What Supreme Court case allows for the use of MI v Congressional assembled and approved agencies?
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
This is from
I am struggling to find it! I've been using justia.com and some other sources to try and track this down but I can't seem to find any casework related to "Military Intelligence".
https://supreme.justia.com/cases-by-topic/separation-of-powers/
https://law.justia.com/lawsearch?query=%22military%20intelligence%22
Any anons have better luck than me on this one? I don't see it in the "Answers" on https://qanon.pub
From my limited knowledge, Martial law is required to engage MI over congressional assemblies. Not sure which SC cases are involved.
https://media.greatawakening.win/post/9dWeZvAfb5jq.png
I was thinking martial law and maybe also just a general state of war would also be sufficient to give the executive that power.
EDIT:
u/#q11
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=151643575
“supreme court military intelligence state secrets”
“supreme court military intelligence state secrets agency”
“supreme court military intelligence state secrets congress”
Etc.
I hope that helps, but I am still refreshing my memory. I do recall that the Reynolds’s case was mentioned quite a bit. U.S. v Reynolds’s regarding state secrets.
Yeah Reynolds is the state secrets case but the case Q references here appears to decide whether MI has authority over legislated entities, and I suspect that the decision was in favor of the military.
Derek Johnson speaks about that case, and I want to say Marbury v Madison, but i just reviewed that and I'm not sure it fits. It was a much older case, iirc. If i think of it, I'll get back to you. I know what you're referring to.
Marbury v Madison says that an unconstitutional law can be ignored.
Yeah I don't see anything military related in Marbury vs. Madison, though I suppose this could be buried somewhere.
I feel like cross referencing with Insurrection Act invocations is a plausible starting point.
Hmmm…. I will keep looking. I have not reviewed the early Q posts in a while. There were some EO’s signed by Bush Jr. relating to the MI.
Maybe look at cases around the Civil War??? Or perhaps WW2???
I'm looking all over fren and just not finding it!! 🤣🤣
I thought maybe something Nixon or Kennedy related could be a possibility too.
The phrasing of "Congressional assembled and approved agencies" is kinda killing me too. Why does Q use the term "3 letter agencies" but then flip over to that in the next line? Should it be making this case easier to find?
FBI was definitely congressionally created, but CIA/OSS was initially created through executive order and still reports to Director of National Intelligence. Looks like the "Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act" in 2004 officially created the DNI role.
Look to the early 1970s race riots. I don’t have time to look now but it’s referred to in the q drops. Edit: u/#q28
Almost feels like Cramer vs. US deserves its own thread w/respect to what's going on with the borders and immigration:
"When an indictment charges treason by giving aid and comfort to enemies of the U.S., this requires proof of an overt act by the accused that is sufficient in its setting to sustain a finding that they actually gave aid and comfort to the enemy. Simply meeting and talking with the enemy is not enough."
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/325/1/
What could be more overt than ordering the border patrol to stand down and sending a plane over to pick up known enemies, and supply them with free housing, goods, and services?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Reynolds
Reynolds issues appear related to document discovery and state secrets w/respect to a Civil case. Are you seeing anything in there related to military intelligence vs. Congressional agencies?
https://8kun.top/qresearch/res/14782809.html
Maybe an anon from the future helping out? I suppose should consider the possibility the case does not exist yet... MI intelligence used over Federal Election Commission perhaps?
(Not related to case) https://youtu.be/VA4e0NqyYMw
I found a link between this Q post and a tweet by Robert Kennedy, Jr.
Kennedy quotes JFK: "My fellow Americans, let us take that first step."
He posted that at 1:47 PM on 3-25-2023. The first three numbers in the post ID is 147.
Here's the Telegram post: https://t.me/QSRdecodes/47681
"What Supreme Court case allows for the use of MI v Congressional assembled and approved agencies? "
Ok maybe I am just misreading this. What if this was meant to be read as:
"What Supreme Court case allows for the user of intelligence collected from the military over intelligence collected from agencies assembled and improved by Congress?"
Maybe it's more of an evidentiary question?