1
Jesseroonie 1 point ago +1 / -0

"But you can't kill people with a fire extinguisher! " .. challenge accepted..

5
Jesseroonie 5 points ago +6 / -1

Only matters if we enforce the law. Look around you. The "justice" system has zero interest in law enforcement. Only political punishement.

4
Jesseroonie 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh, then you're negligent. That makes you absolutely unfit for your office, get out.

1
Jesseroonie 1 point ago +1 / -0

Source, please? I'd like to see this w/out the jump cuts.

5
Jesseroonie 5 points ago +5 / -0

He didn't mention Covid. He didn't have to. The lady doth protest too much, methinks.

5
Jesseroonie 5 points ago +5 / -0

And Thomas May reminds us that soldiers are people too. Although soldiers may relinquish their right to refuse medical treatment upon enlisting, they retain, as all humans do, their right to refuse to be subjects of human experiments-and so retain their right to refuse experimental or investigational drugs and vaccines, even in wartime. The Nuremberg Code is, after all, a wartime document and made no exceptions for informed consent for either war or the soldiers assigned to fight it.

0
Jesseroonie 0 points ago +1 / -1

My rights do not end where yours begin. My rights end when I inflict harm. Modern thinking fails when it assumes the purpose of law is to prevent harm. If the purpose of law is to prevent your neighbor from having the ability to inflict harm, then taken to it's logical outcome, you and your neighbor will be jailed preemptively. Nor is it the purpose to ensure you have rights only to what you need; that way lies the elimination of personal property rights. As the Bard wrote, "Oh reason not the need.." Your neighbor may not "need" a flamethrower now, but at some point, you might find you wish he had.

7
Jesseroonie 7 points ago +7 / -0

Because they want to be the last people standing forever.

1
Jesseroonie 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's correct. I feel the same way about knives, hammers, and cars, all of which can and are used to kill.

1
Jesseroonie 1 point ago +1 / -0

I respect your belief. Respect mine. I do see a reason, so restricting my rights due to your beliefs is an attack.

3
Jesseroonie 3 points ago +3 / -0

Doesn't hold. You argue against use, not possession. If I don't spook your cows, no harm done by my ownership. This same argument can be made about a .22.

2
Jesseroonie 2 points ago +2 / -0

Boone NC. Watching these folks hold onto their delusions, sorry, I mean masks, with all their strength.

1
Jesseroonie 1 point ago +1 / -0

"And if we continue to stay laser focused on getting shots in people's arms, responding to economic crisis, it's going to open up a lot of hearts, and a lot of doors for us tomorrow to do the many more things we know we have to do. So I want to thank you all. I really mean it, from the bottom of my.. Thank you, thank you, thank you. And I'm happy to take questions if that's what I'm supposed to, Nance, whatever you want me to do." - Biden, followed by test pattern.

OK, elephant in the living room; what a servile, disjointed, senile piece of crap.
But moving past that for a moment, listen to what's being said. This has zero to do with helping anyone, it's about gaining political leverage to continue a worsening agenda.

2
Jesseroonie 2 points ago +2 / -0

So what's the alternative? This is not a jab, it's a sincere question.

Everyone waits for someone else to act, because we have too much to lose.

I'm doing my part in taking chances by exerting influence, demasking, trying to wake folk up, but it feels like trying to rebuild the Grand Canyon with a chisel.

What can be done?

3
Jesseroonie 3 points ago +3 / -0

How do you reconcile that with satellites, and simple experiments that prove relativity by virtue of clock slippage based on time?

http://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html

How do you explain seeing the curvature of the earth from a tall building?

This discussion has been ongoing since Galileo, Kepler, etc. How do we explain hundreds of years of peer reviewed research by do many being wrong? Why would we bother?

3
Jesseroonie 3 points ago +3 / -0

The airport comment; a bus does about 65 mph, yet I can walk up the aisle. I can jump up the aisle. The air in the bus is moving at the same speed as the rest of it is.

Wonder if that's related?