😩 With everything about COVID and vaccines, he might think differently now, but it's too late.
Sad to hear. I recall my wife and I discussed this too. I had ample studies I gave her and it caused her to become aware, but not moved. When I provide the biblical proof that it is not a Christian teaching and it was not practiced in the 2000 years of Christianity until only the 20th century in America, that became the key influencing factor to her to agree with me not to circumcise our children. The circumcision adopted in the US was not the same circumcision of the Old Testament by any measure. It was far less invasive. It is the radical peri'ah procedure we find now practiced. This original circumcision is not found in the annals of Western medicine or practiced, nor should it be. It is the teaching of Apostle Paul that presided over the Christian view on circumcision. Apostle Paul explicitly denounced the practice, rejecting and condemning those who promoted circumcision to Christians. Paul gave us a heads-up and warned that the 'advocates' of circumcision were "false brothers". And provides us there was a religious aspect to this appearing to represent a blood sacrificial offering. We certainly can see this today with Jewish ritual circumcision, the Messisa or Metzitzah. It is only Americans that have been sold this deleterious procedure. Now, we have learned where all those sacrificed foreskins go. Is it a form of cannibalism? It's Sick.
Thanks, I notice the same lurking trolls are down-voting me. It happens every time I talk about ritual sacrifices, kabbalah, and Luciferian evil. If you enjoyed, please up-vote.
I think they say it's foreskin tissue because that's somehow less gruesome and more likely to be viewed as socially acceptable. But I think they're actually using stem cells from aborted babies too.
Plastic surgeon in my town used the foreskin on a baby to create an eyelid that was missing at birth. Poor kid ended up being 'cockeyed'. LOL
When he rubs his eye, it swells up.
In high school worked at the zoo circumcising elephants... The pay wasn't great, but the tips were huge.
I had a job during summers in college. Had hundreds of people beneath me. Mowed lawns at the cemetery.
Foreskin contains a variety of helpful cells, but fibroblasts are the most abundant. These are most commonly extracted by scientists because they’re the main cell that composes connective tissue. Human foreskin fibroblasts (HFFs) therefore release growth-promoting materials like collagen, the body’s most plentiful protein, and help support tissues’ structural frameworks.
If they wanted stem cells, they would harvest them from the umbilical cord, which is rich in stem cells, so I believe they are using foreskins and I would venture to say that is why they push circumcision in the US, when it is not practiced in most other countries. And yes, aborted babies are a very hot commodity for a number of reasons.
EVERYDAY I come on this website, greatawakening.win, and ALWAYS LEARN something NEW...
OUTSTANDING COMMENTARY!!!
Here's something new: EVERYDAY doesn't mean what you think it means. (Look it up.)
It's you again Greekish...I love words and you are popping up in the craziest places...now I have to go see what EVERYDAY means...you could have just told us...haha
Is the answer that he should have used every day?
It reminds me that people may not realize they don't have to circumsize their boys. I had 2 that I did not circumsize...why donate to this insanity...but the pressure is very great...my 4 grandsons are circumsized...go figure...
The foreskin constitutes up to 75% of the capacity for sexual sensation and as a result the male will have 4.5 times (450%) more likely to suffer from erectile dysfunction, according to the British Journal of Urology International.
Women like Sandra Bullock's who smugly advocate her secrets of youth to the public are misandrous and wittingly or unwittingly being of the cult of Lilith. Despite keeping her religious beliefs close to her, there's good indication she is an atheist. I thought Isn't Sandra Bullock a Kabbalist?
They are sick
I tried to count how many time DJT said "These people are sick." in his CPAC speech tonight. The Boss knows...No wonder all of Hollyweird spews vile hatred towards him.
And most who hate Trump were wearing boots, crutches and ankle monitors.
They are harvesting us! And it is only logic what they do with the abortioned babies and the organ donations, or not?
