So, no sauce? That’s not how this works. YOU made a claim. YOU post the sauce to back up the claim. Others aren’t expected to validate the claim YOU made.
Just last week Trump mentioned True the Vote during the his CNN interview.
And when 2000 Mules came out Trump hosted a massive viewing party at Mar a Lago that was attended by pretty much everyone who matters in the MAGA movement.
You should ask yourself when did Trump say Phillips wasn’t trustworthy... because I’m pretty sure he never has.
Literally where and when did Trump say that Phillips is "trustworthy"?
He has repeatedly implied this about both Gregg and Catherine.
I'm not going to dig through all his statements. Find out for yourself: https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump
Ivanka posted a photo with TTV and Catherine's name.
So, no sauce? That’s not how this works. YOU made a claim. YOU post the sauce to back up the claim. Others aren’t expected to validate the claim YOU made.
Take that weak game back to reddit. The fools there will waste time on it.
Here at GAW, you are expected to have a base level of knowledge. No spoon-feeding.
You should already be paying attention to what Trump says, in which case you'd have noticed the multiple times he spoke well of Phillips.
Weak game? It’s a burden of proof fallacy by you.
And once again, deflection.
The demand for sauce is a GLP thing, it does not apply to Anons. We were taught how to dig for ourselves and not rely on someone to do it for you.
His point is that Trump threw his support behind him. That makes him trustworthy.
Just last week Trump mentioned True the Vote during the his CNN interview.
And when 2000 Mules came out Trump hosted a massive viewing party at Mar a Lago that was attended by pretty much everyone who matters in the MAGA movement.
You should ask yourself when did Trump say Phillips wasn’t trustworthy... because I’m pretty sure he never has.