1 Why would there be a MSM press video that shows him wearing and scratching a rubber prosthetic on his neck that is obviously connected to a full facial or complete head mask prosthetic if it he had plastic surgery? Does plastic surgery now include plastic prosthetics that you need to wear all the time? Does Biden now have an incredulous burn victim story that we don't know about, and he has to have a full face plastic covering that seems to change from season to season that we don't know about??
And why would the MSM allow this footage to be played on their channels, live in their news coverage, when they have the ability to edit things that are filmed live, because there is a built in 2 minute delay during livefeeds? Why would they air this live for all the normies to see?
2 Why is there a very high resolution stock photo of "him" on Getty images with a clear view of a tab right below his earlobe? (For reference, Getty images are all copyrighted, stock images. These are LEGIT images, not adulterated.) This tab is clearly part of the mask prosthetic that this actor/person portraying Biden was wearing at that time. This image is still on Getty images and in their permanent catalogue for all to see and use with a subscription to their services.
3 Why is "pResident" Biden getting "plastic surgery" every few months? His appearance is constantly changing.
4 Does he need plastic surgery also alter voice now? Why does he even need plastic surgery to alter his voice? And why so many surgeries to alter his voice with each different appearance of a different looking pResident?
It's not a conspiracy theory. It is conspiracy fact: there are different Bidens. It is more of a conspiracy theory to suggest its all just plastic surgery, lol.
Really? Are you a shill or something or are we just back in 8th grade? Do you even have an argument to contradict this? This isn't even a conspiracy theory. There is literal photo and video evidence that is available to the public which proves the facts that I'm stating.
I've talked about all this over and over. Where have you been? You don't seem to have figured out photos are subject to personal interpretation. If you are convinced it means something then you will see it as proof.
The "rubber prosthetic" is his...old skin.
Those kind of masks don't have "tabs" in that area. They pull over the entire head. What is it? I don't know. I don't think it can be a mask though.
Everyone's appearance changes depending on a lot of things. You are seeing something you think is extraordinary because you are all wrapped up in this idea but it's just the same guy at different times.
4 . You think his voice is somehow different but there is no evidence of that. He sounds exactly the same to these ears, just older now.
Clones age at the same rate as any human….why the hell you clone someone at birth if they are destined to be a garbage man etc.? Was cloning even being done when some of these fossils were born? The mask thing is weak to me as well.
Are you referring to the planes as being cgi? From the evidence I've seen about it (if you can call it evidence), I don't know what to think. The errors in the official video demonstrate that cgi was used and was flawed. The witnesses on the ground were cia plants (I recall that from years ago). Sorry I have no sauce... I just know what I've seen and what I remember from the research I did. The fact that they never found any significant parts of the planes is another thing... except for an engine on the ground a few blocks of way, not really smashed up from landing and bouncing on pavement... but instead pretty intact... and, from a different model plane than is reported that was hijacked and flown into the building. Too many questions. Too many oddities. So, yeah, I'm leaning towards a total psyop, and the buildings were simply wired for demolition and the cgi planes created the narrative.
I have zero respect for anyone believing the CGI theory, yet claiming to have done research. Here are 18 different views of Flight 175 hitting the South Tower. All were available within hours of the attacks.
Debunk them. Prove each one of them is CGI. You cant. You won't.
I am not convinced either way. Your video is good. But I think the cia could have done every single one of your videos... as well as the ones I posted. I am going to go with what I think is more realistic... the cia created all of it.
So earlobes attach themselves to the side of the head at a certain age?
Look. I’m not arguing one side or another, but you shouldn’t be either. You’re not convinced? Fine. But do t actually ARGUE the other side when your guess is no better than anyone else’s.
Why do people who claim masks and clones not acknowledge he had plastic surgery? They get mad when you tell them.
First, ask yourself a few basic questions:
And why would the MSM allow this footage to be played on their channels, live in their news coverage, when they have the ability to edit things that are filmed live, because there is a built in 2 minute delay during livefeeds? Why would they air this live for all the normies to see?