Foreskin Facials:
https://knowledgenuts.com/bizarrely-profitable-business-of-baby-foreskins/
https://www.cosmopolitan.com/uk/beauty-hair/news/a35130/foreskin-facials-are-a-thing/
https://fashionweekdaily.com/cate-blanchett-sandra-bullock-facial/
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2018/dec/07/foreskin-facial-treatment-baby-salon-wrinkles
Soap made from human fat:
https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2019/mar/13/its-very-good-how-soap-made-from-siphoned-human-fat-left-audiences-in-a-lather
https://metro.co.uk/2018/10/31/fat-donated-by-liposuction-patients-is-being-turned-into-body-soap-8091841/
Organ donations = The 1-billion-dollar-per-year-donated-tissue industry:
https://www.chron.com/news/health/article/Some-donated-tissue-sold-for-cosmetic-surgery-1501934.php
Ukraine stem cell industry:
https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=7472
"It turned out that all Ukrainian women are advised to abort because preborn children are excellent sources of organs and stem cells. Dr. Lazaryev found that the abortion rate in Ukraine is much, much higher than the official figures would suggest — in fact, about 1.2 million annually in a nation with a population of about 46 million, or more than six times higher than the abortion rate in the United States."
Not for the faint at heart!
A report from 1999: "There's something wrong here," the technician stammered. "They are moving. I don't do this. That's not in my contract."
"The technician uses the pseudonym "Kelly." She has her back to the camera, she wears a wig, and her voice is electronically modified because she says she fears for her life. Until a few months ago Kelly worked for a Maryland company called the Anatomic Gift Foundation. Her job was to procure fetal tissue for research. She worked at a Planned Parenthood clinic that was also a member of the National Abortion Federation. Her interview appears on the May issue of "Life Talk" video magazine--the first of a monthly series of videos released by Life Dynamics Inc., a renegade pro-life group based in Denton, Texas, that admits to having spies work in abortion clinics to uncover their most closely guarded secrets. ..."
https://www.consciencelaws.org/background/procedures/organ001.aspx
Good info!
And just FYI, the old saying is “faint of heart”.
You are right, my writing was too quick :-(
😀👍
In order to make enough profits, they need a lot more than the fat from liposuction procedures......like from the human trafficking that seems to be everywhere. IMHO
Just the tip of the iceberg.
Thanks for the tip....
Don't circumcise your babies. Circumcision is Torture and Child Abuse The truth about the lifelong deleterious aftermath of the circumcised can be read here.
From the article: Baby boys are being brutally tortured every 25 seconds in the United States. Let’s not mince words about it. That’s what circumcision is – torture, sexual assault, genital mutilation, unconscionable child abuse, and possibly the worst violation of human rights in history.
The mother of an only-daughter, I really had no reason to research circumcision I had no idea of the horrors it entailed until recently. One of the moms in our peaceful-parenting play-date group enlightened me in the park last week. She sent me a few links, and I dove in. What a can of worms…
After several sleepless nights – and nightmares during the few hours I’ve slept – I almost wish I hadn’t opened it. But if I can stop one person from allowing his or her son to become a victim of this atrocity, it will be worth it. To summarize what I have learned:
Physical Pain
Warning: Graphic: Link to original picture
All circumcisions were done without any anesthesia until the 1980s. The vast majority (96 percent as of 1997) still are done without any anesthesia today. Babies that do receive anesthesia are receiving inadequate local anesthesia, not general anesthesia, as they are too young for it.
In the “old” days, doctors claimed anesthesia wasn’t necessary because newborns couldn’t feel pain. As absurd as that sounds, countless studies had to be done to convince people that not only do newborns feel pain – they feel it more intensely than adults.
Though local anesthesia is probably better than nothing at all, it’s only slightly better. Studies show it does NOT significantly reduce the adrenal-cortisol (stress) response. Also, the injection of anesthesia is very painful in and of itself.
The foreskin is the most sensitive part of a male’s body – other than the head of the penis itself – with more nerve endings per square inch than any other body part. Circumcision has been likened to having a sharp metal instrument jammed under one’s finger nail, down to the base, and shoved around, back and forth, until the entire nail is separated from the nail bed, and then sliced off.
Here is a link to multiple circumcision videos worth a million words. Warning – I would not watch these if you don’t plan to circumcise. The images and sounds will haunt you. But if you are considering circumcising a child, please watch and pay close attention.
Because of this, circumcised men have been robbed of up to 75 percent of their capacity for sexual sensation and are 4.5 times (450%) more likely to suffer from erectile dysfunction, according to the British Journal of Urology International.
