That would just force "secret societies" to actually be secret, and not just "behind closed doors".
Like, how many people in Govt. are members of the Illuminati (or perhaps a descendent of that organization)? Who knows, because the very existence of the society is actually a secret.
And what is a "secret society" anyways? Is it the CFR? The CFR is constructed exactly like a secret society, but it doesn't call itself a secret society. It does however have a huge influence on public policy. What about any other "Think Tank?" Those are also secret societies in all but name.
The problem is not in "questionable virtues and loyalties" of the people in our government, the problem is that we have a system of government that has Sovereign Power over a vassal We The People. The US Govt claims the Sovereign Right to Rule over Us. It accomplishes its fuckery through fraudulent claims of Jurisdiction over our Individual Jurisdiction. Our biggest problem is that we believe our "Constitutional Republic" is "good" at it's core, when in fact these Jurisdictional frauds are built into it from the beginning.
The solution is not some EO, or law, or even Constitutional Amendment. The solution is for We The People to choose a new form of government, one that recognizes our Sovereign Nature and clearly acknowledges our Jurisdiction, which cannot be infringed by any non-fraudulent government.
Once people understand their Jurisdiction and their Ultimate Authority (Sovereignty) over it, no tyrannical government can possibly exist.
Especially if the "secret societies" definition is either too specific that the targets we are trying to catch slip through the net, or too vague that an unacceptable number of innocent organizations and people get wrongfully targeted.
Came here to say more or less what you did, but I wanted to add that even if the definition is strict, it can be broadened by later redefinitions or court rulings.
That would just force "secret societies" to actually be secret, and not just "behind closed doors".
Like, how many people in Govt. are members of the Illuminati (or perhaps a descendent of that organization)? Who knows, because the very existence of the society is actually a secret.
And what is a "secret society" anyways? Is it the CFR? The CFR is constructed exactly like a secret society, but it doesn't call itself a secret society. It does however have a huge influence on public policy. What about any other "Think Tank?" Those are also secret societies in all but name.
The problem is not in "questionable virtues and loyalties" of the people in our government, the problem is that we have a system of government that has Sovereign Power over a vassal We The People. The US Govt claims the Sovereign Right to Rule over Us. It accomplishes its fuckery through fraudulent claims of Jurisdiction over our Individual Jurisdiction. Our biggest problem is that we believe our "Constitutional Republic" is "good" at it's core, when in fact these Jurisdictional frauds are built into it from the beginning.
The solution is not some EO, or law, or even Constitutional Amendment. The solution is for We The People to choose a new form of government, one that recognizes our Sovereign Nature and clearly acknowledges our Jurisdiction, which cannot be infringed by any non-fraudulent government.
Once people understand their Jurisdiction and their Ultimate Authority (Sovereignty) over it, no tyrannical government can possibly exist.
Yes Masons are corrupt. But to ask for the federal government to carry out an effective ban on "secret societies" is so damn foolish.
Especially if the "secret societies" definition is either too specific that the targets we are trying to catch slip through the net, or too vague that an unacceptable number of innocent organizations and people get wrongfully targeted.
Came here to say more or less what you did, but I wanted to add that even if the definition is strict, it can be broadened by later redefinitions or court rulings.