A lil 9/11 truth for ya
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (69)
sorted by:
I'm a structural sheetmetal aircraft mechanic.
I have no problem with the damage these planes did.
Wings skins are very thick 7075 T- 6 aluminum. It's almost as hard as steel to drill. At the speed they were going,that damage is not surprising.
Important to note that, as I'm sure you know, materials react differently to milling or cutting than they do at high speed impacts.
In almost every instance, the harder something is, the more brittle it is. If you flung a diamond hard enough, it would either chip or break entirely.
Obviously if it's too soft, it'd bend or shear off on impact.
I'm not in the "no planes" club as there have been a lot of first hand accounts that there were, but the way those towers (and a certain other building) went down was definitely suspect, especially considering it was built to withstand such impacts to begin with.
Yeah im with you...the being baffled is mostly a product of us not seeing these types of things happen so its hard to imagine how it can happen that way. If commercial airliners hit buildings full speed on a regular basis we could see over and over what theyre capable of. Its the shock of seeing a novel incident makes you immediately think “how is that possible?”
The concord hit an apartment building outside of Paris.
The picture should be on google. It has very extensive damage. And their isn't much wreckage to see either.....
Look up the 747 accident from 1992 hitting the 11 storey apartment block.
And which speeds exactly were "they" at again?
Anything over stalling speed would do that damage.
And since the planes were actually flying and not dropping like rocks, they were above that speed.
Ok genius.
No seriously, what was the IAS at the time, according to the official narrative?
Don't know or care. And read what I actually say.
I have no problem with the fact that the govt did it. When I say I belive the planes easily did that damage. It doesn't invalidate the above statement. I have other disagreements as well. But they are not important,if I belive the govt did it.
Oh fuck off, no you are not. You are a $0.50 per post faggot.
Gotcha.
No one with a worthwhile high school education would (honestly) say such a stupid thing.
Why is that surprising? And why do you take it so persoanal?
Q: Why is that surprising?
A: The (other) 5% who can think of course understand.
is the same (the same) as
2 smashing 550 mph steel girders into thin (lairs say "thick") aluminium sheets
I've changed every single major structural component on the large aircraft I work on.
If anything I'm more surprise that more of the plane didn't come out the backside of the building.
Go and get yourself an A and P license and 20 years of experience and get back to me,
You are a lying fucking retard Nazi who has no idea what he is talking about.
The average cruising speed for a 747 is Mach 0.85 or 652 mph. Just because you say things forcefully does not make them true. They fly faster than 550 mph as a routine every day occurrence.
Source of my speed claim: https://www.stratosjets.com/blog/cruise-speed/#:~:text=On%20average%2C%20the%20typical%20cruising,knots%20(roughly%20575%20mph).