The reason it hasn't gone hot, is them in check. The reason it has taken them so long to deteriorate our society is them in check. People's ignorance is what you are getting at as the problem, but they are entranced in a media lull. Try and break the bewitching as you will, I'm sure everyone here has hit many Brickwalls behind the keyboard plenty. Exhausting usually to no avail. But the guns have given these toads the luxury of being so damn ignorant.
Innocent people could be hurt or killed if I don't maintain proficiency with my handgun, so that is crucial to maintain. I spend too much time behind the keyboard with you guys as it is. ;)
And what good is a keyboard against an armed-to-the-teeth malicious government?
The only reason information is any threat whatsoever is because it has the potential to change the minds of those who already have arms. Once you give up your arms, you're dead. Period.
Personally, I think it’s because propaganda is more effective at producing compliant serfs than threats of violence.“
The threats of violence are the most effective. “Let us remove your earnings or armed government goons will point guns at you, shackle you, throw you in a cage, and give you a ‘criminal’ record” is definitely the main motivation for people becoming serfs.
The propaganda plays an important role in giving some of the serfs an opportunity to rationalize their serfdom as if it was their own idea: “I want to pay my ‘fair share’ of the ‘social contract’” and other brow-beaten excuses.
I’ve mentioned before how the Whiskey tax and the suppression of its protesters were almost immediate examples of the failure of the Constitution to protect people from aristocratic taxation. The whiskey tax was repealed, so we can’t claim that it has had an enduring influence on people’s freedom. The legacy of that era is the demonstration of how the government can impose unfair taxation, such as the income tax legislation of 1913.
Your second paragraph isn’t really my main point, but I wouldn’t disagree with it. It’s a primitive world out there, and the threat of violence looms behind many interactions. The second amendment’s term “militia” refers to citizen force rather than government force, and “well regulated” means well provisioned with violent weapons.
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
In other words, a citizenry that can threaten violence is necessary for freedom.
Merely the THREAT of conflict maintains peace.
When certain states begin subverting the BoR, some people will rise up.
The questions surrounding legality of armed revolt are then nullified by Marbury vs. Madison.
You only look to the many millions dead in communist controlled countries to understand the gun is a necessity to keep the rogue governments from going to all out murder to get compliance.
Our forefathers knew this more than 200 years ago, and that is why they made the citizens right to bear firerams second only to their right fo speak freely. They knew without the 2A there would be no 1A.
Without the guns the pograms would come regardless of the information age. They don't give a shit if every last person knows when they don't have any means to put a stop to them.
No. guns in the hands of citizens keep the government in check-
The reason it hasn't gone hot, is them in check. The reason it has taken them so long to deteriorate our society is them in check. People's ignorance is what you are getting at as the problem, but they are entranced in a media lull. Try and break the bewitching as you will, I'm sure everyone here has hit many Brickwalls behind the keyboard plenty. Exhausting usually to no avail. But the guns have given these toads the luxury of being so damn ignorant.
💯 exactly
Guns in the possession of free people are the insurance to try to avoid the outcome of a tyrannical Government oppressing it's own citizens.
The keyboard will assist in revealing and spreading the information to awaken the masses as to the "Evil" that lurks beyond their consciousness.
Always remember, without the gun to protect it,the free keyboard won't exist!
Great answer! Nailed it!
https://jpfo.org/
https://www.gunowners.org/ (Ron Paul Endorsed over NRA!- before the JPFO was founded)
Thanks for those links,fren. Very much appreciated!
You're welcome!
If someone breaks into your house will you reach for your gun or your computer?
Innocent people could be hurt or killed if I don't maintain proficiency with my handgun, so that is crucial to maintain. I spend too much time behind the keyboard with you guys as it is. ;)
And what good is a keyboard against an armed-to-the-teeth malicious government?
The only reason information is any threat whatsoever is because it has the potential to change the minds of those who already have arms. Once you give up your arms, you're dead. Period.
The threats of violence are the most effective. “Let us remove your earnings or armed government goons will point guns at you, shackle you, throw you in a cage, and give you a ‘criminal’ record” is definitely the main motivation for people becoming serfs.
The propaganda plays an important role in giving some of the serfs an opportunity to rationalize their serfdom as if it was their own idea: “I want to pay my ‘fair share’ of the ‘social contract’” and other brow-beaten excuses.
I’ve mentioned before how the Whiskey tax and the suppression of its protesters were almost immediate examples of the failure of the Constitution to protect people from aristocratic taxation. The whiskey tax was repealed, so we can’t claim that it has had an enduring influence on people’s freedom. The legacy of that era is the demonstration of how the government can impose unfair taxation, such as the income tax legislation of 1913.
Your second paragraph isn’t really my main point, but I wouldn’t disagree with it. It’s a primitive world out there, and the threat of violence looms behind many interactions. The second amendment’s term “militia” refers to citizen force rather than government force, and “well regulated” means well provisioned with violent weapons.
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
In other words, a citizenry that can threaten violence is necessary for freedom.
2A is in case 1-10 are threatened. Period.
Merely the THREAT of conflict maintains peace. When certain states begin subverting the BoR, some people will rise up. The questions surrounding legality of armed revolt are then nullified by Marbury vs. Madison.
Without the 2A there is not guarantee you would be able to use your keyboard. The Gun is the only thing that insures you have the other rights
if guns go away they will come in and take you and your keyboard and do whatever the hell they want to you.
re: 2A... even more importantly, "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
You only look to the many millions dead in communist controlled countries to understand the gun is a necessity to keep the rogue governments from going to all out murder to get compliance.
Our forefathers knew this more than 200 years ago, and that is why they made the citizens right to bear firerams second only to their right fo speak freely. They knew without the 2A there would be no 1A.
Without the guns the pograms would come regardless of the information age. They don't give a shit if every last person knows when they don't have any means to put a stop to them.
I guess from the tone of all your replies, you are advocating that America should just give up and join Britain and Australia.
Its not going to happen, but don't stop trying.
Stop trying to hide.
No one that believes in the 2A throws out such bullshit.