Satellite data shows NO global warming for the last 8.75 years.
(principia-scientific.com)
🤡 CLIMATE CONTROL 🤡
Comments (15)
sorted by:
How dare you ;)
If you look on this map where they take the majority of the ground temps from, you will see most are at airports, often on the tarmac with aircraft passing. Pick a dot and zoom in and see.......
https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/maps/lcd/
These pictures are a bit old now but they illustrate two things:
The areas with the most CO2 are not the warmest.
The areas with the smallest number of thermometers are warming the most.
On the 2nd point, the less data to manipulate and fewer people to call it out makes for easier manipulation.
There's some nuance. When we talk about points like this, we're talking about very sparsely populated parts of the Earth like Western Australia, Siberia, northern Canada, some of the remote parts of the Amazon, etc. Especially for the points on the coasts and in the extreme north and south latitudes, this is really important. Why?
Because when you do global temperature modeling, you divide up the planet into squares in order for the computer to model them, something like 5 km^2 blocks, but I've seen some that get more ambitious than that. In order to start the model, they have to give the computer a starting temperature value for all of those blocks. But if they don't have temperature recordings from weather stations in each of those 5 km^2 blocks, they have to "approximate." They take the one remote weather station closest and simply fill in the data for the surrounding blocks. So, if you manipulate those sites specifically and make them falsely hot, the impact in the models is greatly exaggerated. Take a site out in the desert of Western Australia and make it a degree hotter and now half the continent plus all of the surrounding water looks hotter.
This is even worse on the oceans. As you certainly know, 70% of the world's surface is ocean. Our measurements are taken by ships who do recordings as they sail along common trade routes. Naturally, there are some huge limitations to the quality of that data, the most obvious of which is that there are huge parts of the ocean where ships just don't go all that often. The same process happens. Some scientist takes the closest available reading and uses it to fill in data for huge chunks of the ocean. They violate the most basic rule in science which is to use mathematical calculations at a far higher level of precision than their data allow.
Thanks for that.
It's minimal warming going back to 1998. They used to call it "the pause." In 2015 leading up to the Paris climate conference, NOAA released brand new data in which they used a BS statistical method to "homogenize" the temperature data and they basically added an upward trend to the data. We got a month's worth of non-stop hyperventilating in the mainstream press about the "hottest year EVAR!" and sure enough, we got the Paris Climate Accords where Hussein promised $100 billion/yr in wealth redistribution from the US.
Anyway, the point is that these propagandists masquerading as scientists have abused the unusually warm 1998 El Niño effect to try and make the modern era look much warmer than it is, instead of telling people the honest truth that there are normal cycles in the Pacific and the Atlantic that cause temperatures to go up and down on a decadal scale and this is totally normal.
I taught HS math for 40+ years before retiring in 20. Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II, Pre-Calculus, & Calculus were all sound math courses with real world applications. But when I saw the textbooks for statistics, especially at the AP or college level, they didn’t make mathematical sense except for the basic levels. They allow the user to make up conclusions that are far from truthful or an accurate representation of the study. As Mark Twain once said, There are lies, damn lies, and statistics.”
One of my favorite headlines were:
(Paraphrasing)
"Why record cold weather doesn't mean global warming isn't happening".
Cool so.... you guys are just removing super cold data points then to keep the average high?
That can't be true. I just got a solicitation mail from the Sierra Club today, and right on the envelope it says:
OUR PLANET IS BURNING
What are YOU going to do about it?
Surely they wouldn't lie, would they?
Is donating to their organization going to put out the “fire”?
Let me tell you how this will work out:
Fully debunked and nothing to see here! It is what they did last time.
That's the man versus woman sexual turn on amplifier
I forget where I heard it, but it was a NWS guy, being interviewed, who mentioned the above and then added that in those 8 1/2 years the world has expelled an unrivaled amount of CO2, proving once and for all that man made CO2 has no correlation to climate change/global warming/cooling