Tucker Carlson talks about waking up and his regrets after decades in mainstream media.
(files.catbox.moe)
💊 RED PILL 💊
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (130)
sorted by:
Beautiful. Any doubts I had about Tucker were put to rest here. Yes, let's remain skeptical, but he's the only talking head in MSM saying these words. This is the Great Awakening.
As one of his vocal detractors, I am listening real close. Sounds like a mea culpa. And I am more than 28. I remember watching Eisenhower's innaugeration.
Agreed. Actors are acting. TBH I'm millennial so I've never used traditional news sources, I didn't pay any attention to Tucker before this saga cause he was a twat on TV wearing a bow tie.
The first journalist I actually paid attention to was Breitbart.
My take is he never did anything bad enough that he was trapped, so he got the deal when deals were being made. This is an act in the play that will get more normies conditioned by the MSM to go away from it, because he just said it's okay to.
I'll end up maybe giving him a chance again, but not on Fox.
This
Or.. .there is an actual transformation underway, and humanity is waking up out of darkness and out of the history of being controlled and ruled by evil. Transformation is happening, people are waking up and realizing the world - their world - is not what they thought it was, and change - real change - begins.
I'm gonna go with that particular vision. Your one really doesn't seem to promise anything but darkness.
Be wary, but also cleanse your heart.
"When one doesn't care what the truth is"
Kek. um, no.
But I guess what you are attempting to say is that when doesn't have some egoic attachment to "being right", then one is free.
I never asserted that seeing the truth or being discerning = darkness. Quite the opposite.
You think you are right, and you think your perception is of "the truth". I disagree. I don't think you're seeing "truth" at all, hence, the darkness is an issue, particularly if you are creating or fermenting it.
Thanks, but no thanks.
So we wake up one person at a time. Right now he is helping opening up the awareness.
Couldn’t agree more, @3Beans!
What are your thoughts on all the shit talking he was doing on Trump in his communications with his bosses and colleagues?
“I hate him passionately.” 1/4/21, private text with someone talking about Trump
“We are very, very close to being able to ignore Trump most nights” and “I truly can’t wait.” also 1/4/21 in private text with a colleague speaking about Trump.
Well, wait and see on that. It's not a crime for him to have an opinion. It's what he (what anyone) does and how he (they) grows that matters.
If he's awake to the truth behind the media, and if he works to spread the truth, not the propaganda, then why shouldn't he be given the benefit of the doubt? Hold him to account for any crimes that he commits, certainly, but in this case, he didn't (doesn't) like Trump, and he was blind to the truth behind the media? So what?
When someone wakes up and shows that they're willing to help, and then does so, then the response shouldn't be "What took you so long? Care to explain this, this, and that?", it should be "Welcome aboard".
If we wanted everyone to be perfect, and refused to associate with anyone who had flaws, then we'd be alone for a very long time. This isn't a cult, and we're not all required to have the same beliefs. If Tucker is openly awake to the lies and the culture of the media, and is not ignoring it, then he deserves respect for that much, at the very least.
👆Absolutely This 👆
Ok
IMHO, as a journalist, what is important is bias. He doesn't have to like Trump. Does he show bias in his reporting? That is the question. Additionally, "hating" Trump -- how many normies/leftists that are sleeping will this resonate with?
Do you believe he is unbiased? And he's not so much a journalist as a political commentator.
How many normies/lefties will ever see that?
What is interesting is he is the only one reporting on this stuff. The lone voice, countering all the other MSM narratives. And it's interesting. I just wonder what changed his reporting, or who is encouraging/discouraging it. Why is his reporting different, why hasn't Fox cancelled him yet, etc. It is interesting to see TC and Trump interacting together. The fact that those emails came out gave him a lot of press the leftists probably saw, and maybe because of that they'll tune in. His ratings are thru the roof r/n, so I'm sure some dems/leftists are watching to see what he has to say.
He is not a journalist though. He actually defended himself in court by distinguishing his show as "entertainment", and claiming "no reasonable person" would conflate his opinions with actual facts. That was his defense. The Fox lawyers argued (persuasively) that his audience wants to hear him defend their (the audience's) opinions, but that they would never consider what he says on air to be factual. That's what differentiates these private communications with his colleagues: he really did mean what he said. He was telling the truth for once. Maybe it's time to believe him.
Excellent comment. 100% agree.