"One can only defend democracy by totalitarian methods"
RESTRICT ACT up next
By KATHLEEN MCCOOK APR 14, 2023
Airman Jack Teixeira has been arrested for leaking confidential intelligence and defense documents on a gaming chat server.1
The cacophony of news reports seems to be focused on Teixeira rather than the content of the items leaked. Immediately I read and heard that what was leaked may have been muddled and releaked and changed. This deflects the public’s attention.
Ironically George Orwell commented back when England was pro-Russian.2
One of the peculiar phenomena of our time is the renegade Liberal. Over and above the familiar Marxist claim that ‘bourgeois liberty’ is an illusion, there is now a widespread tendency to argue that one can only defend democracy by totalitarian methods. If one loves democracy, the argument runs, one must crush its enemies by no matter what means. And who are its enemies? It always appears that they are not only those who attack it openly and consciously, but those who ‘objectively’ endanger it by spreading mistaken doctrines. In other words, defending democracy involves destroying all independence of thought.
RESTRICT ACT Keep an eye on the RESTRICT Act wending its way through Congress. (RESTRICT is a lovely little acronym for Restricting the Emergence of Security Threats that Risk Information and Communications Technology Act of 2023). It’s not just all about Tik-Tok.3
1 Jack Teixeira: US airman appears in court over Pentagon documents leak. BBC News. 4/14/2023.
2 George Orwell, The Freedom of the Press (Orwell's Proposed Preface to ‘Animal Farm’)
3 Joseph Cox, (March 29, 2023). “The 'Insanely Broad' RESTRICT Act Could Ban Much More Than Just TikTok.” Motherboard.
https://kathleenmccook.substack.com/p/one-can-only-defend-democracy-by
Since we don't have a democracy this attempt is futile. This whole leak crap is a carefully packaged and delivered op. Basically the same as a FF with media assistance. Did no one question how the media was on hand to film the arrest of the perp Jack? Does anyone believe that if this was a real event the arrest would have been done quietly to no alert any other perps involved?
https://files.catbox.moe/ko5k5f.mp4
We have a Republic, which is a Representative Democracy.
We have a Constitutional Republic. A democracy, representative or otherwise, is simply mob rule. The Founders feared any form of democracy. They knew that a democracy destroys the rights of portions of the citizenry that for whatever reason have fewer numbers. It's also why they gave us the Electoral College. Per Ben Franklin, a democracy is 2 wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner.
Democracy is the act of voting.
We vote for our representatives who then vote on our behalf.
That's called democracy.
The electoral college is representative in nature, a failsafe to ensure that less populated / smaller states have a somewhat proportionate vote.
We are a Constitutional Republic..which means we are a Republic, which is representational democracy, protected by an inalienable (in theory, demonstrably not in practice) Constitution.
That in itself can be voted away or amended by unanimous representative voting.
Trying this hard to disregard the left's idea of democracy to the point that you reject reality is extremely unbecoming.
We are a Republic. A representative form of democracy. We are backed by a Constitution, to aid in further preventing mob rule.
The left advocates for direct democracy, regardless of the Constitution's existence.
We are different, and for the sake of being correct and accurate, we ensure it is known that we are a Constitutional Republic.
But it is a form of democracy.
Both a Republic as we practice it, and a Democracy as it has been practiced commit the same fraud. The fraud of false claims on Jurisdiction.
Every Ruler, whether it be a Dictator, President, King, the Mob, or "an educated proletariat" (in the ideal Socialist, Democratic, OR Republic case) has, in all of our actual experiences, claimed the Right to dictate what the individual can do in their domain.
Each Individual has a Jurisdiction, a domain over which they are the Ultimate Authority. That Jurisdiction is themselves (by Natural Law), and in any reasonable society, their property. Each Ruler, no matter their type, in all of our experiences, has laid claim to the Right to tell people what they can or can't do within their Jurisdiction. The design of all of these system gives them power over Our Jurisdiction, including "the Republic" we have. This fraudulent claim on Our Jurisdiction was in there from the very beginning.
This is the key to understanding the fraud that has been perpetrated on our world, which gives an appreciation for how far back this goes. Every system makes this same claim. Every system also justifies this claim as being for someone's "good." In a democracy, or socialism, or communism (really all just variants of the same "ism"), and indeed, even in our Republic, the "someone" for whom we are forced to give up our Jurisdiction is "the greater." We do it all for "the greater good." It's different in a "Kingdom," but sometimes even Kings claim that they are stealing from the masses (taking their property from them in "taxes") and enslaving them in serfdom really just for their "own good."
It's all the same fraud with a different wrapping. Once we understand that any claim on Our Jurisdiction is fraudulent we will have the base framework from which to create a system that doesn't commit this fraud. This is what needs to be learned in the GA, more than anything else, this is the key to "our democracy," however you want to set it up. Any system that can't make claims on your Right to live your life, or handle your property is fine with me. Call it a Republic, call it a Democracy, call it Your Mom. Nothing else really matters but a built in respect for every Individuals Sovereignty over their Jurisdiction of Life, Liberty, and Property.
Thank you! That's a wonderful explanation. 👏👏
You are mixing up voting with democracy.
NPR agrees with you: https://www.npr.org/2022/09/10/1122089076/is-america-a-democracy-or-a-republic-yes-it-is
The Heritage Foundation doesn't: https://www.heritage.org/american-founders/report/america-republic-not-democracy
I don't know why I even bother with this anymore. It's like beating my head into a brick wall.
Go look up "representative democracy" and then tell me how that doesn't apply to us.
Here, this is to help immigrants to learn about the US to become citizens. I've found that it also helps people born a US citizen to understand their own government. You know, the stuff we all were supposed to learn in middle school. But I suppose many people slept through their Civics classes.
https://www.uscis.gov/citizenship/civic-assimilation/resources-for-new-lawful-permanent-residents/about-the-united-states
On that website I linked, you can type in "representative democracy" and it will bring up many links that help explain what a representative democracy is, and how the US is one.
“… The United States is a representative democracy and its people play an important role in the governing process...”.
This was maybe the ideal but it hasn’t been this way for a very long time!