Does it though? I've lost count how many times someone has posted something incorrect or completely misleading with hundreds of upvotes and often it's even been stickied. A handful of us will call out that the info is incorrect but many commenters clearly don't see our comments because positive comments and upvotes continue to roll in on those posts.
Actual ratioed posts are incredibly rare.
Even so, let's say bad/fake/misleading posts were getting called out and ratioed.
The inability of one person to do their job properly (the OP) has caused dozens (or far more) of people to spend time verifying and then debunking a bad post.
Far, far better that people take the OP's advice here to heart.
People here have the wrong belief that anything thats stickied means its true.
We are a research board, and stickying is how we get things in front of Anon eyes. Most information we process are not cut and dry and has multiple layers of obfuscation that needs to be pierced to know whats true and whats not.
Hence if a post is stickied, there is higher chance of more Anons analysing it and digging up the truth.
Important point is not to share GAW links without looking into it and understanding it properly and being able to defend it independant of GAW.
Great thing about this community is that even if someone posts fake shit, it gets called out and ratioed in no time. Thats the power of Anons.
That is one of the best things about this site👌
We're quite comfortable in disagreement.
I see a post with no dissenting comments as a red flag.
Does it though? I've lost count how many times someone has posted something incorrect or completely misleading with hundreds of upvotes and often it's even been stickied. A handful of us will call out that the info is incorrect but many commenters clearly don't see our comments because positive comments and upvotes continue to roll in on those posts.
Actual ratioed posts are incredibly rare.
Even so, let's say bad/fake/misleading posts were getting called out and ratioed. The inability of one person to do their job properly (the OP) has caused dozens (or far more) of people to spend time verifying and then debunking a bad post.
Far, far better that people take the OP's advice here to heart.
Very good points. Also would like to point out that those who call posts out as incorrect/fake frequently get called shills for doing so.
The worst is when you get called a paid shill, just because you went one logic too far in the narrative creation and solidification continuum.
🤣🤣
People here have the wrong belief that anything thats stickied means its true.
We are a research board, and stickying is how we get things in front of Anon eyes. Most information we process are not cut and dry and has multiple layers of obfuscation that needs to be pierced to know whats true and whats not.
Hence if a post is stickied, there is higher chance of more Anons analysing it and digging up the truth.
Important point is not to share GAW links without looking into it and understanding it properly and being able to defend it independant of GAW.
Yes I've heard this many times. It doesn't make it right nor does it make it excusable.
In other words you don't understand what this place is. Cool.