Circumcision is not a Christian ritual. In fact, it’s unchristian. Early Christians took a strong stand against circumcision.
History
My research: From the first century on, Christians took a strong stand against circumcision in the first century. Christians rejected circumcision at the Council at Jerusalem (Acts 15). St. Paul, the apostle to the gentiles, taught parents that they should not circumcise their children (Acts 21:25). In a reference to the old practices of genital mutilation, St. Paul warned Titus to beware of the "circumcision group."
Christians did not circumcise their children until only in modern times when it was “medically” promoted within the last hundred years. The procedure accepted for medical use essentially was the Jewish peri'ah. More will be explained about peri'ah later on. The claim for imposing circumcision was an attempt to prevent masturbation.
After several studies were publicized concluding circumcision was medically unnecessary, starting in 1983, Thomas Wiswell, M.D. (Wiswell is a common Jewish surname) began to produce a series of egregiously flawed studies that claimed circumcision reduced the incidence of urinary tract infections. The reasoning switched from the 75 year claim of preventing masturbation to preventing urinary infections. All of Wiswell’s studies have long since been thoroughly discredited.
The biblical circumcision was much different and far less invasive procedure than the Jewish peri'ah method. The circumcision of Abraham removed only the very tip that extended beyond the glans penis. Moses and his sons were not circumcised. (Exodus 4:25) Although Moses apparently prohibited circumcision during the 40 years in the wilderness, (Joshua 5:5) Joshua reinstituted circumcision at Gilgal after the death of Moses. (Joshua 5:2-10) It is interesting to note that after the Israelites were circumcised, they immediately became soldiers in Joshua's army for the conquest of Palestine. (Joshua 6:1-3). This suggests circumcision was used in the least to differentiate soldiers from the enemy.
In contrast to the Jews, the Greeks and the Romans placed a high value on the prepuce. The Romans passed several laws prohibiting circumcision. The laws were applied to everyone and were not directed against the Jews. Much later in the Hellenic period, about 140 C.E., the Jewish authorities modified circumcision procedure to make it impossible for a Jew to appear to be an uncircumcised Greek. A radical new procedure called peri'ah was introduced by the priests and rabbis. In this procedure the foreskin was stripped away from the glans, with which it is fused in the infant. In a painful procedure known today as a synechotomy, more foreskin was removed than before and the injury was correspondingly greater. With the introduction of peri'ah, the glans could not easily be recovered, and so no Jewish male would easily be able to appear as an uncircumcised Greek. This radical modified procedure eventually was adopted by the medical profession and is the circumcision operation used today.
In Judaism, several methods of foreskin restoration were devised and practiced (create problem, pay for solution). It may have been at this time that the Pondus Judaeus (also known as Judaeum Pondum), a bronze weight worn by Jews on the residual foreskin to stretch it back into a foreskin, gained popularity amongst Jewish males. This lessened the ugly appearance of the bare exposed circumcised penis. This restorative procedure was known by the Greek word epispasm, or "rolling inward."
The third stage of ritual circumcision, the Messisa or Metzitzah, was not introduced until the Talmudic period (500-625 C.E).In Metzitzah, the mohel (ritual circumciser) sucks blood from the penis of the circumcised infant with his mouth. This procedure has been responsible for the death of many Jewish babies due to infection. The procedure accepted for medical use essentially was the Jewish peri'ah. Moscucci reports that circumcision was imposed in an attempt to prevent masturbation.
I learned about this, maybe 10 or so years ago. The video I watched seared my memory and I will never forget it. I totally agree with you. THERE IS NO NEED TO CIRCUMCISE a baby. And yes, it is pure torture for no good reason of health. The reasons they trot out are lies. Guaranteed that the medical cartel are making out like bandits on this. GIVE THEM NO MORE.
I have come to believe it is a form of human sacrifice. As I mentioned in my post, the radical procedure called peri'ah was introduced by Phariseeic rabbis and was ritualized. This practice also is the 3rd stage of ritual circumcision, the Messisa or Metzitzah as it is called, was not introduced until the Talmudic period (500-625 C.E). In Metzitzah, the mohel (ritual circumciser) sucks blood from the penis of the circumcised infant with his mouth.
