https://donaldjeffries.substack.com/p/qanon-trumpenstein-and-the-art-of
Jeffries talks about things we've all thought about and must explain in one fashion or another (and some things that are clearly not true). He takes the extreme Black Pill view, which I'm certainly not endorsing, but ignoring explanations we don't like of real events is exactly how we got into this mess in the first place. It's how the jabs were successfully introduced and deployed. It's how corrupt Presidents and other corrupt politicians came to run America and every other nation since before the time of Rome.
Take a deep breath and read on for an excerpt:
Trump’s Inaugural Address was the finest, in my view, since John F. Kennedy’s. Among those in the crowd, watching the address with a bird’s eye-seat, was Dr. Andrew Wakefield. Wakefield was perhaps the first doctor to focus public attention on the obvious links between vaccines and autism. And when Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. told the press that he’d just met with President-elect Trump, who was going to appoint him chair of a commission investigating such links, I thought that maybe, just maybe, Trump really was a disgruntled One Percenter, who had made his money and now wanted to expose the corrupt system that he had profited from.
But Trump’s White House quickly turned its back on RFK, Jr., and eventually stopped answering his calls. Needless to say, such a commission was never created. Trump’s appointments were about as bad as they could possibly be. One Never Trumper after another, like Nikki Haley, and later ultimate warmonger and bully John Bolton. I said at the time that I would like to know how many in his cabinet had actually voted for him. And then he appointed lifelong Bush crime family crony William Barr as his Attorney General. We are supposed to believe that he sincerely thought this defender of Waco, and character witness for the FBI sharpshooter that murdered Randy Weaver’s wife at Ruby Ridge, was going to “drain the swamp.”
Trump had promised perhaps more than any other presidential candidate in history. He was going to sign Executive Orders, on his “first day in office,” to ban birth-right citizenship, to ban sanctuary cities, to stop the foreign visa worker pipeline. He was going to close the border. He was going to actually deport those here illegally. On the immigration issue alone, Trump was full of promises. He kept none of these. Not one. He actually deported fewer illegals than open-borders Barack Obama. He didn’t touch birth-right citizenship or sanctuary cities. He didn’t immediately end Obama’s unconstitutional DACA agenda, and wound up saying he wanted to make DACA work. And Mexico laughed at his vow to make them pay for his “big beautiful wall.”
Needless to say, Trump didn’t keep his promises on other issues, either. He didn’t bring the troops who are still nonsensically stationed in 150 or whatever countries around the world, home. He bombed Syria when his own Never Trumper advisers pressured him to. He assassinated a supposed Iranian “terrorist” and bragged about it, just like his arch enemies Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton had previously boasted about their own murders. He backed down on releasing the JFK files when the CIA ordered him to. There was no infrastructure program. Trump said the same things about our sorry infrastructure that I’d been saying for years, but again he did nothing.
That was the story of the Trump administration. Four years of nothing. Except tweets.
Obama counted releasing illegals on the streets as "deportations," so he's wrong on that point.
But everyone here has questioned Trump's appointments (which is especially easy to do after the fact.) Among them, he got three SCOTUS justices and at least two went soft... although they're certainly better than having more wise latinas or non-biologists on the court.
It's honestly good to have this perspective in mind, because we can't fall into the trap of thinking everything he's doing is for the best (keeping Kushner around was a disaster, obviously,) which is one of the reasons I'm constantly doubting The Plan.
Didn’t Kushner negotiate peace in the Middle East?
There was a time when people thought that was a fantasy. Then Trump and Kushner get it done and everyone goes, “Pfft. Whatever. I coulda done that too.”
It went from a wild fantasy of impossibility to a common place achievement, just like the defeat of ISIS, ending Roe v. Wade, and a U.S. President walking into North Korea unarmed and introducing a handshake between the North and the South.
Reading the excerpt - that's some serious cherry picking of Trump's perceived failures and we're only half way through the game.
We know that there is a giant sting operation in place, that the inauguration was invalid, the administration is fake and some kind of white hat arrangement is in place.
Since we can see we are in the middle of a sting operation to catch the cabal in the act of their biggest take over - the great reset, things are in rather a transitory state and not how they really appear.
Why judge a thriller by a scene in the middle of the film?
I must admit, I really don't know why Trump seemed to have Soleimani assassinated. It didn't seem to make sense to me. I want to know what happened but that will take time.
Yeah this guy is worse than many MSN/CNN/CNBC writers.
This is all I need to know how bluepilled Jeffries is. He bombed the Cabal agents and real terrorists while the Cabal wanted to destroy Assad and his troops. He bombed areas to allow Russian troops to move in and do the dirty job.
Handling Syrian war was one of the masterful strokes by Trump, even while being surrounded by RINOs and Warmmongers.
In simple terms? Before 2017 the whole world was inundated by ISIS beheadings, terrorists commiting bloody atrocities, fear about people in UK etc smuggling themselves into Syria to join terrorists etc etc.
Today? ISIS is such a faint memory that many people take a while to remember what it was.
IMHO, this is not "opposing views". This is at the same level as an MSN article.
The way Trump ended the war in Syria with that 57 missile strike was brilliant. One thing about articles and writers like this, is they get so eager to “make their point” that they start distorting history to boost their argument, thinking not many people were paying attention, and even fewer have a clear memory of the recent past. Back at this time, every single TV channel, every newspaper, every expert, every politician, every influencer on social media - they were all calling for war in Syria. This is because the corporate media was running photos and video of dead babies on a loop. This put people into a state of extreme trauma and a mass hysteria was starting to form. It was similar to what happened with Ukraine, but in ways worse. There was a bloodlust that people got jacked into and started to crave. The world was losing its rationality and nobody except a few people on the “extreme right” were even questioning what the corporations were selling. But too many people were under the spell at that time and there was no way people were going to accept peace with Syria. They needed blood to be shed because they knew that only bloodshed would end the images of dead babies on TV that were putting them into trauma. Nobody knew how Trump was going to get out of it. All signs pointed to another forever war in the Middle East. Then all of a sudden Trump shot 57 missiles into an airplane hangar and it snapped everyone awake and cooled their need for bloodshed long enough that something shifted in the collective unconscious. Corporate media was also forced to switch from dead babies to bitching about Trump’s missile strike and once the dead babies stopped, people were able to climb out of their trauma.
Energy independence, anyone? A massive number of federal judges appointed?
I won't bother. If you enumerate only the disappointments, you will be...disappointed.
Too much whining. Everything is about timing. But I don't remember him making those promises for the first day in office EOs. He did come out against them, but I don't think he specified the timing if I remember correctly. What I have seen of the 80% non-public has been amazing. There is so much that has happened that the democrats have not reacted to at all; it makes me think the patriots are really in control. Not everywhere yet as seen by the law-fare going on. Which is really meant to give cover for their election fraud. Like the soccer mom narrative, etc. But the cases are so bizarre, I wonder if patriots are controlling that too.