54
Decoding the attack on Buckingham Palace yesterday. 🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
posted ago by propertyofUniverse ago by propertyofUniverse +54 / -0

Hi Guys

Here's a story I posted earlier:

https://greatawakening.win/p/16b5zct3UT/man-arrested-outside-buckingham-/c/

and another source:

https://www.newser.com/story/334754/man-throwing-shotgun-shells-arrested-at-buckingham-palace.html

It's widely accepted here at GAW that some events in the news are either setup, staged or even made up altogether just as a means of getting information from one party to another ie. Comms.

There are code words and concepts in comms such as water being information for example.

Here is an attempt to treat the news of the attack on Buckingham palace as a comms piece, no matter what actually occured in real life:

The guy threw shotgun shells, not bullets, per se. The police later did a controlled explosion of the man's bag as a precaution.

Explosion = "bomb" + shotgun "shells" = bombshell / bombshells.

Bombshells signify very significant scandal material, something which would bring a person down from their position.

The man had a suspicious bag that they blew up = someone did a controlled detonation on the bag to prevent the proverbial cat from getting out of the bag?

Could this be about controlling the release of bombshell information?

It happened on Tuesday. Tue (French) = "kill" Tuer (v.) = To kill

Could this be instructions to the press to kill the story.

Does someone have some bombshell allegations regarding King Charles??

"...and police are treating the matter "an isolated mental health incident" instead of terrorism."

Mental health incident = MK-Ultra victim going rogue?

Does this mean that someone has broken their programming and may go public?

Please add your thoughts.

19 comments
19 comments share save hide report block hide replies