Did President Trump ever acknowledge that he said "grab them by the 🐈" ? It was presented ONLY as an audio recording from inside a bus.
There are several comedians and software sound boards that impersonate his voice. I'm wondering if that's just another "false flag" the left tried to use as a "gotcha" moment that will be exposed as election interference in the future.
I'm always amazed at the ability of the left to ignore clear evidence as no evidence (like election fraud, vaccine, Hunter's laptop, BLM riots, etc) and turn no evidence into clear evidence (anything Trump related, Rittenhouse trial, etc).
That is a weird comparison. The one has TONS of evidence while the latter has none.....Its already been proven and adjudicated by courts that there is definitive proof that links the massive increase in childhood vaccines and the huge rise in autism over the last 40 years. The proper way to do this statement would have been to compare the BS rape insinuation to something else that has very little, but probable truth. The end result is that even that pathetic example had more evidence than this stupid bitch and her politically motivated rape charge.
One would assume with a username like that, you would have at least a few sources handy. The fact you don’t says a lot. I think it’s plausible but haven’t seen this proof you speak of
You don’t need evidence to prove a negative. In this case the negative is assumed true until you show any evidence to the contrary. And of course when I’m looking into a topic I don’t bother saving links for things that go along with the current narrative. What would be the point?
It’s funny how people get hostile for simply being asked for a source for their claim. One would think you would want people to ask so you could show them the evidence. But after seeing your evidence I get it.
If anything, the ~3% increase in autism as your link shows is an argument for more studies but it doesn’t prove vaccines cause autism.
When someone says “vaccines cause autism” most people don’t think of a 3% raise, they think of a significant raise. If you framed it as “vaccines slightly raise the likelihood of autism” you might find more people willing to listen.
She wasn't raped, she was abused. They needed Trumps well publicized 2016 "grabbing" comments to make this charge fly.
Did President Trump ever acknowledge that he said "grab them by the 🐈" ? It was presented ONLY as an audio recording from inside a bus.
There are several comedians and software sound boards that impersonate his voice. I'm wondering if that's just another "false flag" the left tried to use as a "gotcha" moment that will be exposed as election interference in the future.
Pretty sure he actually said it. One of his "friends" in the Bush family was wearing a wire
I'm always amazed at the ability of the left to ignore clear evidence as no evidence (like election fraud, vaccine, Hunter's laptop, BLM riots, etc) and turn no evidence into clear evidence (anything Trump related, Rittenhouse trial, etc).
It's like they have no soul and zero integrity.
i have long said that "evidence" is anything that you will accept as such
Watch VAXXED. GREED_IS_GOOD.
Sorry GAW does not let me reply for some reason
What are you talking about?
Not going to try to change your view. Your view continually provides incredibly valuable information to back up what I know to be true.
There's more evidence that I cause autism. Sorry about your autism. I'll try to stop.
And that's why he was found not guilty of it
100%
Can't change reality.
That is a weird comparison. The one has TONS of evidence while the latter has none.....Its already been proven and adjudicated by courts that there is definitive proof that links the massive increase in childhood vaccines and the huge rise in autism over the last 40 years. The proper way to do this statement would have been to compare the BS rape insinuation to something else that has very little, but probable truth. The end result is that even that pathetic example had more evidence than this stupid bitch and her politically motivated rape charge.
I would need to see real evidence of either.
Neither are real. Imo.
Emperical evidence
All I meant is autism isn't real.
Just another condition created for profit.
Well there is a school of thought that autism is just a natural part of a wide spectrum.
They call it “neuro-diversity”
And they celebrate it, like its good to be brain damaged.
OP is always talking about these things but never providing sources. Weird
https://i.redd.it/1rb482xb9ty41.png
One would assume with a username like that, you would have at least a few sources handy. The fact you don’t says a lot. I think it’s plausible but haven’t seen this proof you speak of
“Evidence” is whatever you will accept as such
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/Concerns/Autism/cdc2004pediatrics.html
Would you mind sharing the “evidence” that somehow convinced you that vaccines DO NOT cause autism?”
Looking forward to laughing at you for trusting “studies” and accepting them as evidence to “prove a negative”
You don’t need evidence to prove a negative. In this case the negative is assumed true until you show any evidence to the contrary. And of course when I’m looking into a topic I don’t bother saving links for things that go along with the current narrative. What would be the point?
It’s funny how people get hostile for simply being asked for a source for their claim. One would think you would want people to ask so you could show them the evidence. But after seeing your evidence I get it.
If anything, the ~3% increase in autism as your link shows is an argument for more studies but it doesn’t prove vaccines cause autism.
When someone says “vaccines cause autism” most people don’t think of a 3% raise, they think of a significant raise. If you framed it as “vaccines slightly raise the likelihood of autism” you might find more people willing to listen.
WHY did the CDC do a vaccine-autism study in 2004?