This practice is reticently guarded by rabbinic cultism. Otherwise if known, any reasonable conversation ends in disgust or a subservient obedience to rabbinical authoritism. Nevertheless, there is far more of explanation why such a outrageous ritual continues to exist.
Human Sacrifice
The long history of human sacrifice has always centered around blood. In Luciferian influenced rites, drinking the blood is extant. In the context of ritual child human sacrifice, inducing terror in the victim releases adrenochrome into the bloodstream. Children are preferred in human sacrifices for the amount of adrenochrome released.
Again, the foreskin is the most sensitive part of a male's body, containing as many as 70,000 erogenous nerve-endings. With nerve-endings there are many capillaries supplying them. An infant exposed to the peri'ah procedure of circumcision causes adrenochrome to be released into the bloodstream. The infant is horrifically terrorized during this procedure. The infant experiences excruciating pain for the first time. Imagine being born and the first impression of the world is agonizing sexual torture. The baby’s bloodcurdling screams turn into what sounds like him swallowing his tongue. The trauma is so severe in one study circumcised baby boys exhibit symptoms of PTSD at 6 months of age, compared to uncircumcised boys. The emotional scars last lifetimes. When the Metzitzah ritual is performed and the mohel, using a sharp instrument to open the gaping wound, it is certain adrenochrome is produced in the blood and reason why the practice of a mohel (ritual circumciser) sucks the blood from the wound of the penis with his mouth. It is ritualized human sacrifice.
When Sandra Bullock smugly boasts about her beauty secrets using foreskins of circumcised infants, what is she really saying? We know adrenochrome has age-reversing properties. What does this really say about Sandra Bullock?
Bullock most certainly is aware of much of this; more than likely used or uses adrenochrome. Your description of the ritual where the blood is sucked from that terrible wound......makes perfect sense that it's the adrenochrome that is being produced. When I saw the video that I mentioned, I think I remember that some of the infants died from the trauma. Also realize that, trauma like that can produce cranial nerve damage, along with the rest of it. Shell-shock can produce similar cranial nerve damage. Thank you for the information that I did not know. Education will stop this, along with many other egregious wrongs. Blessings, friend.
Just realized that I misspelled it......correcting it.
This is one of the few things my husband and I strongly disagreed on and fought over. He's circumcised, so he said his sons will all be as well. I told him times are changing and all the studies were BS and have been disproven. I eventually gave in, so our boys are all circumcised unfortunately. 😩 With everything about COVID and vaccines, he might think differently now, but it's too late.
Sad to hear. I recall my wife and I discussed this too. I had ample studies I gave her and it caused her to become aware, but not moved. When I provide the biblical proof that it is not a Christian teaching and it was not practiced in the 2000 years of Christianity until only the 20th century in America, that became the key influencing factor to her to agree with me not to circumcise our children. The circumcision adopted in the US was not the same circumcision of the Old Testament by any measure. It was far less invasive. It is the radical peri'ah procedure we find now practiced. This original circumcision is not found in the annals of Western medicine or practiced, nor should it be. It is the teaching of Apostle Paul that presided over the Christian view on circumcision. Apostle Paul explicitly denounced the practice, rejecting and condemning those who promoted circumcision to Christians. Paul gave us a heads-up and warned that the 'advocates' of circumcision were "false brothers". And provides us there was a religious aspect to this appearing to represent a blood sacrificial offering. We certainly can see this today with Jewish ritual circumcision, the Messisa or Metzitzah. It is only Americans that have been sold this deleterious procedure. Now, we have learned where all those sacrificed foreskins go. Is it a form of cannibalism? It's Sick.
Thanks, I notice the same lurking trolls are down-voting me. It happens every time I talk about ritual sacrifices, kabbalah, and Luciferian evil. If you enjoyed, please up-vote.
DJT fired Jesse James from celebrity apprentice for cheating on Sandra.
A man's got to know his limitations....
Source, please? I'd like to see this w/out the jump cuts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BY2aOHQlAco&t=28s&ab_channel=ETCanada .. yep, they did indeed say it in the context.