All anons should be wary when reading ANY type of published news article or commentary. We know the CIA infiltrates all levels of U.S. media, so it is likely anything you read in print has been through the Agency filter for allowable publication. Watch for limited hangouts, diversion tactics, logical fallacies, Orwellian newspeak, etc etc. From this article:
That so many journalists don’t get it [the seriousness of the Durham report] underscores why public trust in the media is at an all-time low.
Wildly off base assessment of the Legacy Media. It's not that "journalists don't get it," it's that "journalists are majority liberal" or "journalists work for three-letter agencies."
"Why did Trump supporters storm the Capitol? Because they believed Trump’s false claims that the election was being stolen. And why did they believe him? If the media lied to them about Trump’s collusion with Russia, why should they trust reports that Trump’s election claims were false?"
Talk about not wanting to get to the bottom of a scandal. This guy is unintentionally hilarious and depressing at the same time.
I did not read the article.
I have been talking to some anti Trump people. They can't even explain in detail why they don't like him. It's all emotion.
An article like this could be for people like the people I talk too. They will reject anything that is Trump positive. Something like this could be a starting point to brake through their "programming"
"You can't rationalize facts with someone whose position is based on emotion (ego)." Ed Dowd said that in an interview and I have it on my computer as a reminder.
This is why people have to be shown. They have to arrive at the truth on their own precisely because their ego is in the way.
I dont think you guys understand how huge this is. Sure, the writer isn't where we are......yet.....he's just beginning his journey. But giving credit to the Durham report and sharing it with their readers IS going to plant a lot of seeds. I've seen several other MSM news sources in the last few days come to similar conclusions.
This guy’s article was poorly constructed shit. And the lefties in the comment section are so off their rockers that Barrack Obama could confession on live television that he loves Big Mike’s Big Mike (and he also kills kids) and the media and libtards would applaud that he was progressive of transgender marriage before it was popular and that his support of post-birth, later term abortions for children under the age of 18 is inspiring.
This collapse in trust — particularly among the 74 million Americans who voted for Trump — directly contributed to the events of Jan 6., 2021. Why did Trump supporters storm the Capitol? Because they believed Trump’s false claims that the election was being stolen. And why did they believe him? If the media lied to them about Trump’s collusion with Russia, why should they trust reports that Trump’s election claims were false?
I wish they would stop saying his "false claims."
The fact that they need to tell us what to think shows this is more propaganda.
But at least it's putting the darn report on their radar.
Still, we know the election was stolen.
Biden said he was going to do it. "We have put together the most extensive and diverse fraud organization, I think, in the history of American politics."
Newsweek, I believe it was, wrote an article about why they needed to rig the election (fortify, they called it).
Oh, and then there was the article by Anonymous even earlier about how they obstructed Trump in everything he did when he was in office.
They believed the Russian collusion story, therefore it was their duty to stop him.
They need to hear THIS:
You believed a pack of liars tell you a good person was a monster.
Therefore, you helped the people who want to harm you, while hurting the person (and people) who wanted to help you. That is why the Durham Report is important. It shows how it happened.
All anons should be wary when reading ANY type of published news article or commentary. We know the CIA infiltrates all levels of U.S. media, so it is likely anything you read in print has been through the Agency filter for allowable publication. Watch for limited hangouts, diversion tactics, logical fallacies, Orwellian newspeak, etc etc. From this article:
Wildly off base assessment of the Legacy Media. It's not that "journalists don't get it," it's that "journalists are majority liberal" or "journalists work for three-letter agencies."
"Why did Trump supporters storm the Capitol? Because they believed Trump’s false claims that the election was being stolen. And why did they believe him? If the media lied to them about Trump’s collusion with Russia, why should they trust reports that Trump’s election claims were false?"
Talk about not wanting to get to the bottom of a scandal. This guy is unintentionally hilarious and depressing at the same time.
I did not read the article. I have been talking to some anti Trump people. They can't even explain in detail why they don't like him. It's all emotion.
An article like this could be for people like the people I talk too. They will reject anything that is Trump positive. Something like this could be a starting point to brake through their "programming"
"You can't rationalize facts with someone whose position is based on emotion (ego)." Ed Dowd said that in an interview and I have it on my computer as a reminder.
This is why people have to be shown. They have to arrive at the truth on their own precisely because their ego is in the way.
It appears to me that is all that brainwashing is. Playing into ego.
Good point.
He is so close to getting it, yet simultaneously so far.
Evil shepherds leading their sheep readers ever closer to the cliff’s edge with their staff of misinformation…
I dont think you guys understand how huge this is. Sure, the writer isn't where we are......yet.....he's just beginning his journey. But giving credit to the Durham report and sharing it with their readers IS going to plant a lot of seeds. I've seen several other MSM news sources in the last few days come to similar conclusions.
Well the headline should raise some normy eyebrows.
This guy’s article was poorly constructed shit. And the lefties in the comment section are so off their rockers that Barrack Obama could confession on live television that he loves Big Mike’s Big Mike (and he also kills kids) and the media and libtards would applaud that he was progressive of transgender marriage before it was popular and that his support of post-birth, later term abortions for children under the age of 18 is inspiring.
Yeah, he's WAY off.
I wish they would stop saying his "false claims."
The fact that they need to tell us what to think shows this is more propaganda.
But at least it's putting the darn report on their radar.
Still, we know the election was stolen.
Biden said he was going to do it. "We have put together the most extensive and diverse fraud organization, I think, in the history of American politics."
Newsweek, I believe it was, wrote an article about why they needed to rig the election (fortify, they called it).
Oh, and then there was the article by Anonymous even earlier about how they obstructed Trump in everything he did when he was in office.
They believed the Russian collusion story, therefore it was their duty to stop him.
They need to hear THIS:
You believed a pack of liars tell you a good person was a monster.
Therefore, you helped the people who want to harm you, while hurting the person (and people) who wanted to help you. That is why the Durham Report is important. It shows how it happened.
I doubt it was WaPo themselves who allowed it 😎
https://archive.is/gEQTz
Thanks!
Another example of "MSM devolution"??? NY Post, CNN town hall, several outlets agreeing with Durham report findings?
https://archive.is/gEQTz