Femimazis prove they aren't feminist. Feminism means the freedom to choose what you want. Not to be told what they want you to do. That's everything wrong with woke in a summary.

I love that my wife is traditional. When we first got married I gave her a choice, either she can go to work like me and we can split the housework 50/50 and make a ton of money, or I can be the breadwinner while she stays home and does the housework, and raises the children. She chose the latter, and we're both happier for it. I'm glad at least some women are realizing that they've been fooled by feminism.

The Trad-Wife Trend will help unshackle women from their enslavement to the gynaeceum. Lets start by looking at what actually is happening with the lockstep obeyence to be working career women and supporting abortion. It's really all about controlling reproduction and.........That's right. It's population control. Let's look at the rise of transvestites (eunuchs) invading women sports and personal spaces like bathrooms.

Did you know historically that eunuchs were given charge of the caliphate's harem? Did you know the European version of the harem was called the 'gynaeceum'? It also charged eunuchs to head the gynaeceum.

What we are witnessing today is the same history occurring. Transgenders are eunuchs. These transvestites are being allowed to take control of women's activities. Twenty years ago I saw this development. There was instituted a vastly unseen and pervasive State-run harem or gynaeceum. It was too hidden and compartmentalized for Americans to grasp it taking hold. Many men who experienced divorce and discovered the vast majority of child custody is awarded to the mother, along with draconian court ordered child support orders, saw a glimpse of it. Unfortunately, the government institutionalized gynaeceum tended not to be recognized by the vast majority of them. Most of these men never saw what hit them.

With the well-financed "transgender" (eunuch) agenda moving into women's traditional spaces, consider how this all fits into the following feminist movement. Provided below is the public policy plans with their individual thresholds and development:

Stages for Creating the Gynaeceum

1. Tradition Family - This is the Christian traditional role where the Male is the head of the family and patriarch.

➡ Public policy: Males are then debased. Female is empowered. The Gynarchy is started.⬇

2. Single Parent Families - Traditional family is deconstructed. Male is replaced by the State as provider and becomes patriarch.

➡ Public policy: Mothers are then debased. Males are already controlled. Rise of the Gynarchy.⬇

3. State-run family - Female is replaced by the State as provider and Matriarch. Transgender eunuchs are used to completely dominate women and are their voice.

➡ Public policy: Mothers become assistants to the State. The Gynaeceum is fully institutionalized. The Gynarchy is universal.

For these callous changes to occur, raising children must be monitored and controlled from birth.[11], [12] To avoid backlash and the spark leading to rebellion, parents will be compelled to give allegiance to the regime. Otherwise, it will be considered a treasonous act. They will swear an oath that their children are the future defenders of the government and its public policy.

At first, parents will serve as the State's guardians and caretakers of their children. Parents will not know their children have been made wards of the government until it is too late. Courts already designate a maternal presumption in divorce.[13] The rising Gynarchy will serve to destroy the last vestiges of patriarchy and degrade the male to the role of essentially a sperm donor. Females will be empowered and designated as the guardians of their children with the assistance and welfare of the State. This authority is required until the government establishes the infrastructure to raise children from the time they are born. State mandated daycare centers will be established and compulsory education will be imposed. They will provide the necessary propaganda to prepare children for their occupational station and service to the government.[14]

In the future, mothers will be eliminated as parents, non jus personarum. Women will not be needed for child rearing. Essentially, they will be reduced to the role of surrogates for bearing children. The absent father, already deposed, is hopelessly under the jurisdiction of the Gynarchy. If he desires to see his offspring, he will have to go through the bureaucracy. When he does see them, it will be with strictly supervised visitation - for he is considered a threat to the State.

Single mothers will be blamed for the great social problems caused by their undisciplined children.[15] American society has already been greatly affected by a deluge of criminals and misfits.[16] Public reproach will serve to make women feel inept and fearful for their security. They will readily hand over their children to the government to protect their State-provided welfare. The Gynaeceum will be fulfilled at this time. Females will accept the State orphan solution and will be greatly deceived. In reality, a terrifying sin will be committed by selling their kindred's birthright into slavery. Few will ever figure it out and even fewer will openly resist this evil. Their new masters will pacify them.

The organic female instinctively desires to be close to her child; to cuddle and nourish it. She will be encouraged to assist the State by becoming a wet nurses to spend more time with her children. There are already nursing businesses for this purpose. The regime will provide women employers with incentives of enhanced maternity leave. Indeed, the State will make it fashionable and women will in turn embrace the welfare.

There at a central place, mothers will meet under the tutelage and supervision of the Gynarchy's Lesbian and eunuch transgender officials. As their toddlers suckle at their breasts, they will feel comforted to be with their children and among other females. To women it is perceived as a safe house; a haven for women to reflect; to talk about inward things, . . . and help others carry out their feminine duty to the superstate. The Gynaeceum has been institutionalized. It is seen in every population center. Each female has accepted her place in the new order as women have done throughout the history of conquered nations. Heuristically, they abhor violence. As long as the new peace is maintained (even if it is brutally oppressive) they will tend to the things that provide them comfort and security.

Males will not have a voice. The fatherless society will continue to be enforced. Men will be encouraged to invest their seed in sperm banks. With the decreasing sperm counts in European and American males,[17] men may want to preserve their seed in the hopes of continuing their progeny. The increasing "lesbian-ization" and misandry of women has already spurred a movement in this direction. A growing number of Lesbian couples have chosen to be artificially inseminated by sperm donors.[18] The government increasingly supports it.

Parental Licenses

The regime will issue parental licenses[19] as a measure to further control reproductive rights and population.[20] This has already been proposed.[21] During these times, every female will be reminded of her sex's total failure as single parents. The State will also assure men are known [to women] to be inherently violent, especially against women and children. As a consequence, females will accept parental licenses as a measure for the public good.

