Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

133
RALAND BRUNSON-SUING SUPREME COURT JUDGES PERJURING OATHS OF OFFICE- 4/22/23 KATHLEEN DUDLEY INTERVIEW (www.bitchute.com)
posted 3 years ago by Tellstruth 3 years ago by Tellstruth +133 / -0
19 comments share
19 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (19)
sorted by:
▲ 6 ▼
– barbie555 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Can you really sue a supreme court judge?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– PrincipledPsychopath 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

You can sue a justice for the same things you would sue anyone else for - e.g. if their dog runs wild and bites you - but you cannot sue them for actions related to their performance of their duties as justices. Search for "judicial immunity" for more info.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– lash 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Sooo dead on arrival then ..

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– PrincipledPsychopath 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Yep. The Brunsons need a competent lawyer to help explain how the law actually works, because none of these cases have an actually plausible legal theory as their basis.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– GGRockz 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

At least they are trying. You are just here bitching.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– PrincipledPsychopath 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

You have no idea who I am or what I'm doing.

"Trying" without any practical sense of how to turn effort into actual success is worse than useless. "We had to do something" is the classic justification when an idiotic plan makes things worse instead of better.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Trumpsara19 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Sometime God want us to try everything wrong and learn from it, the final one is the fruitful one.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– GGRockz 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Amen.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– GimmeMemes 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

Yes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Tellstruth [S] 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Raland Brunson and his brothers, are taking action. They saw the breach of Congress' fiduciary duties to investigate the concerns of over 100 Congressional complaints over the 2020 federal election. It is the responsibility, under the national Constitution, to investigate any chance of fraud in the election. But on January 6, 2021, 2/3 of Congress voted to ignore this mandatory investigation process. The Brunsons saw this as the last straw in our country for free and open elections. They took action and sued Congress, taking this lawsuit to the Supreme Court, which was not accepted to be heard by the Supreme Court. Resulting from this, Raland Brunson with his brothers, have sued three Supreme Court Judges for perjuring their oath office. Had they upheld their oath, to investigate the mandate by the Constitution, an investigation would be underway. The Brunson have taken on a committment to hold Congress and the Supreme Court justices to their sworn oaths....now WE the PEOPLE have our work to help by supporting them. Go to: enoughisenough.me AND pay $2 postage for your letter to the Federal Utah Judge who is hearing their case. We must put pressure upon this judge to let him know that we are watching. That he has the duty to uphold his oath of office.........

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Bostonstronk 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

What is the point of suing the supreme court. Who will hear that case

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Tellstruth [S] 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Suing MEMBERS of the supreme court.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– heebiejeebie 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Night Court!!!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– PrincipledPsychopath 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

None, and nobody.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– MrBig4575 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Plan E... long shot but would be effective and devastating to the establishment

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Heldiggrisen 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Are they still asking for the judges to unseat members of congress, POTUS, VP and SCOTUS?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– lash 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Yes.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Heldiggrisen 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

So they’re still asking for a non constitutional remedy?

Then this case is also moot, as it should be.

If it’s up to the courts to unseat elected members, then DJT will never last long as 47.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– RaymondBPanelli 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Am I missing something. Because this Brunson thing is looking more comical by the day.

permalink save report block reply

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 7 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - 8wn6p (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy