My favorite part about this Q post...
"How do you introduce evidence legally?"
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (11)
sorted by:
Interesting. I like the line "Sometimes allowing your enemies to [openly] attack.... The good guys have something up their sleeves and it just might turn into more than what the left is expecting. When Trump goes to his arraignment can he present some facts that are not germaine to this case?
Not really - his arraignment will be for them to discuss the terms of his release pending trial; the judge will essentially release him of his own recognizance without any issues of posing a bond and that will be it. The time to argue legal and factual issues will come later.
Yeah like the letter to the FEC in 2018 from Cohens lawyer that states Cohen paid Stormy Daniels himself without Trumps knowledge
Precedent!!!
In Law, 90% of all cases fall on precident. Preceding case law typically means the Constitutional aspect of such an entry or act has been fully researched and ruled upon. The DS has either stepped into it so to speak with everything from released tax information of a former President to now indicting one. Each instance has SET THE PRECIDENT. Either the DS is literally retarded or this has been been an OP to wake up the sleepers.
Either Way..... Giddy Up!!!
Carry On!!!
Any evidence allowed by the crooked court to be entered, would have to be relevant to the case. Stormy Danies being a whorse face and getting hush money.
Not a big picture kinda guy are you? Why are you here?
Actually it's really depressing that we have allowed losers like this into any part of our justice system.
This time for real.
LOL