◾️ The Russian Federation positively assesses the position of China on Ukraine, and China positively assesses the readiness of the Russian Federation to launch negotiations;
◾️ Russia and China are concerned about the risks associated with the creation of AUKUS and their plans to build nuclear submarines;
◾️ Russia and China call on AUKUS to strictly fulfill its obligations to non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction;
◾️ Russia and China are planning to strengthen a comprehensive partnership in the energy sector;
◾️ The Russian Federation and China believe that in order to resolve the Ukrainian crisis, it is necessary to prevent bloc confrontation and incitement of conflict;
◾️ The Russian Federation and China are concerned about the military-biological activities of the United States, they demand clarification on this matter;
◾️ Russia and China will expand scientific exchanges to ensure the technological leadership of the two countries;
◾️ The Russian Federation and China urge to avoid the degradation of the crisis in Ukraine and its transition "to an uncontrollable phase";
◾️ Russia and China oppose all unilateral sanctions imposed bypassing the UN Security Council;
◾️ Russia and China are pushing for the US to speed up the elimination of its stockpile of chemical weapons;
◾️ Russia and China will strengthen cooperation in agriculture to ensure food security;
◾️ The Russian Federation and China plan to promote mutual and global energy security;
Russia and China insist that NATO strictly observe the defensive nature of their organization and respect foreign sovereignty;
◾️ Russia and China oppose the formation of "closed exclusive bloc structures, bloc policies and opposing camps" in the Asia-Pacific region;
◾️ The Russian Federation and China will increase the scale and optimize the structure of trade, including through the development of electronic commerce;
◾️ Russia and China are going to increase the level of financial cooperation and strengthen cooperation in the financial markets;
◾️ The United States must take real action to address the legitimate concerns of the DPRK and create conditions for dialogue;
◾️ The Russian Federation and China are concerned about the intensification of US activities in the field of missile weapons and call for an end to undermining international security;
◾️ Russia and China are against attempts to use space for armed confrontation and will oppose such activity;
◾️ Russia and China will expand mutual access to agricultural products and strengthen investment cooperation in this area;
◾️ The Russian Federation and the PRC are aimed at cooperation in the field of mutually beneficial supply of basic goods and mineral resources;
◾️ The Russian Federation and China oppose the militarization of IT, they are for multilateral, equal and transparent global governance of the Internet.
http://www.en.kremlin.ru/supplement/5770
https://www.reuters.com/world/china/moscow-beijing-partnership-has-no-limits-2022-02-04/
https://www.daily-sun.com/post/680733/RussiaChina-issues-joint-statement
I've worked space weapons since 1980, and no one who knows better can take this with a straight face. The Soviets developed co-orbital anti-satellite weapons long ago. The Chinese have been demonstrating their satellite interceptors in recent years. Actions speak louder than words.
Name checks out
It's the age old tradition of saying you don't support something and doing it in secret. Accuse your enemies to deflect the fact that you are doing the exact thing you are accusing someone else of doing. Besides, all of their testing and weapon development was purely for scientific exploration. 😁
Or even when it is not done in secret. The history goes back to the 1960s, and includes Russia, the U.S., China, and india. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-satellite_weapon
Well, it was supposed to be a secret, not to each other, of course. They only keep secrets from us little people. The intel organizations pretty much know almost everything the other guys are doing.
The Soviet work in the 1980s was revealed in DoD reports on strategic defense that were published for public distribution. Our work with the air-launched ASAT was featured in Aviation Week & Space Technology while it was ongoing. The kinetic energy weapon warhead of the Standard 3 missile was presented as a cutaway model in an unclassified industry conference in the early 2000s (I was there to see it---it was a 2nd generation of technology first reduced to practice by the Boeing Company). So, while the technical details may be secret, the existence of programs is pretty much an open matter. You just need to have the right magazine subscriptions.