Stanford study re:EV charging. So now they dont want us charging at home. Why should it be convenient!π Good luck with the infrastructure for that, California, (who can't even build a train)!π
(www.thebrighterside.news)
π€‘ CLIMATE CONTROL π€‘
Comments (12)
sorted by:
This is very very bad for independence and autonomy. Not being able to charge you car at home is going to eventually mean being dependent on the whims of third parties. Just when you really need your car, for an evacuation for example, you won't be able to charge it.
I see all kinds of problems brewing from this, and 'control' being their solution to all of them.
A big hit to the convivence of charging at your own home. Why have solar panels if you have to send all power to the grid? lol solar/wind urban fools. I appreciate alternative energy when in rural areas or with poor power grids, but makes no sense for most city dwellers to have panels unless they are solar thermal to heat water.
Thatβs why they want you to have a smart thermostat in your house- they are going to be able to set your thermostat to avoid brown outs
Let's see, charging the same number of EVs during the day rather than overnight is somehow going to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while requiring less electricity to be generated and stored.
Well I suppose that this logic will certainly convince those people who insisted that I needed to be injected with a mystery substance in order for their injection to be effective.
There should be lots of EVs available on the cheap when the injections start working.
Win-win
Exactly what I thought when I read that.
EVs are not about 'saving the environment'. It is about control. Most of all, they are intended as a dead-end for personal transportation. All those people with EVs are going to be tied with a mill-stone around their necks. Once the battery becomes useless, they will bear the cost of disposing them. I believe this will be an astronomically high cost to the owner. The WEF doesn't want people to own vehicles, period. They want you to take mass transit.
Recently, I watched a Twitter video about the murdered victim who was shoved in front of a Minneapolis transit train. The horror of seeing the aftermath of this has shocked the public to the core. In addition, the news clip reported that there's a dramatic increase of violence and crime on these transit trains. People are starting to avoid them as a result. The police chief responded in an interview and urged the public to use the transit system to avoid crime and violence..... Say what?
Did you get that?
There's a disconnect of logic here. The transit system violence and crime is the reason why people are avoiding it. Instead, the police chief is telling everyone that using the transit system makes people safer. It's as if these politicians, like Mayor Frey and his police chief, are high on psychotropic drugs. They make no sense at all. It's all irrational jibberish.
They are βsteeringβ the dialogue simply because during the day they can count on solar panels but not during the night. During the night they only maybe have wind, nuclear and gas or coal. That is only reason for this trash study.
A gas station near my house has two EV charging stations. I'm still trying to figure out how the fuck that's supposed to work.
I'm hoping I never have to find out. π€