2 Why is there a very high resolution stock photo of "him" on Getty images with a clear view of a tab right below his earlobe? (For reference, Getty images are all copyrighted, stock images. These are LEGIT images, not adulterated.) This tab is clearly part of the mask prosthetic that this actor/person portraying Biden was wearing at that time. This image is still on Getty images and in their permanent catalogue for all to see and use with a subscription to their services.
3 Why is "pResident" Biden getting "plastic surgery" every few months? His appearance is constantly changing.
4 Does he need plastic surgery also alter voice now? Why does he even need plastic surgery to alter his voice? And why so many surgeries to alter his voice with each different appearance of a different looking pResident?
It's not a conspiracy theory. It is conspiracy fact: there are different Bidens. It is more of a conspiracy theory to suggest its all just plastic surgery, lol.
You act like those are facts.
Really? Are you a shill or something or are we just back in 8th grade? Do you even have an argument to contradict this? This isn't even a conspiracy theory. There is literal photo and video evidence that is available to the public which proves the facts that I'm stating.
I've talked about all this over and over. Where have you been? You don't seem to have figured out photos are subject to personal interpretation. If you are convinced it means something then you will see it as proof.
The "rubber prosthetic" is his...old skin.
Those kind of masks don't have "tabs" in that area. They pull over the entire head. What is it? I don't know. I don't think it can be a mask though.
Everyone's appearance changes depending on a lot of things. You are seeing something you think is extraordinary because you are all wrapped up in this idea but it's just the same guy at different times.
4 . You think his voice is somehow different but there is no evidence of that. He sounds exactly the same to these ears, just older now.
Clones age at the same rate as any human….why the hell you clone someone at birth if they are destined to be a garbage man etc.? Was cloning even being done when some of these fossils were born? The mask thing is weak to me as well.
the Biden Clone/Mask psyop is similar to the CGI 9/11 psyop
An absurd proposition designed to undermine consensus.
Are you referring to the planes as being cgi? From the evidence I've seen about it (if you can call it evidence), I don't know what to think. The errors in the official video demonstrate that cgi was used and was flawed. The witnesses on the ground were cia plants (I recall that from years ago). Sorry I have no sauce... I just know what I've seen and what I remember from the research I did. The fact that they never found any significant parts of the planes is another thing... except for an engine on the ground a few blocks of way, not really smashed up from landing and bouncing on pavement... but instead pretty intact... and, from a different model plane than is reported that was hijacked and flown into the building. Too many questions. Too many oddities. So, yeah, I'm leaning towards a total psyop, and the buildings were simply wired for demolition and the cgi planes created the narrative.
I have zero respect for anyone believing the CGI theory, yet claiming to have done research. Here are 18 different views of Flight 175 hitting the South Tower. All were available within hours of the attacks.
Debunk them. Prove each one of them is CGI. You cant. You won't.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YLm3pkAiJQ&pp=ygUWNTAgdmlld3Mgb2YgZmxpZ2h0IDE3NQ%3D%3D
well, there's this...
https://www.reddit.com/link/m5oxmb/video/l2cumweq08n61/player
I am not convinced either way. Your video is good. But I think the cia could have done every single one of your videos... as well as the ones I posted. I am going to go with what I think is more realistic... the cia created all of it.
Right on, Ian.
OMG!! He looks different than he did years ago!!
Biden from the 80's looks different than Biden from 2008, too.
It's called aging.
https://tucson.com/news/national/photos-joe-biden-through-the-years/collection_4d66f395-9ed7-5ef7-ad93-2f5b1533191b.html#22
So earlobes attach themselves to the side of the head at a certain age?
Look. I’m not arguing one side or another, but you shouldn’t be either. You’re not convinced? Fine. But do t actually ARGUE the other side when your guess is no better than anyone else’s.