Try to find some interior pics of the twin towers. I was in one of the towers back in 1980 and even at the top of those buildings the support columns were massive. I'm talking about two inch thick steel girders. How can an airplane cut through several girders even when a bird and a hail stone can cause such damage? We've been lied to for a couple of hundred years. Heads need to roll for all the lies and theft which has occured.
TDLR: The building would have shredded the plane, and proper fire retardant system would have allowed the fuel to burn itself out in less than 2 hours with virtually zero structural damage to the building (superficial damage is NOT structural damage).
They intentionally monkeyed with the fire retardant coating on the targeted floors for one of the buildings to make sure there was a big fire:
In 1995, The Port Authority performed a study to establish requirements for retrofit of sprayed insulation to the floor trusses during major alterations when tenants vacated spaces in the towers [13]. Based on design information for fire ratings of a similar, but not identical, composite floor truss system contained in the Fire Resistance Directory published by Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., the study concluded that a 38 mm (1.5 in.) thickness of sprayed mineral fiber material would provide a 2 h fire rating, consistent with the Class 1B requirements. In 1999, the removal of existing SFRM and the application of new material to this thickness became Port Authority policy for full floors undergoing new construction and renovation. In the years between 1995 and 2001, thermal protection was upgraded on 18 floors of WTC 1, including those on which the major fires occurred on September 11, 2001, and 13 floors of WTC 2 that did not include the fire floors.
Design of World Trade Center Towers: Aircraft Impact
The structural engineers on the project also considered the possibility that an aircraft could crash into the building. In July 1945, a B-25 bomber that was lost in the fog had crashed into the 78th and 79th floors of the Empire State Building. A year later, another airplane crashed into the 40 Wall Street building, and there was another close call at the Empire State Building.[116] In designing the World Trade Center, Leslie Robertson considered the scenario of the impact of a jet airliner, the Boeing 707, which might be lost in the fog, seeking to land at JFK or at Newark airports.[117] The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) found a three-page white paper that mentioned another aircraft impact analysis, involving impact of a jet at 600 mph (970 km/h), was indeed considered, but NIST could not locate the documentary evidence of the aircraft impact analysis.[118]
Note that the 707 was a smaller version and earlier derivative model of the planes that supposedly hit with similar structural construction as a largely aluminum skin attached to minimal 7000 series aluminum frames and spars.
"They intentionally monkeyed with the fire retardant coating on the targeted floors" and of course this was for the decoy fire that didn't do shit for the actual demo anyway
Agreed. The fires and explosions were for "show". Clearly some sort of concrete pulverization and timed charges on support columns caused the demolition.
Check this shit out. This is one of the most significant posts I've ever seen on GAW. Note the lengthy comment subthread between me and the esteemed OP explaining this shit in detail.
Try to find some interior pics of the twin towers. I was in one of the towers back in 1980 and even at the top of those buildings the support columns were massive. I'm talking about two inch thick steel girders. How can an airplane cut through several girders even when a bird and a hail stone can cause such damage? We've been lied to for a couple of hundred years. Heads need to roll for all the lies and theft which has occured.
TDLR: The building would have shredded the plane, and proper fire retardant system would have allowed the fuel to burn itself out in less than 2 hours with virtually zero structural damage to the building (superficial damage is NOT structural damage).
They intentionally monkeyed with the fire retardant coating on the targeted floors for one of the buildings to make sure there was a big fire:
"Overview of the Structural Design of World Trade Center 1, 2, and 7 Buildings", NIST; https://tsapps.nist.gov/publication/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=910105
Did they hit the wrong floors on WTC2? The intended targeted ones likely had the thermal protection also modified like WTC1.
Both towers designed to withstand the impact of an aircraft and associated fires due to impact of a B-25 bomber airplane into Empire State Building in 1945: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1945_Empire_State_Building_B-25_crash
Design of World Trade Center Towers: Aircraft Impact
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construction_of_the_World_Trade_Center
Note that the 707 was a smaller version and earlier derivative model of the planes that supposedly hit with similar structural construction as a largely aluminum skin attached to minimal 7000 series aluminum frames and spars.
"They intentionally monkeyed with the fire retardant coating on the targeted floors" and of course this was for the decoy fire that didn't do shit for the actual demo anyway
Agreed. The fires and explosions were for "show". Clearly some sort of concrete pulverization and timed charges on support columns caused the demolition.
Check this shit out. This is one of the most significant posts I've ever seen on GAW. Note the lengthy comment subthread between me and the esteemed OP explaining this shit in detail.
u/catsfive thanks again this one was top tier.
https://greatawakening.win/p/15JmxKyP5U/jeff-pragers-ppt-911-preso-the-t/c/
The vertical columns were 5" thick at the bottom.