Well done OP. Not at all surprising these unreliable news sources are in smear mode. Sadly, I can see exactly what might be going thru a normie's head.
Tucker said something?
Elon backed it up on Twitter?
Hmmm. maybe there's something to this.
Normie then proceeds to their browser bookmarked news source MSNBC, reads only the headline, and says "oh forget it. My MSNBC said its bogus. That what I thought. Let me see what funny clip is trending on tiktok right now."
How in the hell can you take NEW VIDEO EVIDENCE of an event and call it a bad thing? ..Oh wait...we're talking about the lying media here..never mind..carry on.
I just cannot believe the simple-mindedness of so many normies who cannot understand that there were two groups there that day.
There were a million patriotic, peaceful Trump supporters who wanted to show their numbers to support the Senators in their decisions to contest the stolen states. (We wanted the procedings to go on, uninterrupted.)
Then the other group had the agenda of stopping the procedings, to prevent states from being contested and debated.
The group with ear pieces, helmets, shorts, or black attire with gas masks were the latter group. They were not protesters, but were paid rioters and were violent and destructive.
Which group got their way? Not the protesters. We lost our chance for the two-hour debates per contested state. Which group benefitted from the riots?
Which group passed a bill to prevent that procedure from ever being allowed again?
So Clintonesque, attack the messenger in order to silence the obvious.
"Who ya gonna believe your own eyes or us?!"
Well done OP. Not at all surprising these unreliable news sources are in smear mode. Sadly, I can see exactly what might be going thru a normie's head.
Tucker said something?
Elon backed it up on Twitter?
Hmmm. maybe there's something to this.
Normie then proceeds to their browser bookmarked news source MSNBC, reads only the headline, and says "oh forget it. My MSNBC said its bogus. That what I thought. Let me see what funny clip is trending on tiktok right now."
How in the hell can you take NEW VIDEO EVIDENCE of an event and call it a bad thing? ..Oh wait...we're talking about the lying media here..never mind..carry on.
I'm actually impressed. The mockingbirds are upping their game. Shouldn't all their headlines be parroting?
u/#q2982
I just cannot believe the simple-mindedness of so many normies who cannot understand that there were two groups there that day.
There were a million patriotic, peaceful Trump supporters who wanted to show their numbers to support the Senators in their decisions to contest the stolen states. (We wanted the procedings to go on, uninterrupted.)
Then the other group had the agenda of stopping the procedings, to prevent states from being contested and debated.
The group with ear pieces, helmets, shorts, or black attire with gas masks were the latter group. They were not protesters, but were paid rioters and were violent and destructive.
Which group got their way? Not the protesters. We lost our chance for the two-hour debates per contested state. Which group benefitted from the riots?
Which group passed a bill to prevent that procedure from ever being allowed again?
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/4573 at first, it didn't pass.
So, then, they snuck it into the omnibus bill in Dec of 2022.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/congress-approves-new-election-certification-rules-in-response-to-jan-6