I don't trust it as far as I could throw Jerry Nadler

It's clearly shooped. They didn't need to greenscreen anything. They just had to try their hardest to cover what they needed to in order to push the narrative they wanted to push. We've all known it since that day. Normies are just learning it now. This just makes us look stupid. The rabbit hole doesn't need to go that deep for this one.

No sauce! No updoot!

Edit: The real picture.

https://patriots.win/p/16aTQXdeJZ/photoshoots-who-was-behind-the-c/c/

Edit 2: Video at 22 seconds.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6xwJbNdEJs

shaman boy looks photoshopped to me

I am suspicious of this low resolution photo becase of the discoloured outline separating the green screen and the foreground. There is a halo effect around the heads of some of the figures most noteably the bearded guy with the yellow hooded top. The whole point of a greenscreen should be to create sharp edges around people and objects to make combining foregrounds and backgrounds seamless. Question everything.

I was watching through a bunch of different livestreams on social media accounts. Doubt they could have greenscreened that

I question it and don’t want to run with it… nothing would surprise me though, and this would be powerful if it could be verified.. anyone remember seeing any J-6 footage or pics that would be the same without green screen ?

I hope Tucker has access to the metadata.

I don't get it..

Hm.

MOAB

Around 2020 they really started ramping up the hyperreal possibilities of deepfakery and greenscreening etc. Hence Channel 4 in the UK doing a deepfake Queens speech that Christmas. Trouble is it works both ways - to fool us that we're seeing something real, or conversely, to make us question if what we've seen for real could have been fake. Pretty smart cuntery.

Isn't horn guy dead?

I have video evidence of the Q shaman at the Washington monument at about 11am on January 6th..so he was definitely there that day

Whhaattt??