Everything bad the left accuses the right of, they themselves do. They are implying that in America we don't jail political opponents simply for being political opponents. And if America worked the way it should, we would not. But it is the communist deep-state that does exactly that. On the other hand, just because someone is in politics doesn't mean they should be immune from imprisonment for actual crimes. Once again, the deep-state supporters think that their corrupt criminal politicians should get immunity from everything because they are in politics. That's not how things are supposed to work. In the end, the communists who shill for the deep state do what they do best: lie and mislead even when everyone knows they are lying and misleading. The truth offends them.
Wow. They just can't help showing how criminal and lawless they are. B R A V O. There is no excuse for any of this. I want these rabid creatures removed from any contact with decent people, one way or another.
No, Trump is saying he would jail those who are guilty. What did the AG of NY say he would do even before elected? Remember no one, Left or Right, is above the law if guilty, and evidence/crimes are not fabricated, twisted and charged to meet the narrative desired. If you are treasonous in acts, and found to be guilty, then you should receive the punishment.
Harsh! I'll put more effort into my critique of your statement:
It seems to imply that Trump is good because he didn't "follow through" on locking up his political opponents, while Biden is bad for having done so. As such it looks like it's applauding him for not putting Hilary in jail.
Ah, I totally understand your frustration. I got back on in November of last year, was suspended a couple of times since then, locked out a couple of times and now, though they say that there are no issues from their end, I cannot get back on. All I can do is read and follow links. Glad about that but it sucks; lots of good info on there, at least in my opinion.
I think it's perfectly fine to jail "political opponents" when they are convicted of treason for betraying their oath of office and the people they allegedly represent.
Not convicting these criminals pays homage to the unwritten agreement that they can all get crazy rich via corruption together as long as none of them throw the first indictment.
I'd argue it's the crime that makes the difference.
How is a minor detail in campaign finance law that DIDN'T even happen different from treason funded by tax dollars & genocide to boot?
We jail people for crimes. THAT is the Rule of Law. It should have nothing to do with whether they are an opponent or not.
I'll take, "Things that didn't age well" for $500, Alex.
Bring on the sealed indictments. Let's go. We have the receipts on all of these criminals. I hope someone somewhere grows some b___s soon.
Nice research. 👌
Everything bad the left accuses the right of, they themselves do. They are implying that in America we don't jail political opponents simply for being political opponents. And if America worked the way it should, we would not. But it is the communist deep-state that does exactly that. On the other hand, just because someone is in politics doesn't mean they should be immune from imprisonment for actual crimes. Once again, the deep-state supporters think that their corrupt criminal politicians should get immunity from everything because they are in politics. That's not how things are supposed to work. In the end, the communists who shill for the deep state do what they do best: lie and mislead even when everyone knows they are lying and misleading. The truth offends them.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECcqqPN1EXk
Justified or forgiven?
Sanctification, justification, glorification or maybe I have that out o order
Wow. They just can't help showing how criminal and lawless they are. B R A V O. There is no excuse for any of this. I want these rabid creatures removed from any contact with decent people, one way or another.
The typical leftie sheep thinks that hillary, being a leftist herself, cannot possibly be guilty of any crime whatever.
Therefore, DJT saying that she should be in jail can only be interpreted as "trying to jail your political opponents."
This is commie herdthink.
They’ll wish jail. This time it’s different.
Anyone else notice how many rhetorical questions were asked by the MSM about "How Trump was feeling"
I'm confident that showing proof that the commies are hypocrites is going to shame them into submission.
Hypocrite thy name is Democrat.
The whole thing getting a bit out of hand, eh?
(Who's hand exactly? Ours?)
No, Trump is saying he would jail those who are guilty. What did the AG of NY say he would do even before elected? Remember no one, Left or Right, is above the law if guilty, and evidence/crimes are not fabricated, twisted and charged to meet the narrative desired. If you are treasonous in acts, and found to be guilty, then you should receive the punishment.
So you weren't disappointed that he didn't follow through?
Harsh! I'll put more effort into my critique of your statement:
It seems to imply that Trump is good because he didn't "follow through" on locking up his political opponents, while Biden is bad for having done so. As such it looks like it's applauding him for not putting Hilary in jail.
Good talk
Twitter is where many of the receipts are. Where have you been?
Ah, I totally understand your frustration. I got back on in November of last year, was suspended a couple of times since then, locked out a couple of times and now, though they say that there are no issues from their end, I cannot get back on. All I can do is read and follow links. Glad about that but it sucks; lots of good info on there, at least in my opinion.
I think it's perfectly fine to jail "political opponents" when they are convicted of treason for betraying their oath of office and the people they allegedly represent.
Not convicting these criminals pays homage to the unwritten agreement that they can all get crazy rich via corruption together as long as none of them throw the first indictment.