Planes did hit the building, please understand that with every operation there is an operation happening to muddy the waters. Planes hit those buildings, they were also rigged with explosives and the steal beams were cut with thermite. You have fallen for the disinformation campaign set out to muddy the water and discredit those asking the real questions. Why was NORAD told to stand down, why was a simulation happening at the exact same time with the exact same event, why did building 7 fall. How does 3 skyscrapers fall into their own footprins something which only a handful of demolition companies can do. Why was all the wreckage destroyed and the scene scrubbed. How did the engines melt away but the passports remained undamaged. How did untrained pilotes do such maneuvers, etc.
Wrong. You use video to say no planes hit, while video shows planes hitting. Here is your biggest flaw. Thousands of people saw pla es hit with their own eyes. People called from pla es trying to warn theor families or did you forget. I know people living in New York who watch as the 2nd tower was hit. You can deny all you want but eye witnesses matter. And if 1000 people said they watch the plane hit, and 4 people on YouTube said there was no plane, and I have family who saw the planes who do you think I will believe? There is truth in all the best lies. The towers were hit by planes. The planes did not take down the towers. The CIA did.
What you say is plausible.I know no eye witnesses but I wasn’t there either. I only watched it live on tv. So I could be wrong. I agree that planes weren’t the cause of the buildings coming down even if they were really hit. Bet you don’t know anyone who saw the Pentagon being hit by a plane though. Of course that strike would’ve taken a lot more skill with an aircraft big enough to make that hole.
I actually don't know if a plane hit the Pentagon at all since there is no video of a plan hitting it, no eye witnesses, and no wreckage and the first reporter on the scene said there was no plane wreckage. So that really could have been a missle or just explosives.
I have a question -- why even bother with the planes when the explosives were all that was needed for their desired outcome? If it was all done to have an excuse to go to war the explodes were enough. Why involve airplanes?
Because it would require a much more thorough investigation, how were they blown up, what kind of explosives, how did they get in there undetected, when was nanite placed, etc. They wanted a spectacle. Something obvious and something noone would deny. The planes caused the towers to collapse. No thorough investigation needed.
This was included in Scotty Mar too using that as a crossover.. is there a sauced theory on the Blurred Residential seals anytime Crooked Joe is on video?
Owen Shroyer and Darrin McBreen break down how Tucker Carlson learned about World Trade Center 7 collapsing on 9/11/2001 while visiting the Infowars studio.
Ha ha ha.
No planes hit any buildings on 911.
Let's see what happens. Come at me, AI bots!
Also, the vaccine risks far outweigh any benefits.
And guess what - Michelle Obama is a MAN.
Planes did hit the building, please understand that with every operation there is an operation happening to muddy the waters. Planes hit those buildings, they were also rigged with explosives and the steal beams were cut with thermite. You have fallen for the disinformation campaign set out to muddy the water and discredit those asking the real questions. Why was NORAD told to stand down, why was a simulation happening at the exact same time with the exact same event, why did building 7 fall. How does 3 skyscrapers fall into their own footprins something which only a handful of demolition companies can do. Why was all the wreckage destroyed and the scene scrubbed. How did the engines melt away but the passports remained undamaged. How did untrained pilotes do such maneuvers, etc.
No planes hit any buildings on 911.
All the news networks were compliant and assisted.
How do you like them apples, deep state?
FU.
Emotional response shows that you aren't being rational
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2ynY9D0sfusP/
No planes hit the towers or the pentagon for that matter.
Wrong. You use video to say no planes hit, while video shows planes hitting. Here is your biggest flaw. Thousands of people saw pla es hit with their own eyes. People called from pla es trying to warn theor families or did you forget. I know people living in New York who watch as the 2nd tower was hit. You can deny all you want but eye witnesses matter. And if 1000 people said they watch the plane hit, and 4 people on YouTube said there was no plane, and I have family who saw the planes who do you think I will believe? There is truth in all the best lies. The towers were hit by planes. The planes did not take down the towers. The CIA did.
What you say is plausible.I know no eye witnesses but I wasn’t there either. I only watched it live on tv. So I could be wrong. I agree that planes weren’t the cause of the buildings coming down even if they were really hit. Bet you don’t know anyone who saw the Pentagon being hit by a plane though. Of course that strike would’ve taken a lot more skill with an aircraft big enough to make that hole.
I actually don't know if a plane hit the Pentagon at all since there is no video of a plan hitting it, no eye witnesses, and no wreckage and the first reporter on the scene said there was no plane wreckage. So that really could have been a missle or just explosives.
I have a question -- why even bother with the planes when the explosives were all that was needed for their desired outcome? If it was all done to have an excuse to go to war the explodes were enough. Why involve airplanes?
Because it would require a much more thorough investigation, how were they blown up, what kind of explosives, how did they get in there undetected, when was nanite placed, etc. They wanted a spectacle. Something obvious and something noone would deny. The planes caused the towers to collapse. No thorough investigation needed.
To violate your freedom of movement under the guise of protection from the Tusken Raiders
Michelle Obama is a MAN.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6Pk4OeHm35vE/
It would be amazing to me if I were wrong. I'm pretty sure that Mike is a MAN.
"Michael and I..." - Ohbumner when speaking of his "wife".
https://communities.win/c/TheDonald/p/16b5zXBQSn/x/c/4TtqMR3oYj2?d=50
Excrutiating watching the world catch up in slomo.
This was included in Scotty Mar too using that as a crossover.. is there a sauced theory on the Blurred Residential seals anytime Crooked Joe is on video?
TUCKER CARLSON LEARNED ABOUT BUILDING 7 AT INFOWARS
https://www.bitchute.com/video/WqhvYUgNaCzD/
Owen Shroyer and Darrin McBreen break down how Tucker Carlson learned about World Trade Center 7 collapsing on 9/11/2001 while visiting the Infowars studio.
And then we have THIS habben; https://greatawakening.win/p/16b5zXAsAI/abc-airs-nyc-footage-with-twin-t/c/
not to mention the revelation of CIA involvement a couple days ago! I am seeing a target issue developing...
This doesnt' surprise me one bit. It explains why the news for 22 years kept lying every single year on the anniversary date.