Maybe, but if there's one thing that's clear in software, it's that every company seems to use different standards for what a version number is and means.
Only if they are doing it wrong. Particularly if they fail to indicate breaking changes with a first-number increment - this happened on a JS library we were using and it was completely and absolutely infuriating once we realized what was going on.
You are correct about the hotfix perhaps if it's not comms he simply used the latest version even though it was 11.4.0 that was the improvement he saw.
I’m a little puzzled at how an X.X.1 version would be a major improvement. That would normally be a bug-fixed version. Sounds more like comms to me.
Could be. Just to be clear I'm supplying the context, not dismissing potential secondary messages.
Musk states that version 12 is reserved for full self driving.
Some of the silliest discussions I have as a software engineer are related to what version # things should be...
KEK! Our Eng VP never wanted a new product released as 1.0. We always skipped 1 and went right to 2.0.
This is the way
Maybe, but if there's one thing that's clear in software, it's that every company seems to use different standards for what a version number is and means.
Only if they are doing it wrong. Particularly if they fail to indicate breaking changes with a first-number increment - this happened on a JS library we were using and it was completely and absolutely infuriating once we realized what was going on.
https://semver.org/
You are correct about the hotfix perhaps if it's not comms he simply used the latest version even though it was 11.4.0 that was the improvement he saw.
Edit: praying71 gives much needed context here: https://greatawakening.win/p/16b68tPAUZ/x/c/4TtqyqbV5Pw
Makes sense. Even more so, technically x.x.1 to x.x.2 would be bug fixes. Middle number new features, non-breaking.
There's always one, isn't there? LOL
Edit: I see there's already a couple more in this case. Geek on, frens