Psychologists, sociologists, and psychiatrists will be employed to assure each heterosexual relationship is beneficial to the new society[22] These government agents will scrutinize the most personal views of men and women alike. They will assure that each person thinks correctly and is not a threat to the regime. The Ministry will enforce compulsory foster care from birth. As a precondition to the license, parents will turn their infant over to a "State qualified" foster care center. The mother will be allowed to visit and nurse her newborn. The father will be greatly restricted.

"The creation of a new social value in the United States goes through a process of identifying and discussing an issue in organizations and the media. Persuading arguments in the form of editorials, essays and political policies shape the issue so that it assumes the specificity of a value. Then education promulgates the need for the value. Finally, legislation embeds the value in our society."[23]

The ruling class will control the nation's population, its reproduction, and the stock of its herd. It is the stated goal of the financial cabal and the United Nations to bring the world population down from the present 6.2 billion down to 500 million using warfare, famine and disease.

"The present vast overpopulation ... must be met in the present by the reduction in the numbers now existing. It must be done by whatever means necessary...."[24]

References

[11] The Family Support Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-485), Section 1615 of the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996 (H.R.3448, became PL104-188 8/20/96) Both laws require newborns and children to have Social Security Numbers.

[12] Don Harkins, "Midwives Pressed into Big Brother's Service," Idaho Observer, Sept. 2000. www.proliberty.com/observer/20000913.htm, https://web.archive.org/web/20210418084937/https://www.proliberty.com/observer/20000913.htm

[13] Timothy Horton, "Winning Your Divorce ­ A Man's Survival," p. 93. 1994

[14] DeAnna Putnam, "Bryants lose court battle: Social Service now guardian of Waltham children in home schooling case," http://www.dailynewstribune.com/news/local_regional/waltbryants12142001.htm, https://web.archive.org/web/20011227231202/http://www.dailynewstribune.com/news/local_regional/waltbryants12142001.htm

[15] See "Statistics" at Robert Muchnick's web site, Center for Children's Justice, http://www.childrensjustice.org/, https://web.archive.org/web/20030209053113/http://www.childrensjustice.org/

[16] Maggie Gallager, "Fatherless Boys Grow Up Into Dangerous Men," The Wall Street Journal, Dec. 1, 1998.

[17] Sperm count decreased from 113 million per ml in 1938 to 66 million per ml in 1990. A. Michael Warhurst "Introduction to Hormone Disrupting Chemicals," http://website.lineone.net/~mwarhurst/human.html, https://web.archive.org/web/20010407062911/http://website.lineone.net/~mwarhurst/human.html

[18] Laurie Essig, "Melissa, David and me," http://archive.salon.com/mwt/feature/2000/01/28/etheridge/print.html, https://web.archive.org/web/20030907020128/http://archive.salon.com/mwt/feature/2000/01/28/etheridge/print.html

[19] Hugh LaFollette, "Licensing Parents," Philosophy and Public Affairs. 1980. http://www.etsu.edu/philos/faculty/hugh/lic-par.htm, https://web.archive.org/web/20010221200852/http://www.etsu.edu/philos/faculty/hugh/lic-par.htm. There is a long list of academics that supports parental licenses.

[20] Widely practiced in China and India.

[21] Jack C. Westman, ""Licensing Parents: Can We Prevent Child Abuse and Neglect?"

[22] Tana Dineen, "Manufacturing Victims: What the Psychology Industry is Doing to People," Book review by Robert Sibley, "Psychology Making Nation of Victims," Apr. 11, 2001. www.amazon.com

[23] Ibid. "The Rationale and Feasibility of Licensing Parents," Society magazine, Nov./Dec., 1996, p. 47-48.

[24] United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) held in Des Moines, Iowa, September, 1991. From Karen Griffith's "Is Belief In A Planned One World Government "Far Fetched Paranoia"?"

Love it. I plan to be one starting right now...

I’m so thankful to be married to a man who supports my desire to be a homemaker. It’s been my hearts desire since I was a child and he has helped me fulfill it. I did work when we first married (almost 12 years ago) but it was because I chose to and I had a lot of time on my hands. I stopped working 7-8 years ago and we’re expecting our first child this September. We’re truly blessed (:

The power is going out. Feminism is going right along with it.

As much as Feminazis hate pre-born babies, this looks to me like the Spirit of God is raising a standard against the evil of feminazism.

However, the media is acting as if this is a contagion that needs to be suppressed and destroyed ASAP.

Of course because like with everything their bullshit systems can't thrive if there is dissent and alternatives.

It's frightened!

As a woman who was raised (it was DRILLED into my head) to be independent, it has been a very challenging mind shift going from entrepreneur to SAHM. However, I can feel in my soul that being a homemaker, homeschooling my babies and being the best wife I can be, is the right step for me. If anyone else is struggling with this transition, you are not alone. Even if this is truly what your soul longs for, un-doing the brainwashing and the desire to be viewed as an independent, successful woman is HARD. Hugs to everyone making the same steps!

But, but if women stay at home we can't tax them can we? No we can't Hymie, release the feminazis!!!

In the 70's, they had that stupid vitamin commercial. 🎶 Cause I'm a wooomaaan, w-o-m-a-n 🎶 As a tween and watching my Mom work her ass off raising 6 kids, I thought, "what a load of shit!" But so many bought into it. I'm glad to see the tide turning. Btw, I chose career over family while my sisters chose to stay-at-home.

On Sunday I will celebrate being "Trad" for 46 years. Not always easy but nothing worth having really comes easy. Would do it again.

Feminists: "Women should be allowed to chose what they want to do!"

Feminists: "Nooooooooooooooo, you can't want to stay at home with kids! Reeeeeeeeeeeeeee!"