175
If misgendering someone is is literally violence, is it also violence to call someone a nazi, fascist or bigot, if they don’t identify with those labels?
posted ago by VaccinesCauseSIDS ago by VaccinesCauseSIDS +175 / -0

the people who claim that its literally “violence” to call a man a man, even if he is a man…

are the same people who have no problems calling you a nazi, or fascist, or bigot, even if you don’t identify as such.

Its like they feel they have a monopoly on language, definitions, and labels, and can change definitions, or apply labels to whoever they want, for whatever reason they want.

So if you refer to a person with a penis as a male, you are committing an act of violence, because they don’t identify as a male,

and because you are committing an act of violence, that is used as an excuse to use violence against you.

And then they call you a nazi, bigot, fascist, etc, even though you don’t identify as such, and somehow their words are NOT violence, and NOT an acceptable reason to retaliate with your own violence?

You: correctly identify a male as a male, are labeled as a nazi, and subject to become the victim of violence.

Them: incorrectly label you as a nazi, and then use the “fact” that you are a nazi, to justify violence against you.

When someone calls you a nazi, fascist, or bigot, they are using dehumanizing language, which is a BIG RED FLAG for impending violence.

When you call a male a male, you are merely stating an irrefutable fact. And for that, you deserve to get punched

26 comments
26 comments share save hide report block hide replies