That's a good point and I don't know if it's true. I just know that this is very typical of how Trump reveals things. He could have left the issue of a man out of the story altogether. Unless of course, he's getting ahead of his own story / accusation about a man that is coming out, lol.
I prefer to reserve any sort of judgment until I have enough information to convince me, or at least allow me to reasonably entertain the idea.
I myself haven't drawn that conclusion from DJT's actions. Rather, I see his public pronouncements as working on and forming (directing) the development of particular narratives.
Can you think of an example where DJT 'revealed' something this way? For 'typically', it would have to be a bunch of examples, but even one, I'm curious about.
The real strength of the collective mind is that many of us tend to see things (ie. DJT's actions) from differing perspectives that focus on different things. I have a certain concept of DJT in my own mind's eye, and sometimes its hard to grasp why or how others have the perspective they do.
Yes, there are a number of things he's casually mentioned, (in an almost off-hand type of way) that eventually led to something related to that very thing being revealed. I guess we'll have to wait to see if any such reveal comes about Ron and a man. It's not something that interests me very much, but I wouldn't be surprised if eventually, something like that comes out. (An accusation, not necessarily a fact.) And it would possibly be timed to do the most destruction in terms of his presidential run. Time will tell, I suppose.
Hmm .. what does Trump know about this 'possible man' he mentioned. There's something to that statement.
Ron DeSuctapenus?
That parenthetical struck me immediately. Trump doesnt say something like that unless its true.
Look at blurred face on the far left.
It does sound way specific.
He said "Fake accusations" and "false stories". What makes you think he's saying they are true?
That's a good point and I don't know if it's true. I just know that this is very typical of how Trump reveals things. He could have left the issue of a man out of the story altogether. Unless of course, he's getting ahead of his own story / accusation about a man that is coming out, lol.
I prefer to reserve any sort of judgment until I have enough information to convince me, or at least allow me to reasonably entertain the idea.
I myself haven't drawn that conclusion from DJT's actions. Rather, I see his public pronouncements as working on and forming (directing) the development of particular narratives.
Can you think of an example where DJT 'revealed' something this way? For 'typically', it would have to be a bunch of examples, but even one, I'm curious about.
The real strength of the collective mind is that many of us tend to see things (ie. DJT's actions) from differing perspectives that focus on different things. I have a certain concept of DJT in my own mind's eye, and sometimes its hard to grasp why or how others have the perspective they do.
Yes, there are a number of things he's casually mentioned, (in an almost off-hand type of way) that eventually led to something related to that very thing being revealed. I guess we'll have to wait to see if any such reveal comes about Ron and a man. It's not something that interests me very much, but I wouldn't be surprised if eventually, something like that comes out. (An accusation, not necessarily a fact.) And it would possibly be timed to do the most destruction in terms of his presidential run. Time will tell, I suppose.